What is Digg?Sponsored by Rockstar Games
Grand Theft Auto: Episodes from Liberty City view!
rockstargames.com - Out Now on Disc for Xbox 360. Includes The Lost and Damned plus the all-new The Ballad of Gay Tony.
673 Comments
- Ikey, on 01/24/2008, -13/+726Maybe dey shoulda used them there dianetics
- Sub7, on 01/24/2008, -26/+712***** the RIAA
- capiCrimm, on 01/24/2008, -5/+389I'm waiting for Anonymous send in the exploding vans.
- inactive, on 01/24/2008, -14/+305damn ebaumsworld, they're at it again
- theojanke, on 01/24/2008, -10/+266[This comment was funny 3 days ago, for 2 minutes]
- dondara, on 01/24/2008, -6/+196Anon delivers ...a clamhead ass beating. ***** CoS
- smacksaw, on 01/24/2008, -12/+198I guess the new algorithm's key phrase is "not a joke"
From now on, no more all-caps "AMAZING" to start my submissions. Nope, it's going to have "not a joke" in it. Front page success, here I come! Eat my ass msaleem! - IHaveIssues, on 01/24/2008, -2/+164This is fun to follow. :-)
- 350Zed, on 01/24/2008, -2/+146Can't Tom Cruise use his ability to fix anything with his mind to fix the Internet too?
- H3LLSL337, on 01/24/2008, -1/+131I'm starting to think that all of these people asking, "Why don't we do this religion next?" or "Why just this one?" are $eaOrg Psyops. Seriously, how many times has it been said that the reason nobody is going to go after them, is because no other religion charges money to ascend in the rankings. No ohter religion *forces* you to pay money. There is tithing, but that is completely voluntary. You don't have to tithe if you don't want to, if fact, if you never tithed, I dare say *nothing* would happen to you. You would still be allowed to go to church, still be part of the congregation.
This is a cult, plain and simple. To the people that say, oh, a couple hundred years is what separates a cult from religion, you're wrong. There are very specific things that mark it as a cult. For instance, claiming to have "secret knowledge" that only the select can have access. For instance, Branch Davidians, or Mormons.
Cults display excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law. L. Ron anyone?
The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities). Fair game?
There's lots more, see:
http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm
for all of them. But you should remember, this isn't someone picking on someone because of religion, that's what the $cientogists want you to believe, that this is about religion. It's not, it's about suing everyone that criticizes them. Taking down videos on youtube because it puts them in a bad light. ***** them. - FunkyWitDaSysTm, on 01/24/2008, -2/+130"you either do it, or you don't!"
- warsd4, on 01/24/2008, -29/+114Ron Paul
- SevenTwo, on 01/24/2008, -4/+85Pools closed.
- Klowner, on 01/24/2008, -5/+84Because they aren't. Well, perhaps besides Westboro "Baptist" Church, but they're technically not Christians anyway.
- NSMike, on 01/24/2008, -0/+74He's too busy driving by accidents and doing something about them. Didn't you hear? He's the only one who can help.
- somedirtbag, on 01/24/2008, -0/+62Holy *****! They can divide by zero! They can't be stopped!!
- captainspud, on 01/24/2008, -11/+70Maybe it's just me, but I fail to see how slowed-down websites are going to get cult members deprogrammed.
All you're doing is throwing bricks through their windows. You're not actually accomplishing anything. - bsgunn, on 01/24/2008, -3/+60I hope the kick the ***** out of scientology today and everyday after
- stronglikedan, on 01/24/2008, -5/+61It's not reallythe truth though. Christian zealots are just as bad (Westboro for example). Not all christians are brainwashed zealots...but all scientologists are.
- Archcoder, on 01/24/2008, -5/+60eBaum's did it for sure.
- noahhoward, on 01/24/2008, -2/+56Pyramid schemes involving kidnapping and murder are generally not allowed in your first amendment rights.
- inactive, on 01/24/2008, -4/+56Operation Clambake: http://www.xenu.net/
- inactive, on 01/24/2008, -1/+52well i really am wondering why nobody's done this to the RIAA/MPAA yet. if anybody deserves it...it's them, and their parasitic lawfirms, ***** worthless vampires.
- Rorsach, on 01/24/2008, -11/+57All the Scientology Church has to do is wait 2 weeks until this blows over. No major news-site is going to pick up on this and the internet generation is famous for its short attention span. No one will remember this next month.
- Hauk2004, on 01/24/2008, -3/+48Go Project Chanology!
- Perfectsound, on 01/24/2008, -4/+43I don't know how to put this... PWND!
- whiledo, on 03/25/2009, -6/+44Shut up shut up shut up! This is our best chance at getting the stain of ebaum off the internet! At least 4chan has those adorable lolcats.
