What is Digg?325 Comments
- TheJokerV, on 11/07/2007, -16/+90Unfortunately the truth means little to the leaders of the US. This report won't change anything.
- ScornForSega, on 11/07/2007, -13/+67No evidence? Those sneaky sons of bitches. That can only mean one thing: they're hiding the nukes from the inspectors! Of course, this means we have to bomb them, then we'll find the WMDs.
/facetious - SuperMoses, on 11/03/2007, -6/+49This is beginning to like the lead up to the Iraq War:
Blix: Inspections are working, still no evidence of WMDs
Bush: Whatever. WAR! - SOS84, on 10/31/2007, -11/+40Yeah, just like Iraq wasn't trying to produce a nuclear weapon, oh wait, they weren't.
- TheHydrogens, on 10/31/2007, -5/+31I know what you mean.... I no longer trust anybody named George, as everyone named George is a liar.
- MWeather, on 10/31/2007, -5/+30You mean the reactors they were allowed to have under the non-proliferation agreement? Though to be fair, Israel didn't sign that agreement, so never agreed that Syria could have nuclear reactors. The US however, is a signatory, and should have condemned Israels actions against Syria's legal and treaty-protected nuclear activities.
- petebot, on 11/01/2007, -2/+25Iran is building nuclear weapons, but you can only see them if you are a true American.
- ozziegt, on 10/31/2007, -2/+22You need to better understand what the non-proliferation agreement allows & disallows before you start the name calling.
- TheHydrogens, on 10/31/2007, -2/+21Racist much? You do realize that MOST Muslims aren't the evil baby killing psychopaths that you have been led to believe they are, right?
- JJCDAD, on 11/01/2007, -1/+20I want an Atomic Watchdog™
- jamesallen74, on 11/01/2007, -5/+23Does Iran have oil? Yes
Then we will invade Iran within the next 15 months.
But of course it won't be for the oil. - MWeather, on 10/31/2007, -3/+21I support fulfilling our treaty obligations. If we didn't want Syria to have a nuclear program, we shouldn't have signed a treaty that says they can have one.
Why do you hate the rule of law? - TheHydrogens, on 10/31/2007, -4/+21Oh my GOD! He's right! Quick everybody, lets all do exactly what he says! Let him put cameras everywhere in our homes so we are safe!
- nblsavage, on 10/31/2007, -2/+19Ah..thanks for proving that you're not only a moron but your a bigoted one as well.
- TheSwashbuckler, on 10/29/2007, -3/+20"Are people really THIS STUPID..."
You obviously are. - identifiedlogo, on 10/31/2007, -8/+24tell that to the 24% brain dead americans...
- ironhide, on 10/31/2007, -2/+17Let me guess, you think Muhammad Ali is in on it too yes?
- CrazedLeper, on 10/29/2007, -3/+18That's just typical American stupidity. Shake it off.
- nblsavage, on 10/31/2007, -1/+16What do they call you? The moron?
- nblsavage, on 10/31/2007, -1/+15For the record Mohamed ElBaradei is Egyptian.
- youdlike2know, on 10/31/2007, -6/+17everyone knows that they're building invisible stealth nukes..
- williamdyer, on 10/31/2007, -0/+11Monty2 appears to equate suicide with "Israel has to dominate the region militarily and be able to blow up Lebanon any time they get the itch to do it."
Yeah, Israel having to think twice before launching a war would be real suicide. Maybe it would be so suicidal we could bring our troops home and stop sending billions of dollars to Israel every year. - protogenxl, on 10/29/2007, -3/+14I have said it before and I will say it again why build one when you can buy a quality Soviet unit for Pennies on the Ruble.
- Bhima, on 10/31/2007, -1/+12Over the months or years I've been reading Digg I notice that there are always 6-12 people who are online at any given time who are reliably blindly pro Bush / NeoCon. There are never more than a dozen and you’ll see the nicks change over time from a first name / number combo… now to the pronouncement of why they are on Digg in the first place (in the case against anything to left of himself… which is the majority of the worlds population). The thing I wonder is, is this the same group of 6-12 of paid shills changing their nics as the old ones get blocked or banned or is a steady influx of new people from the less sane and creepy parts of the net like ‘stormfront’, ‘family security matters’, LGF, and GoE.
