• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Can AI companies be trusted to handle safety without new rules?

    A post quotes David Sacks urging companies to make products safe without government concessions. Another commenter argues new regulations aren't needed, while a critic questions whether AI companies have earned that trust.

    Yann LeCunYL
    Gary MarcusGM
    David SacksDS
    27 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    A post quotes David Sacks telling Dario: “Go ahead and make your products safe without demanding any concession from the government.” A separate post quotes Jensen saying, “If you aren’t confident that what you are releasing is safe, then don’t release it.” That post’s author argues no new rules or regulations are required. The counterpoint is about trust: a critic addressing Sacks asks why companies should be trusted and argues they haven’t earned it.

    Combined views

    1.5M

    27 Sources, first seen 22d ago

    Combined views

    1.5M

    27 Sources, first seen 22d ago

    13.1K likes
    22d ago
    first seen 22d ago
    13.1K likes
    755 comments
    1.4K saves
    2.6K reposts
    755 comments
    1.4K saves
    2.6K reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive46%54%Negative

    Based on 283 sentiment-bearing replies from 261 accounts across 14 conversations.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    27 Sources

    Innovation Council@innovationcncl🚨 Another common-sense message from @DavidSacks to Dario: “Go ahead and make your products safe without demanding any concession from the government.”22d
    rat king 🐀@MikeIsaacmy read on Sacks/jensen doing media tour is that everyone who is not Safetypilled in AI land was surprised at how much the coxon resignation blew up and how dario's memo went huge, and now have to push back just as hard am curious if the message lands the same way w/ mainstream22d
    Gary Marcus@GaryMarcusWhy oh why should we trust the companies to do so, @DavidSacks? I missed the part where they have earned our trust.22d
    David Sacks@DavidSacksRT @innovationcncl: 🚨 Another common-sense message from @DavidSacks to Dario: “Go ahead and make your products safe without demanding any c…22d
    *Walter Bloomberg@DeItaoneNVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS OR REGULATIONS FOR AI SAFETY - SALESFORCE EVENT NVIDIA CEO: ON AI SAFETY, SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD PACE THEMSELVES UNTIL THEY ARE ARE CONFIDENT THEY ARE RELEASING SOMETHING THE MARKET WOULD APPRECIATE22d
    CSPAN@cspanNvidia CEO @JensenHuang on AI safety: "If you built a product or a service and you're not confident in its functionality, capability or safety then don't release it."22d
    Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiJensen Huang pushed back hard against AI labs calling for tighter regulation and slower AI development, at Dreamforce. "If you are not confident about the safety of the products, and you're not confident in its functionality, capability, or safety, then don't just release it. We don't need any new laws. We don't need new regulations. we just need companies to decide that when it's time to run as fast as they can." safety and speed are not mutually exclusive, and new laws are not required to make AI systems safer. Build fast, test aggressively, and pause only when you are no longer confident the product is safe. --- From "Salesforce" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)22d
    martin_casado@martin_casadoRT @DeItaone: NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS OR REGULATIONS FOR AI SAFETY - SALESFORCE EVENT NVIDIA CEO: ON AI SAFETY, SAYS…22d
    elvis@omarsar0Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently Mark bring some sense into this conversation. Not sure how we have allowed this alignment stuff to become so political and sci-fi. We need to go back to fundamentals. If your model or AI product by extension is unsafe/defective, it’s your responsibility to fix it.22d
    Reuters@ReutersAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei repeated his call to slow AI development at a San Francisco tech conference, urging safety investment and global standards, as Nvidia's Jensen Huang said firms must pause unsafe products till they know how to control it https://reut.rs/4AdCRzk22d

    27 Sources

    Innovation Council@innovationcncl🚨 Another common-sense message from @DavidSacks to Dario: “Go ahead and make your products safe without demanding any concession from the government.”22d
    rat king 🐀@MikeIsaacmy read on Sacks/jensen doing media tour is that everyone who is not Safetypilled in AI land was surprised at how much the coxon resignation blew up and how dario's memo went huge, and now have to push back just as hard am curious if the message lands the same way w/ mainstream22d
    Gary Marcus@GaryMarcusWhy oh why should we trust the companies to do so, @DavidSacks? I missed the part where they have earned our trust.22d
    David Sacks@DavidSacksRT @innovationcncl: 🚨 Another common-sense message from @DavidSacks to Dario: “Go ahead and make your products safe without demanding any c…22d
    *Walter Bloomberg@DeItaoneNVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS OR REGULATIONS FOR AI SAFETY - SALESFORCE EVENT NVIDIA CEO: ON AI SAFETY, SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD PACE THEMSELVES UNTIL THEY ARE ARE CONFIDENT THEY ARE RELEASING SOMETHING THE MARKET WOULD APPRECIATE22d
    CSPAN@cspanNvidia CEO @JensenHuang on AI safety: "If you built a product or a service and you're not confident in its functionality, capability or safety then don't release it."22d
    Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiJensen Huang pushed back hard against AI labs calling for tighter regulation and slower AI development, at Dreamforce. "If you are not confident about the safety of the products, and you're not confident in its functionality, capability, or safety, then don't just release it. We don't need any new laws. We don't need new regulations. we just need companies to decide that when it's time to run as fast as they can." safety and speed are not mutually exclusive, and new laws are not required to make AI systems safer. Build fast, test aggressively, and pause only when you are no longer confident the product is safe. --- From "Salesforce" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)22d
    martin_casado@martin_casadoRT @DeItaone: NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS OR REGULATIONS FOR AI SAFETY - SALESFORCE EVENT NVIDIA CEO: ON AI SAFETY, SAYS…22d
    elvis@omarsar0Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently Mark bring some sense into this conversation. Not sure how we have allowed this alignment stuff to become so political and sci-fi. We need to go back to fundamentals. If your model or AI product by extension is unsafe/defective, it’s your responsibility to fix it.22d
    Reuters@ReutersAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei repeated his call to slow AI development at a San Francisco tech conference, urging safety investment and global standards, as Nvidia's Jensen Huang said firms must pause unsafe products till they know how to control it https://reut.rs/4AdCRzk22d

    Sentiment

    Positive46%54%Negative

    Based on 283 sentiment-bearing replies from 261 accounts across 14 conversations.