digg

Join DiggAbout

Digg Townhall Tonight!
Tune into the live Digg townhall tonight at 5:00pm PST/8:00pm EST.

Keep up to date on Anon's Scientology targets and results.

remisser.com — .

show profanity settings
expand all
  • ch0240, on 01/25/2008, -22/+196We are Anonymous.

    We are Legion.

    We do not forgive.

    WE DO NOT FORGET.

    Expect us.
    • BananaGrabber, on 01/25/2008, -5/+119You're a 21 year-old male from Hamburg. Not very anonymous.
      • capiCrimm, on 01/25/2008, -0/+32Anonymous must have hacked his digg account.
      • mrboratsagdiev, on 01/25/2008, -3/+11Funny enough, anyone could put any old name and city in there.
        • Alucard90, on 01/25/2008, -2/+12But the problem is that he is ch0240, not Anonymous.
    • starscream45, on 01/25/2008, -3/+76They are Anonymous.
      They are Legion.
      They do not forgive.
      THEY DO NOT FORGET
      Expect them, but don't expect any hacking from me, I don't know how to do jack!
      (except digg things up)
      • Sidzilla, on 01/25/2008, -2/+10You have made my entire friggin' day!!!!
      • Audacitor, on 01/25/2008, -1/+8Open terminal.app, type "ping scientology.org". A small contribution, but a contribution nonetheless.
        • earthforce1, on 01/25/2008, -0/+11If you have linux, running sudo ping -f scientology.org will hammer them (Ping flood, sent as fast as your computer can issue them, not once per second) MUCH, MUCH nastier.


          • vahnx, on 02/11/2008, -0/+1How can I ping my networked desktop running XP so it crashes? Is it possible? I tried sudo ping -f 192.168.1.136 and it looks like it's pining, but then I use my desktop and the internet and everything works fine. I am behind a router and I disabled the firewall.
      • ifknot, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1sudo ping -f -q 68.178.153.227

        is better, by-pass ddos filter go straight to CoS url ping with flood -f switch & no screen output switch -q
    • Garay002, on 01/25/2008, -18/+4Poser.
    • ooby, on 01/25/2008, -21/+2buried as spam
      • mcgarry83, on 01/25/2008, -2/+768.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
    • evilelf2407, on 01/25/2008, -15/+23god damnit these comments are ***** lame. when is this going to be over?
      • arcooke, on 01/25/2008, -10/+16I've about ***** had it with everyone saying "lulz". That's the most annoying word I've ever heard/read.

        Pretty much anyone who says anything that comes from 4chan/cheezeburger needs to be punched.
        • scunner, on 01/25/2008, -3/+4i fully agree to this
          • rompom7, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Ok thats fine. Just don't go reading the comments then. Don't bother digging the articles if you want this to end.

            Anon are up against something bigger than your remarks. So leave them somewhere else.
        • Microdot, on 01/25/2008, -2/+21i cant haz lulz?
        • smacksaw, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4I think you're missing the point here buddy. Let me explain something to you. Anonymous hates LULZ. Anonymous hates seeing the same crap over and over again, yet posts it until it's not funny. That's when it gets funny, because you're behind.

          Anonymous hates furfags. Yet anonymous posts fur ***** in /b/ all the time. If Anonymous can deal with furfags, "LULZ" ain't nothin' but a thang, chicken wing.

          See how I did that fagtastic "thang" quote? I hate it. That's exactly it. You must hate it enough to love it or you are the object of hate and ridicule.

          You can't complain to Anon or troll Anon because Anon already hated it and trolled it before you even got the ***** message. Anon's suffering predates yours and it's at Anon's own hands.
          • barrygoldwater, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2mmm yeah, sounding more and more like scientology. ambivalence is bliss;.
      • wirah, on 01/25/2008, -4/+7When Scientology is crushed at the hands of Anonymous
      • Archeologist, on 01/25/2008, -3/+8I respect anon, but these wannabes on digg are lulz killers.
      • mcgarry83, on 01/25/2008, -1/+768.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
        gogogo
      • catbeller, on 01/25/2008, -3/+6So your ability to war against evil, or even to read about it, is limited to about, what, 24 hours? Americans -- proud possessors of the shortest collective attention span in human history. LOOK! Over there -- it's Britney!
      • Tarkaan, on 01/25/2008, -2/+1Oh, buddy... I'm just going to give you my personal experience. When anon decides to do something, you can help or get the hell out of the way. Those are really your only two options.
        I'm doing my part!
    • phickler, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3They are but you aren't.
      • mcgarry83, on 01/25/2008, -1/+368.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
    • stolenisotope1, on 01/25/2008, -0/+9HAI! CAN I JOIN?
      • mcgarry83, on 01/25/2008, -1/+1068.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
        68.178.153.227
      • mcgarry83, on 01/25/2008, -0/+868.178.153.227 (Anon found the direct IP to www.scientology.org, not protected by Prolexic
      • MarkusGarvey, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1198.95.10.136
        65.255.206.18
      • ifknot, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1linux? unix? os x? then play your part with ping flood
        sudo ping -f -q 68.178.153.227
    • RandomGorilla, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4I normally don't care about any of these raids the chans try to pull off. However, this one's special. I'm imagining that the Scientologists are freaking out and flailing like a retard struck by lightning because the group can't directly sue anyone yet. This warms my jaded heart and will probably be the funniest thing to watch this week.

