Reaction
A proposal to personalize research-paper endorsements using evaluator agreement
A commenter suggests tracking agreement between paper evaluators to show whose endorsements may match a reader's views.
TLDR
A commenter proposes endorsing or evaluating papers rather than people, then using agreement or disagreement between people who assess the same paper to update how closely their views align. On new papers, readers could see endorsements alongside each endorser's correlation score with them. In a follow-up, the commenter joked that they might have reinvented a recommendation system.
Combined views
99
1 Source, first seen ago