Report
Opus 4.8 reportedly outperforms expert peer reviewers on 124 Harvard social science papers
Gary King and Steven Worthington say the human reviews were judged unusually good by journal editors and authors.
TLDR
A post says Opus 4.8 beat human experts as a peer reviewer in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering statistical analyses, formal models and qualitative work. Gary King and Steven Worthington say AI-generated reviews outperformed highly rated human reviews by every measure they constructed. They discuss potential ways to speed publication and improve its quality, alongside concerning downsides.
Combined views
30.3K
5 Sources, first seen ago