      Go Anons!
      • smacksaw, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2No, they WON'T sue. They can, but it's what Anon wants. Anon is begging to be sued to have the opportunity to speak in court and to expose Co$ on the record. They can't have a secret if Anon puts everything into evidence. "Oh, Anon stole our secret files."

        Entered into evidence?

        Bam - no more secret.
    • Mahluc, on 01/26/2008, -0/+1The Anon attack is great but people need to hear more stories like this http://digg.com/tech_news/Church_of_scientology. Those ignorant of what Scientology is have to know whats going on!
  • Choobie, on 01/25/2008, -3/+63I can feel the internets cringing at the feel of Anon running through it with such fury.
  • Oea420, on 01/25/2008, -4/+67The internets is mad!

    RUH ROH

  • Ubernero, on 01/25/2008, -7/+45For epic justice!
  • sebrOck, on 01/25/2008, -5/+39fire ze lazers!1
  • redcodenl, on 01/25/2008, -2/+51Aww you crazy rebels :)

    Seems like its going pretty well though.
    • mranderson86, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3Anyone thought that the Church Of Scientology is doing this to easily spread their propanda?????????????????
  • epicphail, on 01/25/2008, -18/+6We are legion.
  • Devdude30, on 01/25/2008, -8/+39For every one that falls ten will take their place.
  • j34nn07, on 01/25/2008, -10/+4After May first 2007 : January 24 07
  • mghwom1, on 01/25/2008, -16/+43The official Scientology site (www.scientology.org) is DOWN!
    • silentpl, on 01/25/2008, -5/+8...NOT
    • madpie, on 01/25/2008, -3/+11that's funny, it works fine for me.
    • whatsgoodike, on 01/25/2008, -3/+4not for me...
    • MrPig, on 01/25/2008, -16/+2No it's not retard. It's protected.
      • Drax0n, on 01/25/2008, -3/+15ROFL you can't "protect" a website from ddos attacks. The very nature of the flood gets all the "good" requests mixed in with the bad requests. Numbnuts.
        By the way I have screen shots from their ISP saying the site is unavailable proxima
        There is no way to tell the bad traffic from the good traffic unless you slowly filter the traffac at which point you can setup a new proxy lisat and hit them from a whole new set of IPs. NOTE Filtering out the bad IPs is not an easy or fast process... and yes it has been up and down for over an hour now. I have screen shots.
      • Drax0n, on 01/25/2008, -1/+3Protected.. LOL

        http://img230.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lulzcd8.j ...

        Looks down to me.. well at least intermitent.. Protected? Ha thanks for the laugh Tom.. Zip zappidy pow!
    • tyiscool06, on 01/25/2008, -3/+4I'm still able to access it...
    • mghwom1, on 01/25/2008, -1/+3It was down two minutes ago...and down for a good 15 minutes.
    • SteveIsTheDude, on 01/25/2008, -1/+8Wish your post was true, pulls up fine for me, has a picture of L. Ron looking just like Lenny from "Happy Days", except with a very gay, very 1960's, Ascott that only Fred from Scooby Doo could pull off.
      • ADM1NX, on 01/25/2008, -2/+0Lenny was on Laverne and Shirley, not Happy Days.
        • smacksaw, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4BZZT

          Wrong!

          Laverne & Shriley were a spinoff of Happy Days. That's where the characters came first.

          It's like saying Joanie and Chachi were on Joanie and Chachi, not Happy Days.

