A post favors curiosity-led research over a couple of labs using proprietary models to crack “trophy problems.”
A post argues that science’s ideal outcome is millions of AI-aided human scientists following their curiosity and becoming more ambitious, rather than a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack “trophy problems.”
85.2K
4 Sources, first seen ago
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@fcholletThe ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problems, it's to have millions of AI-aided human scientists who follow their curiosity and become way more ambitious
@menhguinthis is a nice thought, but unless publishing/citation incentives change, then revealed preference is 99% citation paper factories and 1% something kinda interesting
@yoavgoRT @fchollet: The ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problem…@fcholletThe ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problems, it's to have millions of AI-aided human scientists who follow their curiosity and become way more ambitious@menhguinthis is a nice thought, but unless publishing/citation incentives change, then revealed preference is 99% citation paper factories and 1% something kinda interesting@yoavgoRT @fchollet: The ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problem…@fcholletThe ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problems, it's to have millions of AI-aided human scientists who follow their curiosity and become way more ambitious@menhguinthis is a nice thought, but unless publishing/citation incentives change, then revealed preference is 99% citation paper factories and 1% something kinda interesting@yoavgoRT @fchollet: The ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problem…@fcholletThe ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problems, it's to have millions of AI-aided human scientists who follow their curiosity and become way more ambitious@menhguinthis is a nice thought, but unless publishing/citation incentives change, then revealed preference is 99% citation paper factories and 1% something kinda interesting@yoavgoRT @fchollet: The ideal outcome for science isn't a couple of labs using proprietary models and millions of dollars to crack trophy problem…
