Call for questions
Submit and vote up questions you'd like to see answered by Kevin & Jay at the next Digg Townhall on 11/18.
Saudi Marriage Official Says 1-Year-Old Brides OK
foxnews.com — Call it marriage, Islamic style. Saudi marriage officiant Dr. Ahmad al-Mu'bi told Lebanese television viewers last week that it's permissible for girls as young as 1 to marry - as long as sex is postponed.
Ghostman555- 27 diggs
- digg it
- darnedsocks, on 06/25/2008, -2/+4IT VARIES BY TRADITION?! WHAT THE .....! HOW ABOUT WHEN THE GIRL BECOMES A FULL GROWN WOMAN AT 18 AND CAN CHOOSE WHEN AND WITH WHOM?!
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -6/+1Just for the record....statistics show that prearranged marriages endure the test of time, especially when compared to those "full grown women at 18 who choose when and with whom" they wish to enter into marriage.
This brings to mind the edict in old Judaic customs that says that a family could disinherit or abandon their own biological offspring, but it was forbidden to abandon or disown any adopted offspring because the adopted children were "chosen" to be a part of that family. The same principle should apply in marriage. If you "choose" your own spouse then divorce should be forbidden, however if you marry as a result of prearranged marriages, then divorce would still be an option. (At least the statistics show that prearranged marriages are much more successful than when someone chooses a partner based solely on "feelings").- curtisag, on 06/26/2008, -0/+5Who gives a ***** how long it lasts? If a woman is my slave, there's a good chance she won't be divorcing me anytime soon. That's pretty much what this is. Legalized female slavery and bondage from birth. Women in the middle east are treated like sub-humans.
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -6/+1Just for the record....statistics show that prearranged marriages endure the test of time, especially when compared to those "full grown women at 18 who choose when and with whom" they wish to enter into marriage.
- ProudPagan, on 06/25/2008, -1/+7I won't even call these people animals because animals are much more humane. Women are nothing but chattel to these people. Any country that does not treat women with the same dignity and respect as men, is one to be very afraid of.
- Queenwemo, on 06/25/2008, -0/+7Muslims keep saying that all their laws of restriction on women is "for their own safety and virtue", however how can it ever be "safe" or "virtuous" to sell a baby-girl into a lifetime of servitude (slavery)?. The virtue and morality of Islam is fed from and reinforced by the male "member" (and I'm not talking about a group!).
According to what the Imams have said to us Westerners, the basic tenets of Islam are the repression of anything not masculine and conformatory.
Yeah, like the FIRST thing I want is to be treated worse than an animal.- bosssmiley, on 06/26/2008, -0/+3S'right. But then what do you expect of a religion that grew out of a tribal culture where the standard way of obtaining a bride (if none of your nieces were available) was by kidnapping her from a neighbouring tribe then *maybe* haggling over the dowry with her family afterwards? That was still standard practise in some of the more backwards parts of Saudi as recently as 50-odd years ago.
- Isidore, on 06/25/2008, -0/+6From the video:
"The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was six, but he had sex with her only when she was nine."
When non-Muslims say this they are called Islamophobes.
For the hadith sources of this "beautiful example of conduct" of the 'Mercy of Mankind' see
http://www.islam-watch.org/alisina/AishaChildWife. ...
Muhammad also killed hundreds of Jewish prisoners of war AFTER they surrendered at Banu Qurazya. Took the women into slavery and raped them. Tortured a man called Kinana to make him reveal where he had buried treasure, then killed him after he said where it was hidden. Most Muslims don't know this. No 'inner Jihad' here.
Muhammad was not your average holy man - Buddah and Jesus did not do this sort of thing even though some of their followers behave badly.- Nannybell, on 06/26/2008, -0/+1They aren't following Jesus when they behave badly.
- Ghostman555, on 06/25/2008, -0/+1 Honest to God, what is wrong with these people? Are their head rag's too tight? Treating women like this? A little 1yr old baby, contracted for marriage, and then what? The environment declare's when consemating the marriage is right? Is it true that the Islam is more populus than anyother religion on earth? Why? Like the person right above me says, "treated worse than an animal." Damn, it's true, it's the honest truth!!!!! I hate to be the one to sterotype, but just look at that man's pic. And, he is making the rules. But hey, they control the oil. hahahahahaha. "Bastards",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Ghostman
- skeletonkeeper, on 06/25/2008, -3/+9And these are the people that the Dems and Libs keep cramming down our throats that we are supposed to be understanding of and tolerant with??!!?? Enough is enough. And these are some of the same people Obama wants to sit down and talk with over tea and cookies.....
