What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
407 Comments
- coltrane68, on 10/10/2007, -16/+192Douse him with meat broth and lock him in a cage with his vile dogs.
- fyngyrz, on 10/10/2007, -1/+68Look, I'm a cat lover; and I find this appalling. But don't blame the dogs. They're no more vile than the cats are (if you've ever seen what a cat does to a mouse, you'll know just how effective a carnivore a cat is.) Blame the owner; he's entirely at fault for conditioning these dogs to eat cats. Unfortunately, the dogs will probably have to be put down now.
Having said that, ok, let's get the meat broth. - jwdarkstar, on 10/10/2007, -5/+70Yeah, but break his arms and legs first.
- JAVandiver, on 10/10/2007, -2/+56Cut him too, so they can smell blood.
- 3lijah, on 10/10/2007, -23/+74I'm in your pit bulls..
- vileS, on 10/23/2007, -9/+55IM IN UR PITBULLZ
BEIN DIGESTED - dagnabbit, on 10/10/2007, -6/+50Sick *****.
- hatepirate, on 10/10/2007, -4/+47But don't most people who feed live animals to their pets do so because that's the only way their pets will eat (like snakes in regards to mice)? I mean, the existence of dog food makes it completely unnecessary to take live animals and feed them to your dog. There's a huge difference between feeding live animals to your pet because that's the only way they'll eat and feeding live animals to your pet for no reason other than you enjoy seeing the prey being eaten.
- SilentJay74, on 10/10/2007, -3/+43What a douche bag.
- asdfblah, on 10/10/2007, -3/+42Here's the mother *****: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us ...
- deleo, on 10/10/2007, -3/+41I hope he gets raped in prison
- spasticjedi, on 10/10/2007, -1/+37People ask me all the time why I don't let my cats outside. Stories like this are exactly the reason. I would go ***** if someone knowingly hurt my cats. I would be in jail right next to the animal abusing ***** who would dare to lay a hand on them. I hear ***** all the time about people shooting cats, running them over, letting their dogs attack them. Does this somehow go way, way back to the whole "witches familiar" bit from the 1700s? Seriously, I can't understand why people do things like this.
- nutzngum, on 10/10/2007, -4/+40i recently adopted two kittens and the *thought* of something like that being done to them simultaneously brings tears to my eyes and a desire to unleash an unholy amount of violence on his ass.
He *injures* the cats/kittens first? I'm almost speachless - just when you think you've seen the lowest form of inhumanity, some vile piece of trash comes along and does something like this. - Frei, on 10/10/2007, -3/+37Please don't overlook "Hilmo would capture and injure neighborhood cats for this purpose."
So he hunted cats to "feed" to an abused starving dog. He's a sick *****. - whatthefu, on 10/10/2007, -3/+34Neighborhood cats and kittens? That's ***** terrible.
- krabat, on 10/10/2007, -3/+31I lose all rationality when dealing with psychotic ***** like this that do things to animals. I guess that's why I'm not in law enforcement.
- theworldisflat, on 10/10/2007, -7/+30A feline is higher on the evolutionary ladder than say a mouse, worm or goldfish. They are also not a normal food source for a canine, and pointless to use them as feed.
- TheRemoteViewer, on 10/10/2007, -1/+23My message to Tye: "Have fun being used as a party favor by larger inmates you sick *****."
- yfguitarist, on 10/10/2007, -0/+22"Mood: Guilty"
- SpectralSounds, on 10/10/2007, -1/+21Keep us updated on everything else you digg, because the public needs to know.
- WaterDragon, on 10/10/2007, -4/+23On behalf of cat lovers everywhere....can we get his address?
- cygnus2112, on 10/10/2007, -3/+21They should feed him to a wood chipper.
- Adgeman, on 10/10/2007, -7/+25Hopefully he will die in an exceptionally painful circumstances. What makes someone such vile person?
- TheRemoteViewer, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17Purposely capturing and injuring someone's pet to get off on watching your vicious dog kill it is in no way morally equivalent to eating a cheeseburger.
- FortyCaliber, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16No.
Most serial killers test their abilities on animals before moving to people. This guy is one in the same. I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up feeding a neighborhood child to a dog. - Uhhh, on 10/10/2007, -10/+25Georgia. Go figure...
- stronglikedan, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17"Mood: Guilty". That's awesome. That dude looks like such a pussy.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -22/+37god damn im sick of these people he should get murder charges not agravated cruelty to animals
- TheDreadDiggerD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14I can sympathize with you. I love dogs but don't own any due to housing and financial reasons. People that train dogs to be vicious for the sake of their own devices makes me sick. Screw putting him in a cage with the dogs. Put the bastard in a cage with me!
- theworldisflat, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14#1 is true, but #2 is not. You cannot use deadly force on someone for stealing your cat. Even brandishing and threatening the person will land you in jail very quickly. Most state laws are very similar -- you may only draw your weapon if the immediate threat of bodily harm to yourself or those around you, who are legally entitled to be in the place where the altercation occurred (ie: you can't rob a store, shoot someone who was going to shoot you and then claim self defense). The definition of bodily harm varies, in most states it must be a battery (closed fist assault) or higher (weapon, or using an animal such as a pitt bull).
As much as I wish I could "sort things out" with people using my sidearm, I cannot. If you actually took a CWP class, you would know this. - TheRemoteViewer, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14Yeah, the dogs didn't do anything, they were just misfortunate enough to have an owner that trained them to be vicious.
- Rikkochet, on 10/10/2007, -4/+16No - I'll jump in here. I worked in a pet store for 7 years to pay my way through school and had a good glimpse of the reptile crowd.
