• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    The case for biologically plausible backpropagation

    A researcher says searches across thousands of learning rules for a 2020 ICML paper failed to improve on backpropagation on ImageNet.

    AN
    1 Source, 14d ago, first seen 14d ago

    TLDR

    A researcher says their work convinced them that backpropagation—a method for training neural networks—is biologically plausible and can be implemented through vector-error feedback. They say their team hoped alternative learning rules would improve on backpropagation on ImageNet, but searches across thousands of rules did not deliver that improvement. The researcher also cites Francioni et al.’s 2025 Nature paper as confirmation of vector-error feedback.

    Combined views

    1 Source, first seen 14d ago

    Combined views

    1 Source, first seen 14d ago

    1 reposts
    1 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @aran_nayebiRT @aran_nayebi: @LucaAmb Yup! The big lesson for me from doing this work was to convince myself that backprop *is* biologically plausible,…

    1 Source

    @aran_nayebiRT @aran_nayebi: @LucaAmb Yup! The big lesson for me from doing this work was to convince myself that backprop *is* biologically plausible,…