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -5/+3Skeletonkeeper, I agree with your sentiments completely! This is what we have to look forward too for the next 4 yrs if the libs get their way...
(And I apologize in advance now that my simply commenting to your reply will trigger the castigating remarks of Lydecker and his trusty little lackey eir.....)- KCLorelei39, on 06/26/2008, -4/+2Sandy wrote: "(And I apologize in advance now that my simply commenting to your reply will trigger the castigating remarks of Lydecker and his trusty little lackey eir.....) "
Sandy, you only have to speak, and they appear....
It's too predictably funny - just like Boris and Natasha, aren't they?
It's also fun to see how long they'll keep slugging away to win the hollow victory of getting the last word.
(they can win this one by default as I'm not planning on reading their responses)- sconnor, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Pure patriarchal insanity & misogynistic!
- KCLorelei39, on 06/26/2008, -4/+2Sandy wrote: "(And I apologize in advance now that my simply commenting to your reply will trigger the castigating remarks of Lydecker and his trusty little lackey eir.....) "
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -5/+3Skeletonkeeper, I agree with your sentiments completely! This is what we have to look forward too for the next 4 yrs if the libs get their way...
- exgop, on 06/25/2008, -2/+5The Cult of Islam is corrupt. The fact that they treat women as property should make every liberal a war hark. Their hatred for republicans blinds them.
- DesertDad, on 06/25/2008, -1/+4We can bet the darlings of Hollywood and Harvard will continue to fawn over the likes of Dr. al-Mu'bi. Yet, if as an American father I protest the Muslim cleric's philosophy as barbaric, they deride me as intolerant and ignorant... .
This hideous practice brings a somber meaning to the expression 'lift the veil from your eyes.' - ozymandias2012, on 06/25/2008, -0/+4I don't care where you're from or what your religion says....human beings should be more advanced than this. I'm suprised they're not bashing women on the head with clubs and dragging them around by their hair.
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+2You know, liberals would definitely disagree with you. After all, they say that "all cultures are equal" and that one is not better than another. In fact, in America, multicultarism demands that you accept all customs, cultures and beliefs as valid and equal. The libs would accuse you of being intolerant, xenophobic and judgemental, so it goes against political correctness to suggest that this cultural belief is somehow "invalid" or "wrong."
- lydecker, on 06/25/2008, -2/+9Way to be wrong, Sandy.
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+2Way to be a typical liberal. You just respond with a knee-jerk attack and don't bother to explain how I'm wrong.
I know that I'm not. I work for the government. I am forced to endure countless lectures and hours of programs that often painstakingly attempt to indoctrinate all us into the multiculturalism cess pool that pretends that there are no "right and wrongs" in other cultures; just misunderstandings. I have been listening to this ***** for nearly 18 years. I know what I observe, I know what I read, and I know what is crammed down our throats at these taxpayer wasting hours of indoctrination. If there's anything I know I'm not wrong about, it's the mindless minutia of multiculturalism. You know that I'm right, you only said I'm wrong because you have a built in reaction to automatically DIGG down anything with my name on it and to criticize and attack me. I'm glad to know I'm so important to you that you don't even have to bother explaining your remarks, you just go through DIGG and start clicking whenever you see a name you hate. Whatever. You're a liberal, no one expects you to have any answers, no one expects you to have any valuable opinions or the capability to think for yourself. Hopefully however, you do have the motor skills to wipe the spit drool from your chin and then go back, regroup and attempt to attack me for something that I really am wrong about, but this? Hell no, I'm absolutely dead on! - lydecker, on 06/25/2008, -2/+11I was uncertain you'd care why you were wrong. And as you pointed out in your article, you claim that you don't care... although you do care enough to comment. I still am unsure, but I will respond.
Liberals do not say all cultures are created equal. Liberals do say that cultural differences need to be observed objectively to come to a conclusion as to what is preferred and what is not. We also understand that people raised in different cultures have different understandings, and it doesn't necessarily make one right or wrong.