- konk3r, on 01/24/2008, -1/+37The RIAA and MPAA are greedy, yes, however the CoS is actually destroying families, infiltrating the government with projects like operation "snow white", taking over towns with things like "project Normandy", and literally getting away with murder (check out whyaretheydead.net). The RIAA may win lawsuits with people over ***** laws, but the CoS steals and/or destroys government documents on them in the middle of serious court cases to force the government to drop the cases due to lack of evidence. To my knowledge people who appose the RIAA have never had personal information, criminal history, license plate number or even social security number posted on the Internet or posted up all over the town where they live; never had their neighbors called and told spurious stories about them being a sex offender. The RIAA is a bitch, the Co$ needs to be destroyed.
- Klarth, on 01/24/2008, -7/+41All Scientologists need to buy dogs.
- chaosium, on 01/24/2008, -8/+41"The people doing this are literally no better than the scientologists themselves"
You know nothing about the Church of Scientology and should probably stay out of this while the adults talk. - zathlazip, on 01/24/2008, -11/+43I was a proud frequenter of the...uh...eBaumsworld...for a couple years there, and I only stopped about a month ago because "Anonymous" itself had become frighteningly cultish.
I'll all for the lulz. The lulz are great, and the Scientologists deserve the attacks mightily. But, thinking of a bunch of dark-humored internet pranksters as your secret circle and doing their bidding as such is creepy too, and very much not as lulzy. Anonymous would make a horrible "Fight Club." - bolognium, on 01/24/2008, -1/+33it's "them thar" - a true redneck would know this.
- bennovw, on 01/24/2008, -0/+31Well, it reduces their online presence for one, and can be tied in with other tactics to bring the Co$ to their knees.
Btw, if people threw bricks through your windows 24/7 wouldn't you just pack up and leave? - cr3ative, on 01/24/2008, -3/+34Murk lore.
- inactive, on 01/24/2008, -2/+33If I had a ton of money, I'd probably install laser turrets and kill you when you passed by.
- capiCrimm, on 01/24/2008, -3/+33Lulz > xenu
- chaosium, on 01/24/2008, -2/+31It was *****, as anything that comes from "top diggers".
- ellimist, on 01/24/2008, -0/+28RTFA. It's not about religion, it's about the ***** the Scientology organizations have done to people.
- hoowahman, on 01/24/2008, -3/+31wtf is up with this crap?
- Exclip, on 01/24/2008, -2/+29because scientology is a cult
- borez, on 01/24/2008, -0/+27Their sites don't seem particularly slow to me?
- dementedd, on 01/24/2008, -1/+27That was top digg users BAAAAWWWing
- whiledo, on 03/25/2009, -0/+25Oh yeah, well it'll be ***** DRAFTY in there!
- br0ck, on 01/24/2008, -0/+25DDoSing the website are likely useless, but it does get press. When you put the press together with all the various other things like hosting the videos despite takedown notices, distributing the private expensive docs, and hosting clambake then at some point critical mass is reached and all the abuses and craziness of the cult become known to more and more people, and the more people that know about all of the bad things the fewer people there are that will conned by the free IQ test and end up brainwashed and broke. Hopefully, all people will soon walk by their booths and instead of being curious, they'll be thinking 'hey, that's that loony space cult that messed up Tom Cruise and destroys people's lives and steals their money'.
- Velirno, on 01/24/2008, -1/+25I dunno... If it's big enough, the internet generation will stick to it. After all look at the RIAA/MPAA. We haven't let up on those bastards for years.
- stronglikedan, on 01/24/2008, -2/+26The attack on scientology is more "necessary" than "funny".
- PhilMoskowitz, on 01/24/2008, -1/+24cultish? more like a dark anarchy and memetic. I never found anyone trying to organize .. ebaums.. outside of raids etc.
- julianrod, on 01/24/2008, -4/+27WTF?
- flxfxp, on 01/24/2008, -0/+22shh, you kill the plan!
- br0ken1128, on 01/24/2008, -0/+21You can't win a fair game if your opponent doesn't play fairly .. Scientology is all about looking good but being underhanded tactically.. If you oppose scientology you are essentially a suppressive person:
Suppressive acts are clearly those covert or overt acts knowingly calculated to reduce or destroy the influence or activities of Scientology or prevent case gains or continued Scientology success and activity on the part of a Scientologist. As persons or groups that would do such a thing act out of self-interest only to the detriment of others, they cannot be granted the rights ordinarily accorded rational beings."» — L. Ron Hubbard, HCOPL of 5 April 1965, "HANDLING THE SUPPRESSIVE PERSON"
As a suppressive person, you are considered "Fair Game"
A truly Suppressive Person or group has no rights of any kind as Scientologists and actions taken against them are not punishable under Scientology Ethics Codes.» — L. Ron Hubbard, HCOPL of 23 December 1965, "Ethics, Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists"
SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.» — L. Ron Hubbard, HCOPL of 18 October 1967, "PENALTIES FOR LOWER CONDITIONS"
Source: http://www.xenu-directory.net/practices/sp.html -
Show 51 - 100 of 679 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is