AI safety and the line between coordination and conspiracy
A post argues that coordination around AI safety is normal social-movement organizing, not a conspiracy, and says the backlash seems equally coordinated.
TLDR
A post argues that the shift in public sentiment on AI was coordinated, framing that as ordinary movement-building rather than a conspiracy. It says the AI safety movement, rooted largely in rationalism and effective altruism, has spent 20 years building relationships across media, government and elite circles. It also argues that the backlash against AI safety—especially negative posts about effective altruism—seems equally coordinated.
Combined views
7.3K
1 Source, first seen 15d ago