What is Digg?61 Comments
- sheeplescareme, on 01/02/2009, -5/+49excellent vid, though i doubt most of the 0bama crowd now sees anything wrong with remaining in iraq, sending more troops to afghanistan, threatening iran, russia, pakistan, etc. they don't seem to see anything wrong with much of anything he does or says. they got their "change." shrub will be out of the white house though more of the same is moving in.
- Richandler, on 01/02/2009, -5/+49I still want to either create or find a web site that has "So much for CHANGE" bumper stickers.
- roho76, on 01/02/2009, -5/+41Very good video.
I am afraid of the near future. - inactive, on 01/02/2009, -2/+23time to stockpile supplies. you know what kind.
- boulder555, on 01/02/2009, -3/+22Well done piece by the Campaign For Liberty and worth the time to view in it's entirety.
I agree with kaelyiesta, that there are elements of propaganda in the use of certain phrases --- but that is the essence of argumentation. Our argument is that the Constitution is meant to restrain Congress and, to the extent it is ignored 'we the people' lose. - lccat, on 01/02/2009, -3/+20Repeat, "The One World Government supported by the current President and obama along with BLANKET AMNESTY again supported by both with the interference of the U.N. will lead the United States to become just another Third World Country whose only purpose will be to provide CHEAP LABOR for the Elitist Politicians and their Elitist Political Contributors."
- claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -0/+17Both the occupation of Iraq and the occupation of Afghanistan have outlasted the length of WW2, it's not even a contest anymore.
There are 1 Million dead iraqi civilans so far, including 400,000+ children (estimated) in a war that was started under "UN RESOLUTIONS"
There are 140+ nations around the world with US bases, and some of them with us puppet governments, like Georgia for example. I think they are much closer to this "World Government" than you think.
Pay attention dude... the agenda is further along than you think, but i bet you'll deny it 'til death :-) - Rikety, on 01/02/2009, -1/+17In a strict sense you are right @kaely, but it is really not much different than the vision of a Stalin v. a Hitler, a Mussolini v. a Tojo, an Internationalist v. a Bilderberger. They all want a World Order with the centralized, stifling control over all possible things human and societal. I propose that it doesn't matter how it's done, it's bad for the Human Spirit and general humanity.
- BohicaTwentyTwo, on 01/02/2009, -1/+16Member nations should not be afraid of their world governing body, world governing bodies should be afraid of their member nations.
- kaelyiesta, on 01/02/2009, -3/+18I was talking with a friend of mine who fancies himself a pragmatist. You described his military views pretty well. He justifies a lot of this behavior because of the complex political problems facing any president who would actually obey the Constitution. I had no sympathy for his supposedly more "feet on the ground" views. If we all just took the easy way out and capitulated to whatever power controlled things and compromised our views, we would all be slaves or slave owners. We would only get to vote if we were white males. We would only get to vote if our colonial magistrate allowed us.
Compromise isn't always virtuous. In some cases it simply prolongs and makes inevitable the decline into what we should have fought against right from the start. - claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -1/+16It Probably wouldn't be all that hard to do.
Just send a design to cafepress, sign up to them as an affiliate and make a website.
im sure lots of people would buy those man. - netneutrality, on 01/03/2009, -0/+13Dugg for Ron Paul.
- bradysbeau, on 01/02/2009, -3/+15I hope this is wrong but I am noticing this phrase... New World Order more & more and I fear it does not bode well for the common man/woman. Here we go again...fear...
- PatsRiot, on 01/02/2009, -3/+14Really good vid
- GovernmentsGun, on 01/02/2009, -0/+11Every president has passed unconstitutional legislation; no exceptions. Obama will be no different.
This is why you can never trust a politician, or a piece of paper, with your freedom. - Arlo003, on 01/02/2009, -1/+12Talk to Rick McGinnis of Liberty Stickers!
- claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -1/+12just to clarify, this wasn't done by the CFL. It was an independent video, made by me
I just decided to promote the CFL, since they ***** rock! ;-)
In no way are me and this video associated with Campaign for Liberty. - claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -0/+10I don't associate myself with the scumbag GOP in any way.... but good one man ;-)
- Dymaxionpz, on 01/02/2009, -1/+11I was offered (& accepted) a bumper sticker at my last LP meetup:
"
I'll keep my guns,
freedom, & money...
YOU CAN KEEP THE "CHANGE!"
"
I was looking for a distributor online the other day and couldn't find one.
Good luck! - lolwaffle, on 01/02/2009, -2/+11I have no pity for Obama voters. I saw it coming. He got so many votes just because people disliked McCain more. It's time to define what a "wasted" vote is.
- kaelyiesta, on 01/02/2009, -6/+14While I'm already convinced of much that the video concludes, it's emphasis on the phrase "New world order" is somewhat circumspect. These people in the video each use it in different context as more of a buzzword for their own political views than as a reference to any worldwide conspiracy. It's just like Obama's "Change" rhetoric in that these people mean it as "out with the old, in with the new". It isn't a reference to one unified underlying belief in global government in most cases.
