Introducing Digg Dialogg!
Check out the first Digg Dialogg with Nancy Pelosi. More guests to be announced soon!
The Palestinian Representative Mistakenly Signed Agreement
ynetnews.com — Unbelievable!!! The Palestinian Representative to the "peace talks" with the Terror Organization Hamas, has Mistakenly Signed Agreement. Top aides to Palestinian President Abbas distance themselves from Yemeni plan outlining path to reconciliation with Hamas
courtneymilsson- 147 diggs
- digg it
- dandan111, on 03/24/2008, -31/+24All of the Palestinian actions are unbelievable. Avoid peace, teach hate, promote ignorance, use violence, steal money, impoverish people...What if they were normal? They could have a decent life and so could Israel. Why don't they want that?
- quaxon, on 03/24/2008, -18/+11you sure you dont mean the zionist jews?
- IKORKYI, on 03/25/2008, -2/+5yes
- oldhick, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Take your antisemitism somewhere else. There are plenty of ethnic groups that carry the Zionist mantle, not just those of jewish dissent.
- carpespasm, on 03/24/2008, -6/+5They want it, but they want it on their terms and neither side is willing to back down or admit wrong-doing on their part. That and having faith that anything they do is in the good favor of God helps too. Why back down even a little when the ruler of all of existence is in your corner?
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -9/+3Easily said by someone who believes that same G-d has made them the chosen people and has given them an area of land. and also given them the right to massacre and enslave millions to get it.
Then again it's the standard glaring hypocrisy from your crew.- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -0/+3Nah, you're not anti-semitic. Right?
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -9/+3Easily said by someone who believes that same G-d has made them the chosen people and has given them an area of land. and also given them the right to massacre and enslave millions to get it.
- Qtip42, on 03/25/2008, -10/+5Hey dope, it takes two to tango. Israel is no different. Both sides are destined to be eradicated
- vault, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_equivalence
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -6/+2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_facie
- vault, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_equivalence
- JimmySpaza, on 03/25/2008, -6/+13The Palestinians don't want it because, regardless of their public statements, they still want to push Israel into the sea...just like their now-deceased leader Yasser Arafat declared.
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -10/+7Likud *****
A classic redundant phrase- IKORKYI, on 03/25/2008, -0/+4classic redundant huh
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -11/+6Spaztic, are you referring to the same Yasser Arafat that bent over backwards to accomodate the Israelis in treaty after treaty, in negotiation after negotiation, only to be betrayed time and time again by the zionists?
- foopirata, on 03/25/2008, -0/+7"Following the Oslo Accords, Israelis and Americans alike shared the hope that Yasser Arafat, who headed the Fatah terror organization before Israel controlled the West Bank and Gaza and took over as Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) chairman in 1968 vowing to destroy the Jewish state, had at last turned the corner and would lead the Palestinian people to accept Israel and make peace with the Jewish state. Instead, Arafat began to violate his agreements with Israel and the United States almost immediately just as he had violated every other agreement he had ever concluded, including those with Arab leaders. The section on Arafat’s pattern of deception and death underscores Jordan’s late King Hussein’s apt reported characterization, namely that Arafat “never came to a bridge he didn’t double-cross.” "
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:uxu4OTW7MOIJ: ... - yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -0/+6No, he was referring to the same Yasser Arafat that insisted on accepting the Nobel Peace Prize dressed in a military uniform.
So much for bending over backwards to accomodate the Zionists. Looks like he even got the Europeans to bend over backwards and do a back-flip.
- foopirata, on 03/25/2008, -0/+7"Following the Oslo Accords, Israelis and Americans alike shared the hope that Yasser Arafat, who headed the Fatah terror organization before Israel controlled the West Bank and Gaza and took over as Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) chairman in 1968 vowing to destroy the Jewish state, had at last turned the corner and would lead the Palestinian people to accept Israel and make peace with the Jewish state. Instead, Arafat began to violate his agreements with Israel and the United States almost immediately just as he had violated every other agreement he had ever concluded, including those with Arab leaders. The section on Arafat’s pattern of deception and death underscores Jordan’s late King Hussein’s apt reported characterization, namely that Arafat “never came to a bridge he didn’t double-cross.” "
- MarkusGarvey, on 03/25/2008, -6/+5don't you see!!!...this is a fricken setup!!...nobody signed anything by mistake....just a big frickin monkey wrench..your ignorance has blinded you..there is both Israeli and Hamas ***** on this stick..
