Call for questions
Submit and vote up questions you'd like to see answered by Kevin & Jay at the next Digg Townhall on 11/18.
Russia may arm Baltic fleet with nuclear warheads
ynetnews.com — New Russian threat comes in response to war in Caucasus, US-Poland deal for missile defense shield in Europe. According to Sunday Times, nuclear warheads could be supplied to submarines, cruisers and fighter bombers of Russia's Baltic fleet based between Poland and Lithuania
2bsbc- 122 diggs
- digg it
- GovernmentSp00k, on 08/17/2008, -1/+26Looks like the "freedom fighting" liberation and democracy-loving Neoconservatives might have another war on their hands. Certainly not what they planned right? or strategized for years to manifest. Nothing PNAC would ever want anything to do with. And of course, there's no AIPAC involvement whatsoever we all know they would never bribe the US government for their personal self-serving agenda that puts American citizens at great risk. I'm sure such caring folks took every possible step to avoid it at all costs and risk endangering100s of 1000s of countless innocent civilians and human life..given they have demonstrated to be so caring towards fellow human beings on this planet. Their mission is to help! They are on a "peacekeeping mission" to "promote freedom and democracy!" How could anyone argue with that? And they had no part whatsoever in 'making conflict happen' given they are such strong believers of individual rights and keeping out of other countries affairs and business. Why would they bother involving themselves and putting America at risk for another war right? It's not like there's any money in those things anymore..
- roosevans, on 08/17/2008, -0/+17I don't think Russia will nuke Poland but if Poland attempts to set up that US backed "missile shield" system Russia will take it out with conventional weapons, for it's own security.
- rexblade, on 08/17/2008, -1/+19Isn't it kinda strange how the MSM will act like this is going to return us to the "cold war" and it's all Russias fault of course. Yet our missiles and bases literally surrounding Russia is perfectly acceptable. Were the only ones to ever use an atomic weapon and that somehow makes us the designator as to who can own them? Where they can put them? Meanwhile our placements are above all scrutiny. I think many countries in the world don't trust us anymore and rightly so.
- Erich100, on 08/17/2008, -1/+17I can't believe the gall of Russia protecting itself from the ever encroaching empire. They're talking about putting nukes on their subs and cruisers. It's a good thing the US hasn't done anything like that. I'm sure the US doesn't have a sub or anything else anywhere with nukes on it.
The bottom line of all of this is, Putin stopped the raping of Russia by the central bankers, making them play by rules that he established rather than allowing them to create the rules for their own gain. Unlike our own Fed. Putin also routed the Israel firsters out of positions of influence within Russia. Russian nationalism is standing in the way of the globalists agenda, the biggest crime of all. - Fangsinmybeard, on 08/18/2008, -0/+16Now this is serious! Make way for instant extinction instead of dying a long, drawn out, miserable death.
- MarkEarhart, on 08/18/2008, -0/+8Nuclear war? With Russia? Do the fools in Washington and the shadow government really think they are immune to this threat? I suppose they are so insane that they do.
- nick1971, on 08/20/2008, -0/+3One more step along the path of German history. Further steps in the name of securing our interest against potential enemies of the state. Which war do you think will be started first? That against Russia or that against Iran.
- sicntired, on 08/23/2008, -0/+1America almost incinerated the whole planet because of a few missles on Cuba.Now you place 200 nukes in Poland and are surprised when Russia reacts.Kennedy called the placing of the missles in Cuba an act of war.
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is