What is Digg?321 Comments
- adanac, on 04/11/2008, -31/+119while i do not like nor trust the UN (product of the CFR, Rothchilds, Rockefellers and other banksters) this is a good thing, and hopefully there will finally be a full, fair, impartial investigation into 9/11 somewhere in the not too distant future.
Great work by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Dr. David Ray Griffin and other scholars ! - rme518, on 04/11/2008, -33/+87
Below are just two of the many 9/11 censored voices that we rarely hear from in
lamestream media.
" I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict Dick Cheney, Karl
Rove, and others close to the Wall St. gangs of the neo-Nazi coup de etat and kickoff
clash of civilizations." Robert David Steele, U.S. Marine Corp. Infantry and Intelligence
Officer, former CIA Clandestine Case Officer (www.patriotsquestion911.org)
" Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information? Who put out patently
false stories in the first place? When you put all these things together, I think it is
pretty clear that it's highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing
through Dick Cheney."
Col. Robert Bowman, U.S. Air Force (ret.) former Head of Star Wars, Ph.D. in
Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Recipient of the Eisenhower Medal and dozens
of prestigious national awards. (www.patriotsquestion911.org) - Hangly, on 04/11/2008, -22/+74Non-Americans have a much clearer and disambiguated perception of what the current US administration is capable of. Too many Americans suffer from "my country right or wrong" syndrome.
- SuperMoses, on 04/11/2008, -7/+50People can hate conspiracy theorists all they want, but when it comes down to it, their conspiracies exist due to LACK of transparency from the government. If the government wasn't so secretive, these movements wouldn't be as vocal.
I'm sure those in the 60s who said the CIA were practicing mind control and experimenting with LSD on people without their consent were viewed as nutty conspiracy theorists.. who would have thought they were right: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKULTRA
This program starts in the early 50s and was only made public in 1975..almost 25 years after the program started. So they were able to keep that on the "downlo" for that long.. claims of people in the US government conspiring against US citizens no longer seems like an extraordinary claim. The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they jump to conclusions with sufficient evidence, however.. as I said, their conclusions are no longer that extraordinary.
I also don't want to lump all conspiracy theorists together. Some are more reasonable theories than others. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -16/+47With all due respect to gun owners, I'm not sure a crowded airliner is the right place loaded weapons.
- NonLeftistDiggr, on 04/11/2008, -18/+39The UN calling for an investigation of anything other than UN fraud and corruption is offensive. Let somebody with credibility do this. Their own internal investigations were rigged.
- HughManBeing, on 04/11/2008, -48/+67Norad Stand Down - Morning of 9/11
War Games - Unprecedented levels that day
FBI Arrest of Explosive Laden Van http://www.911blogger.com/node/11425
PNAC Quote - "New Pearl Harbor"
Larry Silverstein Quote - "Pull It"
WTC 7 and the BBC's Report of its collapse - 20 min. early
Sibel Edmonds - Whistleblower
Norman Mineta - Testimony
Anthrax from U.S. Labs - used to silence opposition
Operation Northwoods - Precedent
Molten Metal - Thermite/Thermate - Evidence
Symmetrical Free Fall Collapse - Obvious use of explosives
Put Options - Foreknowledge
Footage of the Pentagon not released - Cover-up.
Secret Service - lack of behavior in Sarasota.
Basic Laws of Physics - http://www.911blogger.com/files/wtc23.jpg
Bin Ladens flying out of the country after 9/11.
Warnings from World Leaders before attacks, yet went ahead with pre-scheduled war games. - TrevaLVF, on 04/11/2008, -11/+29It might not be such a good thing if it leads to another cover-up, or something worse.
- datagod, on 04/11/2008, -13/+30I am just so sick of brainwashed, corn-sugar sucking fat retards in America who cannot see that they allowed their country to be stolen away from them.
Keep sucking back your coke, chowing down on your deep fried cow carcasses, keep getting your lard ass bigger and bigger.....you bunch of moronic cattle.
WAKE UP!! - KMye, on 04/11/2008, -17/+32Wow, and Israel doesn't want to let this ***** into their country to appraise their "Nazi" treatment of the Palestinians. How unreasonable of them...