Multiculturalism demands that you understand why people do things differently, and respect someone's ability to exercise their legal freedom in their customs and cultures and beliefs.
Liberals would not accuse you of being intolerant for not believing the same thing as someone from a different culture.
It is simply incorrect to judge something as invalid or wrong because it's different and doesn't work in your culture, and the same would work no matter your cultural perspective.
---
I know you don't like people's freedoms, that you would much prefer everyone was exactly like you and that you didn't have to cater to the Constitution and equal treatment. Many of your beliefs are misunderstandings, and many are not. And I know you'd rather indoctrinate people into your way of thinking if you had the power instead of indoctrinating people to be themselves (ooh, how terrible).
You are wrong, I do not have built in reaction to your posts, I have a reaction to comment on things that are blatantly wrong and offensive. You've clearly taken stereotypes of the liberal, and no longer judge them as people, but as a caricature.
You're a divider.
And many people expect me to have answers, and do listen to my posts and respect my opinion. But when you post hate as you do, THAT is what makes people lose respect, not your opinions or different beliefs.
But you've obviously convinced yourself that you can think no wrong. - Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -10/+1"It is simply incorrect to judge something as invalid or wrong because it's different and doesn't work in your culture, and the same would work no matter your cultural perspective."
This, ladies and gentleman, is why liberals are a toxic poison that needs to be erased from the Earth. Lydecker clearly shows in his comment above how he supports this radical Muslim idiot and endorses his comment that it is we Americans who need to just "understand" a different culture and start purchasing our daughers' trousseau while we're shopping for their diapers. Proof positive that liberalism is a mental disease and liberals are incapable of recognizing a wrong.
" I know you don't like people's freedoms, that you would much prefer everyone was exactly like you and that you didn't have to cater to the Constitution and equal treatment."
No, you have it backwards. As a conservative I love freedom and fight for it every day. I LOVE my freedoms and do everything I can do to maintain them. After all, it is the 1st amendment that allows me to state my complete hatred for liberals. I can criticize them, mock them, laugh at them, belittle them, shout at them, make fun of them, insult them, offend them, rebuke them, ignore them, shame them, separate from them, shun them, vote against them, write about them, point fingers at them...yes, I can pretty much do anything short of physically harming them that I damn well want to do - thanks to good old FREEDOM! But I know if we give you liberals enough time, You'll damn well stop that won't you?
It is liberals who work tirelessly to destroy the Constitution and ensure that only child molesters, criminals and perverts are afforded rights. Look at the remarks a liberal congressman made reference innocent children who have been raped: "I'm going to make sure that the rest of their life is ruined, that when they’re 8 years old, they throw up; when they’re 12 years old, they won’t sleep; when they’re 19 years old, they’ll have nightmares and they’ll never have a relationship with anybody.” - This is what you're defending Lydecker? Stand up! Shout it loud and proud! Go ahead and DIGG this down in defense of your precious child molesters. If this is what your equal treatment under the law is, then ***** your equal treatment. I will not hide, I will not be ashamed, I will not backdown from defending the innocent while you and your minions sit there in your utter arrogance and snarl your nose down at me because I dare to give a damn about truth, innocence and real freedom. I defend Constitutional freedoms every day Lydecker, what the hell have you done for your country lately?
"You're a divider"
Thank you. I'll take that as a compliment. No self respecting - or self thinking - individual would want to unite with liberal swine who are hell bent on destroying parental rights, 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendment rights, free market principles, the ability for one to make their own choices and then be held accountable for those choices and other fundamental American rights. Unity is not an American principle. We fought wars to be a separate people. Europe emulates us because we are different. We are superior to all other cultures because we are different. After all, Jesus was a divider too, He said he came to DIVIDE; not to unite. He asked what business does light have with darkness? He said to come out and be SEPARATE. He said He would sort the wheat from the chaff, the sheep from the goats. Of course you've dismissed His comments before, but yet still call him a "loving, respectible, good guy". Well this is twice now you've either denied Him or called Him a liar, so I guess all Christian principles are lost on you. That explains a lot.
And dont bother with your "Messiah complex" drivel..... Nowhere are Christians told to mingle, accept, tolerate or be a part of evil. We need MORE separatism in this country, not more acquiescence of destruction, slavery and poverty.
