9 Comments
- inactive, on 08/05/2008, -0/+8Why did Bush choose to lie and say it was anthrax from Iraq?
http://vdare.com/roberts/080804_tyranny.htm
I think we know why. - principle, on 08/05/2008, -0/+5Bush Administration wants to close this case regardless of evidence to the contrary. Then they will simply insist that the case is closed, with yet another success in the War on Terror.
- Shiftgood, on 08/05/2008, -0/+5They are also calling him a Christian die hard.
But the bible says, if you kill yourself you go to hell, no ifs ands or buts.
I smell fish. - JoeParanoid, on 08/05/2008, -0/+4Curiouser and Curiouser. And the FBI is so ready to close its books. Sounds like another patsy to me.
- alittlebrookie, on 08/05/2008, -1/+59/11 was an inside job. And the anthrax attack was a way to silence the media and push through the PATRIOT act. Scot McClellan admitted that the White House staff was on Cipro a week before the Anthrax attacks occurred.
Motive ? Ivins didn't have one. - nontoxyc, on 08/07/2008, -0/+2Bush is a traitor.
- jeffbw, on 08/06/2008, -1/+2"This is obviously a problem for the "For Profit Media""
Dream on; they'll just blithely go on wondering if Obama is too skinny to be President. But if the FBI is supposed to release its "evidence" on Wednesday, and they don't have anything better than they've come up with so far, we may well be through the looking glass. - lollypopguild, on 08/05/2008, -0/+1This is obviously a problem for the "For Profit Media"
- rowjimmy, on 08/05/2008, -1/+1umm that didn't really stop ~2000 years of killing in the name of.


What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved