Positive users welcome Meta's massive compute ramp for superintelligence because it increases competition that benefits consumers, while negative users doubt the comeback narrative due to past failures and data concerns.
Based on 17 visible X reactions from 51 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
They need data, and data collection is precisely Muse's focus. Meta dreams of a virtual world but doesn't do the heavy lifting there’s too much politics and not enough actual work. They won't attract users by pushing a data-collection model where the user just goes around in circles and pays for the privilege, to boot. Man, they even track their own employees' data it's pathetic. There’s no way I’m paying to help a company that couldn't care less about people and users.
@kimmonismus this is good for everyone using ai. more pressure from meta means openai and anthropic cannot just rely on brand gravity forever.
@kimmonismus The more competition in the AI space the better; in the end humanity as a whole benefits from it the most.
@kimmonismus The winner here is us. When providers compete the real benefactor is the consumer.
Meta expanded its compute infrastructure across a 2,000-kilometer footprint
@kimmonismus The more competition the better as far as i'm concerned.
@kimmonismus 😂😂😂 what comeback?
I do not think anyone saw this massive comeback from Meta coming. And now they are even receiving high praise from SemiAnalysis. Just to be clear: I have the utmost respect for SemiAnalysis and Dylan Patel. They do truly outstanding research. And if they believe that Meta genuinely has the potential to take on OpenAI and Anthropic because of its compute, talent, and data, we should take them at their word. What is more, Spark 1.1 has shown just how realistic that is. It seemingly came out of nowhere and surprised everyone. And that is good for all of us, provided it intensifies competition and forces Anthropic in particular to respond much more positively to its customer base. This is especially important because Meta and SpaceX are bringing cost effectiveness even more sharply into focus, while also putting pressure on OpenAI.
I’m missing something here How can “there is no data wall” be congruous with “screen recording top engineers will be a moat” Just yesterday current AIs destroyed the world’s best programmers in coding competitions The era of human generated coding data is ending man https://twitter.com/semianalysis_/status/2075298749660725591
the powerful play goes on and you may contribute a verse. what will your verse be?" I think of this quote every time I think about what intelligent tokens we can generate and contribute to the models and human society. https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/2075364232623956227
the powerful play goes on and you may contribute a verse. what will your verse be https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/2075364232623956227
@kimmonismus It's not a comeback until it happens in reality.
Positive users welcome Meta's massive compute ramp for superintelligence because it increases competition that benefits consumers, while negative users doubt the comeback narrative due to past failures and data concerns.
Based on 17 visible X reactions from 51 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@kimmonismus 😂😂😂 what comeback?