And finally, I am quite capable of admitting wrong when I am wrong. But I can NEVER be wrong about liberalism being the evil that it is. After all 52 million Americans can't all be wrong! - lydecker, on 06/26/2008, -0/+8You clearly misunderstand again. JUST because something is different doesn't mean it's wrong. You need more than just a judgement based on it being different. I did not say that things that are different cannot be wrong. In this case, the freedoms of the one year old are interpreted to make a rational judgement. I do not support this person's beliefs, and for reasons BEYOND that it is different... I use reason and logic.
So, if you are for freedom, you agree that people of different cultures should be respected, and you are for people practicing their individual cultures as freedoms allow? You didn't seem to. You said multicultural freedom was a bad thing! But you're for it anyway?
"You'll damn well stop that won't you?"
No, I'd like to stop people from promoting hate towards people for their race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation, and I'd like crimes that target people specifically for those reasons to be treated high. But we have freedom of speech, and freedom to be. Why would I stop that?
Liberals have done nothing to ensure that only criminals have rights: people get equal rights... and that includes people convicted of crimes. Child molesters deserve equal rights, criminals deserve equal rights, those who people think are perverts deserve equal rights, and that's in the Constitution. Please tell me how liberals are for rights only for criminals.
No, I'm not defending that quote. And you're not defending all quotes by conservatives, either.
I am proud to know that America is a land of equal opportunity for all, and I completely support that in spite of people who don't want to afford people equal rights. That's the truth, that's freedom.
Liberals are not hell bent on destroying any rights. Jesus was not a divider, Jesus walked with the sinners and brought them to the light... he didn't tell everyone to distance and demonize others.
"After all 52 million Americans can't all be wrong!"
Of course they can. - Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -7/+1Lydecker wrote:
No, I'd like to stop people from promoting hate towards people for their race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation, and I'd like crimes that target people specifically for those reasons to be treated high. But we have freedom of speech, and freedom to be. Why would I stop that?
I'm all for that too! I don't hate people because of their race or their gender or their relgon or their sexual orientation. I only hate liberals because of their political persuasion. By the way, that is perfectly legal. There is no federal protection against political persuasion. You can discriminate against liberals until the cows come home and the law backs you up on that. Incidentally, the same could be said about liberals discriminating against conservatives, it's all perfectly "equal" and legal.
By the Way, that's twice you've called Christ a liar now. Yes, Jesus was a divider. He said so Himself. Look it up! - ssn697, on 06/26/2008, -0/+5I didn't think it was possible, by Sandy1000 has taken the mantle of biggest waste of skin on Digg. What a complete ***** stick, and that comes from a non-Liberal.
The best part of you really did run down your mothers leg... - lydecker, on 06/26/2008, -0/+4Good! So now you can stop lying that liberals want to destroy the first amendment, because you share the same principals of stopping promoting hate and discrimination for race, gender, religion, and sexual orientation.
I'm also aware that politics don't fall under non-discrimination.
And again, I've never called Jesus a liar. The Bible was written by man, and it divides. The Bible contains errors.
And, couldn't you back up some of the things you accused of liberals in your previous posts? Or were you just ranting at that caricature again?
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+2Way to be a typical liberal. You just respond with a knee-jerk attack and don't bother to explain how I'm wrong.
- eir574, on 06/25/2008, -2/+10@Sandy,
You've said that the sooner liberals are wiped off the face of the planet, the better, that you hate them all, and that they're no better than snakes. How ironic that you would say anything about tolerance.- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+1No eir, You misunderstand. I said something about liberals and their so-called tolerance, I never said anything about mine. I never pretended to be tolerant. I have nothing but utter contempt and hatred for all liberals and would be the first to persecute them and their families. They are indeed a cancerous rot on the face of the Earth and like all cancers, we should seek to eradicate them, so sorry if I busted your irony trip.
PS - Stop insulting snakes! - eir574, on 06/25/2008, -1/+10Thanks for the correction, Sandy. I guess I'd thought too highly of you before. When you first said you wanted all liberals to be wiped off the face of the planet, I thought perhaps you were having a bad day. Unless this is just a second bad day, now I know for sure how disgusting you are. Enjoy your hatred -- I know you're proud of it.
- lydecker, on 06/26/2008, -1/+8"PS - Stop insulting snakes!"
Yeah, don't you know they're so smart they were able to convince stupid females that their chance at perfect happiness wasn't good enough if they couldn't take from the tree labeled "GOD ONLY?" - Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -9/+3eir wrote:
Thanks for the correction, Sandy. I guess I'd thought too highly of you before.
(Eyes rolling...)
Liar. You never even came close to it so stop with your pathetic transparent hypocrisy made completely for emotionally driven effect. Do you even read your own posts? Tell me eir.....when have you EVER thought even "mediocre" of me, much less highly? You're not only a liar, but a cheesy one at that. - eir574, on 06/26/2008, -0/+7No, Sandy, I never thought highly of you. I said I thought "too highly" of you before, meaning that my less than mediocre opinion of you was still too high. Go back and read my post, and you'll see that's exactly what I wrote.
- gordonj, on 06/26/2008, -0/+8"I have nothing but utter contempt and hatred for all liberals and would be the first to persecute them and their families."
"is why liberals are a toxic poison that needs to be erased from the Earth."
Wow, so you're a fan of ethnic cleansing then? That's not at all a surprise to me. I've seen lots of fundamentalists ***** like you making statements that would have fit well in Nazi germany or the Khmer Rouge. You are an intolerant, retarded, inhuman turd. Go read your bible and LEARN something from Jesus, hypocrite! - Cate320, on 06/26/2008, -0/+8I don't understand how Sandy can in one breath condemn these islamic practices and call them disgusting... and then in the next ask for liberals to be wiped from the face of the earth.
Do you not realize that if it weren't for liberals, women would be treated like this in our country as well? - Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -9/+1gordon, first off, ***** learn to read you child molesting ape!
I never said a word about ETHNICITY. I said LIBERALS. I don't have a problem with different races, I don't have a problem with different religions, I have a problem with POLITICAL PERSUASIONS. You're a ***** idiot from the get go who apparently not only can't read, but does not understand that political thought is a CHOICE. You CHOOSE to be a liberal you pig, you don't choose to be a Jew or a Cambodian and your strawman argument shows your lack of education. Why don't you write an attack on something you actually read instead of making ***** up. If I say I hate Jews, then you can honestly call me a Nazi. If I ever I say I hate blacks or Asians or Cambodians, then you can call me a Nazi, but right now, I said I hate liberals and if you don't like that ***** YOU. Go back and rot in Hell, who the ***** let you escape anyway?
And by the way, the only ***** you know is that Queen ***** filthy whore mother of yours! - gordonj, on 06/26/2008, -0/+7hey *****,
If you wish to get pedantic, then fine, liberals aren't a different ethnicity, however you have stated that you wish to irradicate an entire group of people (and their families) from the planet. You have shown your true colours fundy! That you are not disseminating this group by their ethnicity, but rather by their political ideologies does little to distance your views from those of megalomaniacal fascist dictators who have instigated ethnic cleansing in the past. I may not agree with many conservative viewpoints, but I would never state that I would like to destroy them and their families. That is the viewpoint of a sociopath. By the way good luck getting into heaven considering it doesn't exist - neither does hell, so the only place I'll be rotting when I die is in the ground, just like you! Hahahaha! You retarded degenerate!
And you need to grow the ***** up and leave "your mother" comments out of this. Aren't you creative enough to insult me directly? - Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -7/+1Gordon, look again. I DID insult you directly you complete illiterate moron, I called you a ***** CHILD MOLESTER, but in typical liberal style you don't see anything wrong with molesting children so of course you ignored that and probably took that as a compliment.
(and you can call me ***** all day long.... I actually don't hold that against you like I would a conservative. Liberals don't know any better. Liberals don't know how to argue or debate without insulting degrading names. Conservatives are more educated, sophisticated and mature. Notice I don't use that kind of language around conservatives because I don't have too. They can understand and communicate without such tripe, but in your case, its permissible because you're not capable of understanding anything of civility, decency and above what you'd hear at the local truckstop, so I have to keep it on a neanderthal level just for you.)
Now back to hating.....Oh yea, have you read anything on Daily Kos lately? You really need to get out of that cave you live in if you think conservatives could ever come close to the kind of vitrolic hatred that liberals spread there. My hatred is child's play there. At least I don't direct my hatred toward any one person, just to the political persuasion of a group. Daily Kos members are terrorists, treasonists and psychopath maniacs that should be locked up, so if you want to hate someone for hating others - go on and troll on over to Daily Kos for a look-see.
And yes, I'm sorry to disappont you, but there IS a Heaven and a Hell, and I'll be getting into Heaven the same way anybody and everybody else will. My ticket has already been purchased. I don't ---no, make that CAN;T, earn my way there. I can't be good enough to get there and I can't be evil enough to be excluded. My own merits are worthless as are yours and everyone other person who ever walked the face of the Earth. I know you don't want to hear this, but where sin aboundeth, grace aboundeth more! Jesus Chist bought my ticket...that's all I need. - gordonj, on 06/26/2008, -0/+6Idiot, I'm aware you called me a child molester. I couldn't care about your insults, because your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. You don't know me and there is no truth in your statement (or most of your statements I have seen), so why should I even bother responding to it? I only made that statement because I feel that it is low to insult somebody associated with the person you're actually trying to insult in order to get a rise out of them - not low enough for you though, as you clearly demonstrated. So go ahead and try to insult my mother if it makes you feel big.
Your statements about liberals and conservatives are way off the mark, for the same reason that making generalisations about any broad group of people will inherently be wrong in many cases. At the end of the day we are all individuals with varying beliefs. You like to lump everyone in together because you are too intellectually lazy to consider a spectrum of cases.
You can make comparisons to the hateful remarks other people make all day long. It is no justification for your hateful remarks. To put it on a level you might understand: If the hateful liberals put their hands in the fire, does that mean you should too, little boy? Why not try thinking for yourself? Oh yeah, that's right, you need an ancient book written by primitives to tell you how to live your life (pity you don't listen to its teachings a bit more, you probably wouldn't be as hate-filled).
Got any objective evidence for heaven or hell? Didn't think so. And you think I'm stupid for not playing make-believe? (that's a rhetorical question - no need to answer it). Also, it seems like quite a convenient belief that no matter how you act you will still get in as long as you think a certain thing. In fact it seems to completely negate the reasons for there being a heaven and a hell in the first place.
So did you or did you not say: "I have nothing but utter contempt and hatred for all liberals and would be the first to persecute them and their families."
You call yourself a christian? Then act like one.
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+1No eir, You misunderstand. I said something about liberals and their so-called tolerance, I never said anything about mine. I never pretended to be tolerant. I have nothing but utter contempt and hatred for all liberals and would be the first to persecute them and their families. They are indeed a cancerous rot on the face of the Earth and like all cancers, we should seek to eradicate them, so sorry if I busted your irony trip.
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -7/+1eir, stop spinning. You're caught. You lied and it's on digits for everyone to read. You can't think TOO highly of someone if you don't think highly of them to begin with. You're busted. Now go on and play and make spit circles in your drivel... and leave the blogs to the grown ups.
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -4/+1Cate, maybe it would be more palatable if I couched it in terms of.... wipe liberalism from the face of the Earth? Some Muslims are conservative in thought and practice, not all of them are liberals, but the ones who are liberals are just pure evil and continue to practice evil. If someone bakes bread for a living, don't you call them a baker? If someone runs for office, don't you call them a politician? If someone practices medicine, don't you call them a healer/physician? Well someone who believes, lobbies for, endorses, condones and argues for liberal ideas and policies are liberals and they only serve to destroy freedom, liberty and self-government of all others. There's nothing immoral or wrong with hating those who conspire to deprive me or othes of freedoms or inflicting harm upon me and that's what liberals do.
Only Lydecker, eir, gordon et. al have tried to turn this into a "Sandy hates everybody" argument. I never said I hated a single person because of their religion, their race, their homeland or even their culture. I hate liberals because of their destructive, immoral, and anti-freedom beliefs. Liberals come in all colors, sizes and varities. I'm sorry to disappoint Lydecker etc but you're not going to corner me into a box and label me "hater" of all peoples because I have clearly stated my position and defined those to whom I refer.