          You kids these days. Get the hell off of my lawn and internets!
    • coredump0x01, on 01/25/2008, -0/+8http://www.whatisscientology.org/ has been completely non-responsive for over an hour.
    • MrMacMan, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4Yes it's called intermittent connection.
    • milliamp, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3scientology.org/com currently says:

      Site Temporarily Unavailable.
      Sorry, the site you requested is currently unavailable. It will be available as soon as possible. Please try again later.
      Generated Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:19:27 GMT by Prolexic.com (SI1.PHX1/4.0)

      Prolexic seems to be some anti-DDos solution.
    • Drax0n, on 01/25/2008, -0/+5Yes it is down.
      http://img230.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lulzcd8.j ...
      Check ther screen shot.. I love how thier isp claims they can stop DDOS attacks
    • mghwom1, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2Down again.
    • SolidSnake24, on 03/28/2008, -0/+1***** Yeah!
    • buddyw, on 01/25/2008, -0/+14The DDOS attack is actually Digg users checking to see if the site is up. I think Schroedinger was on to something.
  • redrighthand, on 01/25/2008, -2/+12all down
  • wastedfish, on 01/25/2008, -28/+7DIGG: Anon Propaganda Website Extrodinaire

    I love these posts, I think they are hilarious. But lets face it, somewhere in the depths of 4chan IRC servers there are hundreds of anons mass digging these stories.
  • SevenTwo, on 01/25/2008, -5/+4Stop the Xenugears at once!
  • acex23, on 01/25/2008, -10/+2what about www.scientology.com?
  • itwasstinky, on 01/25/2008, -3/+12internet is serious business
  • elfuego, on 01/25/2008, -1/+122I'm not knocking ANON, or what they're doing... but there's gotta be more than DDoS if they actually plan to take these people down. Leaking documents is a good start... let's see them step it up. Results of a DDoS attack aren't too major beyond the site being inaccessible.
    • Lyph5, on 01/25/2008, -5/+36Bandwidth costs. The DDoS is mostly to distract SciFags from the fact that we're in their servers haxin their dox.
      • capiCrimm, on 01/25/2008, -7/+21not to rain on your parade, but if your DDoSing a site that makes it pretty hard to hack their servers. Seeing as you can't get a connection and all...
        • Lyph5, on 01/25/2008, -2/+19They host secret ***** on their public website, damn, you figured it out.
          Go take CompSci III.
          • capiCrimm, on 01/25/2008, -1/+1well anon is flooding any IP touched by Scientology. Unless your somehow in the same room your going to need one of those servers ips to access their internal network. I wasn't proposing secret ***** was on their public webserver. (although some of the forms might be in a protected folder or ftp folder)
          • azbmr, on 01/25/2008, -1/+1No, they don't do ANYTHING high-tech. There really don't keep anything of value on any public server. Anything "hacked" off a server that ANON can access remotely, is a fake. Seriously, they just moved from tapes to CDs this year.
      • azbmr, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2Also doesn't help that they don't keep anything of merit on public servers. In fact, they don't keep much digital at all, usually things are kept in physical safes, so not a lot ANON can do there.
        • RobotBuddha, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4Nothing stopping them from just breaking into one of the larger centers. Except scientologists being insane, and willing to kill people for pretty minor slights. But I imagine there's a lot of teens involved in this, with the usual assumptions of immortality and invincibility that come with that age. So, who knows, they might actually dig something up and scan it.
        • monospaced, on 01/25/2008, -1/+3I believe they did find quite a lot of pretty sensitive information there, buddy.
    • asspants, on 01/25/2008, -1/+17if you investigate a little more you'll find black faxes and stupid phone calls are annoying too, there's more than just ddos going on.
      • Lyph5, on 01/25/2008, -2/+7Not to mention people protesting the 'Churches' IRL. Masses of Anon.
        Hell, Furfags (May they Yiff in hell) and Anon have put aside their differences to join forces for this.
        • MewtwoReturns, on 01/25/2008, -4/+1If you'd REALLY put aside your differences with furries, you wouldn't call them furfags anymore, and you wouldn't tell them to yiff in hell.
        • Schneckehaus, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4Furfags will always be furfags, not even Anon can fix that.
    • staxofmax, on 01/25/2008, -0/+19These attacks could gain additional publicity for Anon. So besides the bandwidth cost and annoyance factor for Scientology, these DDoS attacks also serve to recruit additional members to join the attack.
    • whoamarcos, on 01/25/2008, -0/+8I'm hoping to see some financial transfers from scientology to psychological research groups.
    • MrMacMan, on 01/25/2008, -0/+5If you want to know what else you can do lots of ideas here:
      partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology
    • jrwr, on 01/25/2008, -0/+7ill host them, hell ive done it before, look at mediadefender-defenders.com
    • catbeller, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2Yup. Even ten years ago, we knew Scientology used leased lines and encrypted communications for its down and dirty real business. All the Anon is doing is messing with the servers that feed web pages to the average internet user. Separate systems.
  • TheVirus, on 01/25/2008, -6/+42United as 1. Divided by 0.
  • wastedfish, on 01/25/2008, -20/+367 diggs to 150 in 10 seconds.