In the entire world, there are maybe 20 people who feed live rodents to their snakes because it's necessary. Sometimes a wild-caught reptile simply will not take thawed or freshly-killed (or even stunned) prey. They just don't get it, and need to kill their own prey and eat it. That's just the way it is.
The rest can either be trained to take dead food, or will willingly do so without coaching or coaxing. Most pet stores stock frozen mice and rats (at various stages of development) in their freezers and they are cheaper than live.
You know how many of my customers actually bought the frozen stuff, or pre-killed/stunned them at home before feeding? A handful, plus the teenagers whose parents had a strong involvement.
The rest bought live mice and rats. Know why? Because seeing a snake kill something is TOTALLY AWESOME! These are the same degenerates that start sentences with the word "*****'" and try to do the goth thing but they're too fat to really pull it off.
There are many responsible herpetoculturists out there that not only keep exotic pets and enjoy them, but also contribute to captive breeding and husbandry research that you simply don't see in labs.
There are many, many more that are just stupid ***** that want to see things die. They're always male and always single (or don't come in with the same girl for very long).
It's pathetic and the argument that feeding live creatures to our pets is "necessary" is a weak argument born of either ignorance/inexperience, or deception to try and make their practices acceptable in the eyes of the public. After 7 years in the trade I still have pets, but when enough people ruin it for the rest of us and there is finally a complete ban on owning all pets, I'll be the first one applauding. (PETA are ***** and I still eat meat - this isn't about animal "rights", it's about animal welfare) - Roger, on 10/10/2007, -3/+14Are you high right now?
- WaterDragon, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11That is unlikely, because there are still kittens.
- krabat, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10The morality of all that is something to debate, but the point is he was taking other peoples' pet cats off the streets and breaking their legs to feed to his dog. He wasn't going and buying cats for the purpose.
- theNazz, on 10/10/2007, -6/+16Flush this piece of human ***** down the toilet.
- WaterDragon, on 10/10/2007, -7/+17Just as I thought...we who appreciate cats should not be messed with.
How about a less violent response:
Gently lower him, unharmed, into a tank of hungry sharks. Small sharks are best, since they take smaller bites.
I ask myself...are we becoming like the kitties we love so much?
What would a cat do?
How about just scratching his eyes out, and then letting him live out his life without eyes?
I keed, I keed! (that makes it OK) - alexanEmpire, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Also, can we get a list of his fears?
- Walkboss, on 10/10/2007, -4/+13God, I hate sweeping generalizations.
- pbaehr, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9In New York (Nassau County) you're allowed to use deadly physical force to protect your property, not just against the threat of bodily harm. Kittens are property.
- ToTiredToCare, on 10/10/2007, -5/+14I say feed him to his pit bulls, Sin City/Marv style...
- MWeather, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9"But don't most people who feed live animals to their pets do so because that's the only way their pets will eat (like snakes in regards to mice)?"
No. They'll eat dead mice too. And Oscars will eat normal fish food. It's just not as much fun as feeding them live goldfish. - usrlocalbin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9Well that would be a lot better than what our current law enforcement does.
They go crazy when dealing with normal people. Tasering, beating, etc.
I would love to hear about cops going completely ***** ape ***** on people like this though.
"Todays headline: Cops beat man to a pulp, taser his bloody body, and spray his wounds with pepper spray after finding out that he abuses and kills innocent kittehs" - crackedplastic, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9I agree with you (I once had a pet frog many years ago) - however, the circumstances on how the cats were obtained (and what was done to them) prior to the feeding is the objectionable part.
- DiamondIce, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8So you send your kids out into a farmyard and tell them to chow down on a live cow? No, you don't, the cow is killed first in a very painless manner. This guy fed the cats ALIVE to the dogs. Not only that but these were kittens, that he wounded no less, there was no way they could defend them selves. It's barbaric, plain and simple. Not only that, this guy didn't do it to keep his dogs alive (if he wanted to feed his dogs meat instead of kibble he could have got scraps from the butchers shop), he did it for his own twisted pleasure.
- ncc74656m, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8I WOULD kill to protect my cats. These dickless SOBs who feel some urge to hurt innocent animals to make themselves feel all tough.
The Michael Vicks of the world really need to be violently removed from the planet. - exomni, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10TO Akaji: EXACTLY. We CONDITION AND BREED dogs to eat what we want them to eat. Conditioning and breeding a Dog over years and generations of mixing to be civil and subservient to us, and then making them eat kittens is a sick and immoral crime against the dog.
- alexanEmpire, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8There's no ***** point in feeding a dog (or any other animal) kittens, you ***** Leonardo da Vinci.
There is already made food for dogs...such as packaged dog food. Not to mention, some of those cats and kittens were other peoples pets. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't taking something that doesn't belong to you called...stealing? How would you like it if someone stole something you love, only to use it food for something else? - somnambualist, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Like most things in the criminal law, it is about intent. You aren't feeding the crickets to your scorpion for your own enjoyment. Although, I'll admit watching my Python eat a rat is a pretty impressive sight, I don't do it for recreation. Pythons and scorpions can only eat live prey, as opposed to scavengers like dogs. The only reason this guy did it was because he got his jollys from it. You feeding crickets to a scorpion doesn't indicate that you are a danger to society, this guy is about two minutes from becoming a serial rapist and killer.
- Otto, on 10/10/2007, -3/+11Renork: So, by your logic, there's no difference between eating a cow and eating another human being. They're both mammals, after all.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 410 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is