- SuperVepr308, on 01/02/2009, -2/+10I was wearing my Bowman Feed Company shirt the other day ("Home of the 20MM Deal!") Looks like I might be wearing it more in the future. For the unitiated, look up Unintentional Consequences by John Ross. It's known as "the book" in my circle. Yes, I have a signed copy:)
- eredeath, on 01/02/2009, -3/+10There will be no new world order. There is still a minority of people in the US that will never let this happen. A minority is all it takes to start a revolution.
- kemp34, on 01/03/2009, -0/+5The creation of America wasn't very "pragmatic".
Pragmatists hate America. - kemp34, on 01/03/2009, -0/+5It's a question of liberty versus tyranny.
- claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -1/+6I hope you're right man!
- gwohl, on 01/03/2009, -0/+5A good additional film to view is Aaron Russo's "America: From Freedom to Fascism." It delivers compelling information on New World Order pursuits in stunning detail and with frightening realism.
- claytrainor, on 01/02/2009, -3/+7Please cite, or give an example of how i somehow advocated Violence.
It's the "Unconstitutional Agenda" that is causing the real violence in this world, wake up dude. - jh4rms, on 01/04/2009, -0/+4It kinda pisses me off that so many people believed in this guy, and actually thought he would bring real change. I guess I can't blame them though, because the MSM brainwashed the piss out of them.
- muckemuck, on 01/03/2009, -0/+3"nothing of the sort has ever happened" .. you've apparently been asleep the last 8 years. The legal and political moves have been made. The stage is set. I really wish you were right, but the odds of that have gone down considerably in the last year.
- kemp34, on 01/03/2009, -0/+3"Nothing of the sort has ever happened" does not equate to they are not trying to do such.
Look up the quotes by folks such as David Rockefeller, they say it out of their OWN MOUTHS. - muckemuck, on 01/03/2009, -0/+3But this time around they know exactly who those people are. They have your phone records, they have your e-mails, your bank statements, your health records, satellite images of your property, etc..
- muckemuck, on 01/03/2009, -1/+4Have you seen the appointments to his cabinet?? More of the same.
- sigg14, on 01/02/2009, -2/+4typical obamatard response, if you don't lick obamas balls like them you are either a "neocon" or a racist
- netneutrality, on 01/02/2009, -0/+2Maddoktor did you even watch it?
- WhatBubbaKnows, on 01/02/2009, -1/+3Time to feed the hogs.
- SleepParalysis, on 01/04/2009, -0/+2You're right there. I think the day that black vans start taking people away it will push others over the edge, hopefully.
- jaymzdean, on 01/03/2009, -0/+2drum roll...
http://www.cafepress.com/somuchforchange.345142330 - fish0507, on 01/03/2009, -0/+2Typical Obama-bot response.
- Nannybell, on 01/03/2009, -1/+2Why silly? He's already announced what he intends to do. It's no secret. It's not like we're waiting to find out what he stands for. He's already told us.
- dracostimpy, on 01/03/2009, -0/+1Okay, but who should I be afraid of? There's so many scary things in the world, I just don't know who or what I'm supposed to fear anymore!
- reaperhatch, on 01/03/2009, -0/+1fear fear.
- fish0507, on 01/03/2009, -0/+1WOW this is a very good comment, absolutely true
- THETEH, on 01/03/2009, -0/+1Sure, I've seen the stuff Bush has done, but I don't think he's trying to create a new world order. People say the war in Iraq is part of the plan to make a new world order. The war in Iraq failed to create a unified Iraqi government, let alone a unified global government. As for the economic stuff, I fail to see how it's going to create a global dictatorship.
When Obama's presidency is over, the world will NOT be a unified dictatorship. It will be fractured in to individual government that hate each other, just as it always has been. - ThsGuyRightHere, on 01/02/2009, -1/+2Isn't it kinda silly to say something like that before inauguration day?
- SuperVepr308, on 01/02/2009, -1/+2You just made me smile, Bubba:)
Signed,
SuperVepr308
1234 Rock Quarry Road
Solothurn, MO - THETEH, on 01/03/2009, -1/+1Extraordinary claims such as NWO require extraordinary evidence. The fact that a few prominent capitalists have said the words "new world order" is NOT enough evidence to win me over.
Besides, think about the concept of a united global government. The governments of the world hate each other. Especially in the middle east. There won't be a united middle east government any time soon, let alone a united global government.
Until I've seen more evidence than a few (mostly very vague!) quotes, I'll be writing off NWO as a rather pretentious way to write off whichever president happens to be in office at the moment. - INTERNETMASTER, on 01/03/2009, -3/+3lou dobbs is a xenophobic nut
- WhiteHatTrick, on 01/02/2009, -2/+2It il be a big hit until the internet gets taken away about a month later
-
Show 51 - 62 of 62 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is