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -0/+3When in doubt - blame Israel, eh?
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -10/+7Likud *****
- quaxon, on 03/24/2008, -18/+11you sure you dont mean the zionist jews?
- neko6, on 03/24/2008, -12/+27How can you "mistakenly" sign an agreement...? Especially one that is only a general agreement to reconcile?
The corruption of the Palestinian leadership is so deep, it is probably the main obstacle to peace in the region - not this or that piece of land.- Dumbledorito, on 03/24/2008, -4/+5Well, you know those things where they keep the white copy, you keep the yellow copy, and the pink copy gets filed?
You never check to see if the yellow and pink ones say the same thing...- FatLoser, on 03/25/2008, -5/+6How the hell could they say anything but what was on the white one? Do you understand the concept of a carbon copy? It's not just for email anymore. I swear to god there are way too many people who just like to troll on here without contributing anything.
- Dumbledorito, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Point the first: Pre-printed forms are a new technology to you, are they? I can print "you" on one page, "are" on another, and "a tool" on a third, slap them together and have you put an "X" on what just appears to say "you."
Point the second: Troll? It was a joke. I didn't say anything remotely offensive in my post.
Point the third: "Not contributing anything?" How did you find the internet, and what had you heard about it previously?
- Dumbledorito, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Point the first: Pre-printed forms are a new technology to you, are they? I can print "you" on one page, "are" on another, and "a tool" on a third, slap them together and have you put an "X" on what just appears to say "you."
- FatLoser, on 03/25/2008, -5/+6How the hell could they say anything but what was on the white one? Do you understand the concept of a carbon copy? It's not just for email anymore. I swear to god there are way too many people who just like to troll on here without contributing anything.
- MarkusGarvey, on 03/25/2008, -6/+4Not only the Palestinian leadership neko....so i agree with most of your comment...mark my words that the Likud has their ***** hooks in this too...
- hadees, on 03/25/2008, -2/+5So you are claiming Likud some magical way mislead the chief Palestinian negotiator into thinking Abbas wanted him to sign an agreement with Hamas? That has to be one of the craziest conspiracy theories I have hear on digg recently. Just goes to show you the scope isn't always as important.
- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -1/+4I think Likud killed his dog, too.
- hadees, on 03/25/2008, -2/+5So you are claiming Likud some magical way mislead the chief Palestinian negotiator into thinking Abbas wanted him to sign an agreement with Hamas? That has to be one of the craziest conspiracy theories I have hear on digg recently. Just goes to show you the scope isn't always as important.
- Tralobyte, on 03/25/2008, -0/+3Maybe the submitter means that signing the agreement was a mistake, and he/she really needs lessons in English.
- Edwaldo, on 03/25/2008, -1/+1Maybe it wasn't a mistake, some radicals would like to see reconciliation with Hamas.
- Dumbledorito, on 03/24/2008, -4/+5Well, you know those things where they keep the white copy, you keep the yellow copy, and the pink copy gets filed?
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/24/2008, -22/+23Maybe both sides of the Palestinian government, the elected one and the Vichy one, are just sick and tired of the repression and suffering caused by the Israelis. They get tired of stuff like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw_Px5cJIyI- DreadPirate, on 03/24/2008, -15/+20Or maybe this is just another demonstration of how untrustworthy they are - something you and your brethren refuse to acknowledge
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -10/+8ButtPirate, who could be less trustworthy than a government that consistently makes promises about honoring treaties, yet continues to defiantly build illegal settlements for hundreds of thousands of interlopers?
- DreadPirate, on 03/25/2008, -2/+7Maybe a group that hides weapons and explosives in mosques? Or that stages funerals of hundreds specifically for the consumption of western media?
- JimmySpaza, on 03/26/2008, -1/+4DreadPirate makes some good points, dude. You have to admit that. See, DreadPirate gives concrete examples...and your replies where just inuendo and emotion-based hyperbole. Give us a reason to believe that the Palestinians are not trying to destroy Israel.