- IIAmusedII, on 04/11/2008, -6/+21Yeah, if you question the corporately owned media and/or the Bush administration, you must be a lunatic or something, especially when you never bring up any specific points to support what you're saying. Besides, who ever heard of a gov't blowing up its own stuff just to get the people to consent to war?
- gonegoogling, on 04/11/2008, -28/+43another huge crack in the dam..........it has now become a question of when not if the truth will out!
- flip2trip, on 04/11/2008, -15/+27I'm only going to address one of your statements:
WTC-7 has small, scattered fires, yet implodes in
a controlled demolition. Silverstein says it was
pulled.
Silverstein's Quote:
"I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
-Fact which is undisputed by either side, he was talking to the fire commander
-Fact which is undisputed by either side, both are not in the demolition business
Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:
"In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building."
He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...
"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski - thebaron2, on 04/11/2008, -3/+15The *pilots* should have been armed. Other than that, loaded guns are just a liability on a plane.
- desuexmachina, on 04/11/2008, -5/+17While my mind tends to discount what the government and media tell me as propaganda, my mind also tells me that Joe Asshat from the internet is probably not the leading expert on the matter.
- nicepants, on 04/11/2008, -2/+13Questioning the government != claiming that they were responsible for 911
- Hangly, on 04/11/2008, -13/+23I have a job and a life so I can't respond to all of these, but:
Thermite/Thermate: Evidence of this is ample.
1) Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel.
2) The thinning of the steel occurred by high temperature corrosion due to a combination of oxidation and sulfidation.
3) The unusual thinning of the member is most likely due to an attack of the steel by grain boundary penetration of sulfur forming sulfides that contain both iron and copper.
4) liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurg ...
All of which is consistent with thermite/thermate.
Please stop invoking physics to spread ignorance. You make baby Isaac Newton cry. - pintomp3, on 04/11/2008, -14/+24except that we are one of the most greedy and corrupt members.
- Arcueid01, on 04/11/2008, -7/+17Man you hit it right on the head. We need a formal investigation and we need the courts and not any of the neo-con cronies to appoint the inspection commission.
- sjl127, on 04/11/2008, -7/+17Now there's a trustworthy organization, the UN.
- knight2001, on 04/11/2008, -7/+16You're joking right? If you were allowed to board planes armed to the teeth then I am sure the terrorists would not have simply left their weapons behind. Also how hard would it be for a terrorist.. (and they are not all non-american.. There are many many crazy Americans that would do it) pull out the gun and shoot out a window? How many times have you heard about people going nuts and having to be restrained by crew because they wanted off the plane? Do you think they wouldn't pull a gun if they were already crazy enough to try and open the door? It happens... Like it or not there are some places you should not be allowed your gun.
However, having an armed air marshal on every flight would have helped as they can carry a gun and you can pretty much count on the fact they won't flipout and start shooting over their coke being warm or their pillow not being fluffy enough. - Hangly, on 04/11/2008, -6/+14I'll field that one. The towers were evacuated for several days just prior to 9/11.
As seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvj7Q9LRAJo
(The relevant part begins at 1:30) - matadata, on 04/11/2008, -6/+14Why are you righties so hung up with the belief that the UN is some horribly corrupt power-hungry organization. I'm sure there's some corruption, but for Christ sakes... some people in the UN have died fighting for human rights. They're not all terrible people. And if you voted for Bush even once, you might want to tune up your corruption-detector.
- clayasaurus, on 04/11/2008, -33/+40911 is an inside job, my friends. Someday to be revealed for all to see.
- sicamore, on 04/11/2008, -3/+10and replace it with what? A single hegemony dictating to others the way things should be? Don't forget that the UN does a lot more that what the media gives it credit for. For example, countries have a forum for dialogue as a very basic one. They use this to discuss international laws, treaties, health, education and of course security all in a forum where countries can have a voice and be treated as peers. The only people that would have a problem with this are those that feel that their country deserves to do the dictating and have no checks and balances on their actions.
Don't be a victim of media sensationalism - samfishercell, on 04/11/2008, -5/+12And this guy was elected to a position in charge of reporting on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs? Good grief. This guy is clearly not the best choice for the job.