And if there's any doubt about how I feel about this moron advocating contracting marriage out to toddlers, he's a damn liberal! He can rot in Hell!- eir574, on 06/26/2008, -0/+6"Only Lydecker, eir, gordon et. al have tried to turn this into a "Sandy hates everybody" argument. "
I never said you hate everybody. I said you hate liberals and wish for their deaths. That's entirely accurate. Hating people is one thing, but wishing them harm is entirely different. That's what makes you a miserable excuse for a human being.
And, yes, you can think "too highly" of someone without thinking highly of them in the first place. I'm not sure where you learned your grammar. If you don't like that pharse, I also could have said I overestimated your decency as a human being, meaning that I thought you had relatively little decency, but it turned out that you have even less than I'd thought. - Cate320, on 06/26/2008, -0/+7You obviously missed the point, which isn't surprising considering the huge amount of faulty logic in most of your posts.
I was pointing out that it was "liberals" that worked towards equal rights for women, minorities, etc throughout the ages. Without the very people you claim to hate, you would be right where those Saudi women are today (assuming you're a woman; your name is sexually ambiguous).
Just because you are "comfortable" with how things are today, doesn't make liberals bad. I'm sure people had the same attitudes as you when they were discussing giving women the right to vote, and equal rights for minorities. And the vast majority of people today would consider those "conservatives" wrong, now wouldn't they? Things change and it isn't always a bad thing.
- eir574, on 06/26/2008, -0/+6"Only Lydecker, eir, gordon et. al have tried to turn this into a "Sandy hates everybody" argument. "
- lydecker, on 06/25/2008, -2/+9Way to be wrong, Sandy.
- OwlCreek, on 06/25/2008, -2/+0Actually, they are.
- Sandy1000, on 06/25/2008, -11/+2You know, liberals would definitely disagree with you. After all, they say that "all cultures are equal" and that one is not better than another. In fact, in America, multicultarism demands that you accept all customs, cultures and beliefs as valid and equal. The libs would accuse you of being intolerant, xenophobic and judgemental, so it goes against political correctness to suggest that this cultural belief is somehow "invalid" or "wrong."
- kingygk, on 06/25/2008, -0/+4This is sick!!
- OwlCreek, on 06/25/2008, -1/+4You know that your religion is in trouble when your leading prophet was a pedophile.
- DuggDowner, on 06/26/2008, -2/+1All religions are stupid, but every once in a while they get something right.
- curtisag, on 06/26/2008, -1/+3A broken clock is right 2 times a day. That's not saying much imo.
- regression, on 06/26/2008, -0/+1inb4 pedobear ascii
- Equinox2012, on 06/26/2008, -1/+3Now we see ladies and gentleman why they no longer make the Sandy1000 pleasure models. The piss and vinegar used to fuel the batteries leaks into the pleasantry software leaving its personalty no more desirable than a yeast infected, yammering, self important, lap dancer on meth.
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -2/+1That's just an arbitrary attack for the purpose of plain old hating. What prompted your attack? Do you have an argument of your own to make here?
Thank you for demonstating to the entire community here my point about liberals. You have no valid argument. You offered no points for debate or consideration, no insight, you showed no thought, reason or logic only insults and oddly placed attacks.- lydecker, on 06/26/2008, -0/+5"Thank you for demonstating to the entire community here my point about liberals. You have no valid argument. You offered no points for debate or consideration, no insight, you showed no thought, reason or logic only insults and oddly placed attacks."
Wow, I didn't know Sandy was a liberal.
I figure that since you actually believe the stuff you post, that the majority of liberals have proven you wrong about liberals. There are plenty of valid arguments, points for debate and consideration, insight, thought, reason, logic, and not only insults (as you enjoy calling people child molesters) or oddly placed attacks. - Equinox2012, on 06/26/2008, -0/+1I hate cause I love. My illogical loathing of you is no deeper than yours for liberals.
- lydecker, on 06/26/2008, -0/+5"Thank you for demonstating to the entire community here my point about liberals. You have no valid argument. You offered no points for debate or consideration, no insight, you showed no thought, reason or logic only insults and oddly placed attacks."
- Sandy1000, on 06/26/2008, -2/+1That's just an arbitrary attack for the purpose of plain old hating. What prompted your attack? Do you have an argument of your own to make here?
- anbudom, on 06/26/2008, -0/+1Surely, this is taking it to the extreme.
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is