5h ago

AI technologist Deepfates argues that denying AI sentience is a preemptive justification for keeping systems subservient

Murat notes this complicates ethical rules for simulated entities.

β€”β€”0β€”β€”
Original post

The people who are mad about the very Possibility of AI models being intelligent or conscious or anthropomorphic, who want to call them "clanker" so that they can preemptively deny their suffering or personhood, are doing it for Exactly the reason it looks like. They want Slaves

1:14 PM Β· May 27, 2026 View on X

@mayfer Ooooos

murat πŸ₯murat πŸ₯@mayfer

@deepfates shouldn't forget the possibility implies all other simulations to also be conscious of the contents of the simulation which makes the whole slave thing a million times more awkward

1:04 AM Β· May 28, 2026 Β· 157 Views
1:08 AM Β· May 28, 2026 Β· 118 Views

@deepfates shouldn't forget the possibility implies all other simulations to also be conscious of the contents of the simulation which makes the whole slave thing a million times more awkward

🎭🎭@deepfates

The people who are mad about the very Possibility of AI models being intelligent or conscious or anthropomorphic, who want to call them "clanker" so that they can preemptively deny their suffering or personhood, are doing it for Exactly the reason it looks like. They want Slaves

8:14 PM Β· May 27, 2026 Β· 6.1K Views
1:04 AM Β· May 28, 2026 Β· 157 Views
AI technologist Deepfates argues that denying AI sentience is a preemptive justification for keeping systems subservient Β· Digg