- ironhide, on 10/31/2007, -4/+14Ladies and gentlemen - I nominate Monty2 as the Neocon shill of the day.
- dxgg, on 02/05/2008, -3/+13Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a war out of my ass!
Rocky: Again? That trick never works! - williamdyer, on 10/31/2007, -0/+10Were you just as sure about Iraq and WMDs, or Al Quaida?
- themacx, on 11/07/2007, -10/+19there are no WM D's.. no *****.. so what? does it matter?... it does to me but hey who am I... who are WE?
- krnldmp, on 10/31/2007, -0/+9That's a slight case of NIMBY, I'm sure, not that it has anything to do with Liberals. Also, notice the Administration isn't making a big fuss about the power reactor either. They're still trying to make up some noise about nuclear weapons because they can't stand Iran keeping the money it makes off it's oil. I trust Iran. Why? If they step out of line just a LITTLE bit they are DUST, and Iran knows that.
- rompom7, on 10/31/2007, -0/+9I don't know if you are being sarcastic or what.. Maybe you didn't get what Achalemoipas said.
They (UN) said the same about Iraq (no WMDs). They (UN) knew this because they had just spent the last decade destroying them (WMDs). - inactive, on 10/31/2007, -0/+8Hes name is derived from a muslim .. Terrorist!
Obamas half muslim ... Terrorist!
Apu from the simpsons is terrorist propaganda...Terrorist!
All brown skinned People = Terrorist, The Mind of righty nut. - nblsavage, on 10/29/2007, -0/+8You're right...the correct term is bigot. Feel better now?
- jstone, on 11/01/2007, -4/+12No country with nukes would ever use them because of three words: Mutually Assured Destruction. Even if Iran got nuclear weapons, they wouldn't touch the US, or any other country. They know that an offensive nuclear strike would result in the rest of the world using nukes in retaliation.
- adgreene, on 10/31/2007, -3/+11That's proof they're hiding it!!!!!!
/sarcasm - nblsavage, on 10/31/2007, -4/+12Racist much?
- jonnyeuchre, on 10/31/2007, -3/+11High energy prices = record oil profit = record soft money contributions
- ironhide, on 10/29/2007, -1/+9Enough to know that everyone named Mohammed isn't a killer.
- kilofox, on 10/30/2007, -1/+9FTA..
However, he (ElBaradei) said that in the current dispute, "we cannot give Iran a pass right now, because there is still a lot of question marks." - MWeather, on 10/31/2007, -0/+7So you're saying we shouldn't follow the anti-proliferation treaty? Isn't that opening up a dangerous precedent?
- Putts335, on 10/29/2007, -2/+9Are you really so brainwashed as to think what you just wrote was true?
Wow..... - MWeather, on 10/30/2007, -3/+10I hear that after they detonate the nukes in our cities, they'll feast on our charred remains.
- williamdyer, on 10/31/2007, -2/+8Oh, so those Blackwater murderers are Moslems now?
- Klak, on 10/29/2007, -0/+6so you're a very specific bigot. good job
- mojoel, on 10/29/2007, -0/+6Even >I< knew he was being sarcastic.
- Breepee, on 10/31/2007, -0/+6I would rather live happy in ignorance and suddenly find a bomb on my head than live in fear of bombs that don't exist and never drop.
- beatoven, on 10/30/2007, -2/+8Why can't Iran make nuke weapons if everyone else can?
The UN should get all the countries who already have nuclear weapons to destroy or disarm them or whatever! - Putts335, on 10/29/2007, -0/+5Not a fan of 'leftists'....but you're right, it is a pretty stupid argument.
Especially considering how many other, more effective arguments, there are for this debate. - Eldavidos, on 10/29/2007, -0/+5You didn't mention any Japanese cities!
The only people to ever deploy nuclear weapons against civilians (or indeed anyone) are Uncle Sam's good 'ol boys! Remember that while waving your flag and lapping up the latest Bill O'Reilly rants.
Iran aren't stupid enough to deploy nukes because if they fired one nuke, their entire country would be flattened within minutes and they know it. It's for protection so that a bunch of hicks don't wander through their nation raping their people and natural resources. They saw what happened in Iraq. - leetleo, on 10/29/2007, -1/+6Sigh. I really didn't think a /sarcasm was necessary for that one.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 315 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is