- Mothrog, on 04/11/2008, -1/+8Do you assclowns honestly expect to be taken seriously when you constantly say such completely moronic *****?
- Arcueid01, on 04/11/2008, -5/+11Well, I am all about this and exposing corruption in our government. It isn't just the neo-cons, however, we certainly have a huge problem with them as of late because they are in many seats of power. I just wish American's weren't so ***** blind. Everyone denounces the facts and says that it is just too implausible, however, I don't think that it is implausible. I think that the administration is more than capable of an inside job.
- tskier, on 04/11/2008, -38/+44Time to get out of the UN. It has become nothing more than a criminal enterprise which only exists to line the pockets of its greedy members.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -3/+9This idiot was just as right about the Ayatolla Khomeni as he about a 9-11 conspiracy . For those of you retards who cant read that far here is the last couple of sentences from the article:
In a February 16, 1979, op-ed for the New York Times, Mr. Falk praised Ayatollah Khomeini and bemoaned his ill treatment in the American press. He wrote, "The depiction of him as fanatical, reactionary and the bearer of crude prejudices seems certainly and happily false."Nearly nine months later, student followers of Khomeini invaded the American embassy in Tehran and held 52 diplomats hostage for the following 444 days. - inactive, on 04/11/2008, -4/+10cashman...you were already made to look like a ***** idiot when you suggested this last night. Why would you do it again and expect the turnout to be better?
- JMScheib, on 04/11/2008, -3/+9hahah. You must be one awesome bad ass in real life. Can I meet you?
Best insane rant on digg ever.
Keep it real, dawg. - Intercon, on 04/11/2008, -2/+8You sir, have relinquished your own credibility with the term "truther." Please wake the ***** up and look at the facts. It's really very simple. 9/11 was an neocon and israeli-orchestrated false flag operation used to change the political climate and launch a war of imperialism. To suggest otherwise, is to reveal an ignorance of the facts of the case, and likely a contempt for the rule of law and the rights of man. Ignorant sheep like you who swallow the cover story and spew disdain on persons who are real patriots and are fighting against the high-jacking of their government are pathetic, sir, I said pathetic. Educate yourself!
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -6/+12 It can replace your insulator hat, the one that insulates you from taking a deeper look then whatever you are told.
- inactive, on 04/11/2008, -2/+7The first amendment to free speech cuts both ways, if you come up or believe in ridiculous conspiracy theories and use your first amendment right as a defense to do so, then you deserve to be marginalized and criticized by better better educated and clearer thinking individuals who are also protected by the same first amendment right.
- Poovey, on 04/11/2008, -0/+5Falk is a loon, but then again this is typical of the UN.
- Hangly, on 04/11/2008, -18/+23He's a Princeton law professor. Who the hell are you?
- GhostyBoy, on 04/11/2008, -9/+14I'm with you on that one yellow. This argument that having everyone on the flight armed to the teeth seems pretty silly to me.
- timbellomo, on 04/11/2008, -2/+7they don't *have* to fly...
- mwrl, on 04/11/2008, -4/+9I can comfirm that the Air Force was flying normal missions that day. We expanded after the event to clear the skies of non-military aircraft.
- Xopl, on 04/11/2008, -2/+7Isn't it interesting that one of the first things you'll hear from people who believe the "official" 9/11 story is that "if there was a conspiracy or coverup, surely somebody would come forward or leak the information."
But then when people do come forward or do leak information, it is "second hand" or "made up" or "they are crazy."
I don't think people really think about that hard enough.
This said, I'm sorry HughManBeing, but a lot of your list is ridiculous. - SilverStandard, on 04/11/2008, -12/+17I wonder how long it will be until the Bury Brigade or Digg censors this...
- sremick, on 04/11/2008, -0/+5I'm an American, and I approve this message.
- SemiSarcastic, on 04/11/2008, -2/+7Being a wealthy banker myself who wears an eyepatch, lights my cigars with $100 bills and strokes a white fluffy cat, I'm offended by your comment.
- publiclurker, on 04/11/2008, -3/+8We've already had a trained pilot put a round through the side of a plane.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 319 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 