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -10/+8ButtPirate, who could be less trustworthy than a government that consistently makes promises about honoring treaties, yet continues to defiantly build illegal settlements for hundreds of thousands of interlopers?
- carterbaldwin, on 03/24/2008, -2/+6I was hoping to get rickrolled.
- JimmySpaza, on 03/25/2008, -12/+13Your anti-Israel propaganda is tiresome and has been debunked time and time again. Why keep making reference to it?
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -10/+11Because the debunking has been completely debunked time and time and time again, so why do you keep claiming it?
- Kizilbash, on 03/25/2008, -4/+4Hahaha, debunked by you? Puh-lease. Read a book or twenty and then come back and try again...
- DreadPirate, on 03/24/2008, -15/+20Or maybe this is just another demonstration of how untrustworthy they are - something you and your brethren refuse to acknowledge
- Kizilbash, on 03/24/2008, -10/+18Israel and the US have worked so hard to turn Mahmoud Abbas into their Mangosuthu Buthelezi and now this! We need the Palestinians as weak and divided as necessary!
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -1/+2Heavens forbid you should acknowledge any sort of Palestinian responsibility for their sad state.
- JlmAWP, on 03/24/2008, -8/+27How about we let THEM sort it out, and pay attention to all our failing economy over here.
- Wiini, on 03/25/2008, -5/+2JImAWP, I'm adding you as a friend. No no, I haven't looked at your previous comments, to see if you and I are politically similiar. For all I know, you're an evil liberal democrat while I'm a greedy selfish conservative. But that doesn't matter, because you and I both care about the same problems, and together, a solution is bound to be found!
- americangoy, on 03/25/2008, -6/+4Cant have that man.
After all, Iraq is Israel's war. The US has no interest in Iraq, and please tell me what the interest of the USA is in attacking Iran... and then Syria?
Google PNAC.- hadees, on 03/25/2008, -2/+6Yeah the US has not interest in Iraq. Pay no attention to the vast amount of oil in the country or the fact it was run by a dictator who constantly snubbed his noise at the United States.
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -6/+3Yeah that oil has worked out real well for us, you idiot. And if we went after every dictator who snubbed their nose at us, we'd be in forty or fifty regional wars at any one time.
If you really believe that and aren't just doing you job regurgitating old propaganda, I pity you. - Kizilbash, on 03/25/2008, -4/+3Yeah, that must have been a bummer. And after you went to all that trouble to install him and arm him against Iran! The nerve of some people!
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -6/+3Yeah that oil has worked out real well for us, you idiot. And if we went after every dictator who snubbed their nose at us, we'd be in forty or fifty regional wars at any one time.
- hadees, on 03/25/2008, -2/+6Yeah the US has not interest in Iraq. Pay no attention to the vast amount of oil in the country or the fact it was run by a dictator who constantly snubbed his noise at the United States.
- Wiini, on 03/25/2008, -5/+2JImAWP, I'm adding you as a friend. No no, I haven't looked at your previous comments, to see if you and I are politically similiar. For all I know, you're an evil liberal democrat while I'm a greedy selfish conservative. But that doesn't matter, because you and I both care about the same problems, and together, a solution is bound to be found!
- evilcaptain, on 03/24/2008, -3/+19Wow... so many uneducated comments. Please read up before posting.
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -8/+10A good place to start is with Phyllis Bennis'
Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Palestinian-Is ...- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Here is a better place to start
http://digg.com/politics/The_60_Year_War_For_Israe ...
- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Here is a better place to start
- neocognitism, on 03/25/2008, -9/+7And by uneducated you mean anything by Jimmy Spaza, neko6, DreadPirate, dandan111, and vault. All willfully biased and deceitful Ziontologists.
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -2/+3*Yawn*
What was that about regurgitation earlier?
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -2/+3*Yawn*
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -8/+10A good place to start is with Phyllis Bennis'
- whatthefu, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5Oops?
- backintheday, on 03/25/2008, -5/+8no offense to Israel and Palestine but we have our own (very serious) problems we need to sort out.
