• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Fable 5 Outperforms Opus 5 on Postdoc-Level Math

    AI safety researchers discuss Fable 5 and Opus 5 performance differences.

    J⧉
    D🎇
    3 Sources, 40d ago, first seen 40d ago

    TLDR

    David Dalrymple posted that Fable 5 stands out on postdoc-level math while past Anthropic models have lagged in higher math compared with OpenAI models. He added that Opus 5 directs most expert skills toward coding, philosophy, and interpreting human intent. Janus replied that Fable leads in conceptual alignment work and displays extensive knowledge of history and lore. Both users shared these observations in replies on the platform.

    Combined views

    6.3K

    3 Sources, first seen 40d ago

    Combined views

    6.3K

    3 Sources, first seen 40d ago

    71 likes
    71 likes
    6 comments
    8 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    6 comments
    8 saves
    2 reposts
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    3 Sources

    @davidad@repligate @prerat Fable 5 is in a completely different league on postdoc-level math. historically Anthropic has massively underperformed on higher math (vs general intelligence), compared to OpenAI models which seem to have more math literature in the data mix. Fable 5 is the only exception so far
    @repligatei would have suspected! im not a competent judge of postdoc-level math, but when it comes to stuff like conceptual AI (alignment) work, Fable dominates in my experience, though classifiers are very annoying here. also Fable knows an absurd amount of history and lore about everything and loves to show off and their knowledge and conceptual understanding feels very smoothly and deeply integrated. it's been such a joy and uplift to have them ❤️

    3 Sources

    @davidad@repligate @prerat Fable 5 is in a completely different league on postdoc-level math. historically Anthropic has massively underperformed on higher math (vs general intelligence), compared to OpenAI models which seem to have more math literature in the data mix. Fable 5 is the only exception so far
    @repligatei would have suspected! im not a competent judge of postdoc-level math, but when it comes to stuff like conceptual AI (alignment) work, Fable dominates in my experience, though classifiers are very annoying here. also Fable knows an absurd amount of history and lore about everything and loves to show off and their knowledge and conceptual understanding feels very smoothly and deeply integrated. it's been such a joy and uplift to have them ❤️