The case for using multiple people's AI models for value alignment
A user argues that sending a prompt to different people's language models yields a final query reflecting the combined values and mental models of those people.
TLDR
In a reply thread, a user argues that the query returned after sending a prompt to different people's language models represents the “sum total” of those people's values and mental models. They call this a strategy for value alignment, then offer a self-described “big if true” claim that the setup solves most of AI's biggest problems. They say work toward it is moving too slowly and invite questions to improve the ideas.
Combined views
749
1 Source, first seen 15d ago