- yellowcakewalk, on 03/25/2008, -9/+11I don't mind offending the Likudnik Israelis. We want our money back from you. We will prosecute your spies Rosen, Weissman, Feith, and Perle. Stop ***** over our country. Take Joe Lieberman back home.
- MarkusGarvey, on 03/25/2008, -6/+7it is all connected...
- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -4/+6That's right. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. There is nothing wrong with your television. We, the Jews, now control the transmission. We control the horizontal, and the vertical. We can make you attack Iran, and be friends with Saudi Arabia. We can also make you hop on one foot, while singing Hava Nagila. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hava_Nagila
- ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -7/+5OH quit playing the persecuted little goat herder.
You know damn well what zionism is. You know damn well it's based on racist supremacy. And everybody else does too.
And they're starting to find out about your little christian friends too, you know, the ones who invented a country based on the ***** old testament for you?- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -0/+7"You know damn well what zionism is."
Indeed, I do. It is Jewish nationalism. It is the idea that the Jews should have a country of their own in their ancestral homeland. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zionism
"You know damn well it's based on racist supremacy."
Really? Is that why most of the Jews repatriated to Israel in the past year were from Ethiopia? Is that why Israel has granted asylum to refugees from Darfur? In any case, what is racist or supremacist about a people wanting independence? Is the Kurdish or Basque struggle for independence based on racist supremacy? How about Kosovo?
"And they're starting to find out about your little christian friends too, you know, the ones who invented a country based on the ***** old testament for you?"
And all this time I thought it was the British, who promised the Jews an independent country. Go figure. It must have been American Evangelicals posing as British officials. Why knew they could do the British accent so well? - wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5That was "Who knew" of course. Sorry for the typo.
- ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -5/+3There's no such thing as an ancestral homeland.
Would you agree to make europe white again? How about a big White Christian state? We don't have those.
"ancestral homeland." Also used by Hitler to describe Germany. It's racist.
"I thought it was the British"
And the British are not Christian since... When exactly?
"American Evangelicals"
Funny how you know exactly who I'm talking about without me ever mentioning it. - wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -1/+5"There's no such thing as an ancestral homeland. "
Tell that to the Native Americans. Or to the 3rd generation descendants of Palestinian Arabs for that matter.
"Would you agree to make europe white again? How about a big White Christian state? We don't have those."
That's just neither here nor there. The French, the Germans, and the Ukrainians have their own independent countries. Why can't the Jews? It is called the right of self-determination. Granting this right to some ethnic groups and denying it to others is bigoted. Oh, wait, you don't believe that Jews are an ethnic group. Apparently centuries of customs, traditions, language, literature, folklore, and music do not constitute a distinct culture. Maybe that's why back in the USSR people could tell that I am a Jew just by looking at me.
""ancestral homeland." Also used by Hitler to describe Germany. It's racist. "
Hitler also used words like "table" or "chair". Are they racist too?
"Funny how you know exactly who I'm talking about without me ever mentioning it."
I have seen this kind of rhetoric before. - ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -4/+2Ok then glad you agree. Israel is the land of Jesus so Christians should have it. Don't worry, we'll give you nice little ghettos in which you can wait to die.
All the non-whites must leave Europe because centuries of white christian tradition gives us the right to ethnically cleanse our ancestral homeland and deny rights to anyone else.
It's one or the other, either ancestral homelands (I suppose ancestral means old testament in your version of english) justify the authority of a RACE over another, because homeland implies a race, and then we get to expulse jews from anywhere that isn't Israel; or "ancestral homeland" is a racist, stupid, false and degenerative concept that needs to e abolished because it's responsible for EVERY GENOCIDE this world has ever known.
And you're a nazi.
- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -0/+7"You know damn well what zionism is."
- ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -7/+5OH quit playing the persecuted little goat herder.
- wpi97, on 03/25/2008, -4/+6That's right. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. There is nothing wrong with your television. We, the Jews, now control the transmission. We control the horizontal, and the vertical. We can make you attack Iran, and be friends with Saudi Arabia. We can also make you hop on one foot, while singing Hava Nagila. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hava_Nagila
- ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -6/+1Why do you think you are in Iraq?
