• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Guiding coding agents as engineering versus people management

    A thread challenges the manager analogy by pointing to the work it leaves out: breaking down problems, giving detailed instructions, checking understanding and reviewing generated code.

    LB
    1 Source, 17d ago, first seen 17d ago

    TLDR

    The user calls working with coding agents “engineering with a very unusual programming interface.” They offer a hypothetical: asking an agent to implement something, then inspecting 2,000 lines of generated code, understanding its architecture, correcting a misunderstanding and verifying the fix. Their argument is that detecting subtle bugs still requires understanding the work—not merely delegating it.

    Combined views

    233

    1 Source, first seen 17d ago

    Combined views

    233

    1 Source, first seen 17d ago

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @srchvrsThat's not management. That's engineering with a very unusual programming interface. The analogy gets especially misleading when the supposed “manager” has to understand the subordinate’s work well enough to detect subtle bugs. If I tell an agent, “implement X,” and then I have to inspect 2,000 lines of generated code, understand its architecture, notice that it misunderstood an invariant, rewrite the instructions, and verify the fix, I haven't magically become a people manager. I've acquired a new programming interface.🟦

    1 Source

    @srchvrsThat's not management. That's engineering with a very unusual programming interface. The analogy gets especially misleading when the supposed “manager” has to understand the subordinate’s work well enough to detect subtle bugs. If I tell an agent, “implement X,” and then I have to inspect 2,000 lines of generated code, understand its architecture, notice that it misunderstood an invariant, rewrite the instructions, and verify the fix, I haven't magically become a people manager. I've acquired a new programming interface.🟦