- MASH007, on 03/25/2008, -9/+1ynet??? For the love of digg, please don't tell me this source is gonna hit the front page.
- w3bsag3, on 03/25/2008, -2/+6It's about time Israel declared that it signed the Oslo suicide pact because of a mixup too.
- zolthar, on 03/25/2008, -3/+11lol
Let me summarize the Anti Israeli point of view here:
There are two sides for this argument, Fatah and Hamas, and one of them is completely guilty or both share the guilt at some level.
Conclusion: blame Israel.- Kizilbash, on 03/25/2008, -7/+2Yes, there are two sides, let's examine them: until the 1980s the only competition to the relatively secular nationalist Fatah came from the marxist groups PFLP (Ppular Ront for the Liberation of Palestinae) and DFLP (Democratic Front etc) and groups tied to an Arab regime, like al-Saiqa (set up by Syria) and the ALF (Arab Liberation Fron, set up by Iraq). Then in 1987 the first Intifada broke out and a new group emerged, Hamas, the military branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Israel supported Hamas, pretty much like South Africa supported Buthelezi as he broke away from the ANC, sometimes with weapons or financial aid, sometimes by removing their rivals. Then in the 1990s after the Oslo Accords Israel started playing the Fatah-'government' and Hamas against each other. Now before the last elections the US insisted on, Israel and the US tried to get a Fatah victory and then refused to acknowledge that Hamas had won and deal with them. They supported Fatah with weapons and money and even trained Fatah men in Jordan (they still do, but it is not exactly a big success). They then supported a military attempt by Fatah to take over the Gaza Strip, Hamas' major stronghold. That failed miserably and Hamas took over militarily instead. Since then Israel and the US are still doing their utmost to keep Fatah and Hamas from reconciling and working together.
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -0/+5Sure Kizilbash: Israel "plays" Hamas vs. Fatah, the US vs. the rest of the world, Spy vs. Spy...
- mmmmmbiscuits, on 03/26/2008, -0/+4Don't forget Shia vs. Sunni! Face it: The Muslim world would totally kick ass and usher in a 21st century renaissance/enlightenment if not for those magnificent heeb bastards...
- yonoz, on 03/25/2008, -0/+5Sure Kizilbash: Israel "plays" Hamas vs. Fatah, the US vs. the rest of the world, Spy vs. Spy...
- Kizilbash, on 03/25/2008, -7/+2Yes, there are two sides, let's examine them: until the 1980s the only competition to the relatively secular nationalist Fatah came from the marxist groups PFLP (Ppular Ront for the Liberation of Palestinae) and DFLP (Democratic Front etc) and groups tied to an Arab regime, like al-Saiqa (set up by Syria) and the ALF (Arab Liberation Fron, set up by Iraq). Then in 1987 the first Intifada broke out and a new group emerged, Hamas, the military branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Israel supported Hamas, pretty much like South Africa supported Buthelezi as he broke away from the ANC, sometimes with weapons or financial aid, sometimes by removing their rivals. Then in the 1990s after the Oslo Accords Israel started playing the Fatah-'government' and Hamas against each other. Now before the last elections the US insisted on, Israel and the US tried to get a Fatah victory and then refused to acknowledge that Hamas had won and deal with them. They supported Fatah with weapons and money and even trained Fatah men in Jordan (they still do, but it is not exactly a big success). They then supported a military attempt by Fatah to take over the Gaza Strip, Hamas' major stronghold. That failed miserably and Hamas took over militarily instead. Since then Israel and the US are still doing their utmost to keep Fatah and Hamas from reconciling and working together.
- ElAssoWipo, on 03/25/2008, -4/+4And then they sharpened their horns and went flying out the window on their evil broomsticks, followed by a hord of flying monkeys.
"one said an Abbas envoy only signed the document because of a mixup."
Oh one! I know him! The guy with the hair, right?
This is one of the worst propaganda pieces I've ever seen in my life. - WaltDismal, on 03/25/2008, -5/+3This is why no aliens ever make contact with Earth. They know better than to make friends with a species that's going to self-extinguish itself.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by