    In the depths of IRC 4chan servers these guys are mass digging this ***** to the front page over and over.
    dugg for the lulz tho
    • itwasstinky, on 01/25/2008, -0/+7annon is everywhere
    • capiCrimm, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4bad move, there. So when Anonymous kills you can I have your car?
  • revslowmo, on 01/25/2008, -5/+10The Scientology 0 anon 1
    • Drax0n, on 01/25/2008, -0/+20Its actually Scientology 0 Anon 3 at the moment... assuming you count the docs and other attacks
  • cuntmate99, on 01/25/2008, -11/+6god damn that's so cool
    • cuntmate99, on 01/25/2008, -8/+2why am i getting dugg down? i wasn't be sarcastic!
      • Joshuarr, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1I can't speak for everyone else, but I dugg you down because your handle is *****. Oh, and also for the stupid comment.
      • smacksaw, on 01/25/2008, -1/+2LURK MOAR NEWFAG
  • Foamator, on 01/25/2008, -2/+29http://remisser.com/targets.html
    For great justice.
  • nukepuppy, on 01/25/2008, -2/+11This just in! you need to refresh every 10 seconds for it to show the results properly
  • whoamarcos, on 01/25/2008, -2/+89The entire internet coming together to bring down a cult.

    Amazing
    • Versh, on 01/25/2008, -1/+10Who would have thought significant events in history could happen on the Internet?
      • whoamarcos, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Al Gore, thats why he invented it.
    • DNABeast, on 01/25/2008, -3/+3That's like saying an entire freeway full of people helped a crash crash victim by rubber-necking.
    • jakk, on 01/25/2008, -0/+6Inspiring, isn't it?
      Sort of like how the media mobilized to take down Nixon, now the Internet is using regular people to bring down something even creepier.
      Amazing.
      • Waterrat, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2 Even if this cult were outlawed,they would go underground and continue...
    • grubwort, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4The entire internet coming together to bring down a cult'S WEBSITE

      fixd
  • nagual678, on 01/25/2008, -1/+46IN 2008 RAID WAS BEGINNING
    • salvadorwii, on 01/25/2008, -0/+14what happen
      somebody set up us the ddos
    • gmiley, on 01/25/2008, -1/+2What happen?
    • rz8472, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Launch all Xenu for great justice?
    • smacksaw, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Mother ***** WHY is this not on YouTube yet? Anon has multitasking operating systems for ddos and crapass movie maker.
  • ElementEVE, on 01/25/2008, -2/+19does anyone have a mirror?
    the site is down EPIC LOLz
  • somespecial, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4"covert" and Project, sounds so CIA
  • mikesbaker, on 01/25/2008, -28/+7we need another website for this *****???? I ask because it seems to be digg.com's sole purpose these days. also these dos attacks will not stop scientology. when will you guys realize that action occurs outside of the virtual world. now if you really want to start controversy and make a big point that will be paid attention to by other people than the denizens of the net you should do some thing like firebomb one of their centers. of course all of you aren't into taking real action so I think that the scientologists have nothing to worry about. also how long is this going to be kept up? a year tops? (and thats being very unrealistic) so when you guys have your fun and get a few stupid kids (following someone else's lead) in big trouble for this ***** you will all move on to a new way to waste your time. there will always be cults and nothing you do can stop it. so please go to the chans if you want to keep this ***** up and quit clogging digg with this idiocy.
    • rossmills, on 01/25/2008, -3/+1Violence is not the answer, especially in this case. They will get sympathy if people get violent.
      • Sidzilla, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1I know, we quit going to Tom Cruise movies!!! Oh, wait...
      • mikesbaker, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1i understand that - you completely missed my point - this is not the answer either education is not childish attacks on websites that cannot be sustained indefinitely - seriously in all this anon ***** everyone seems to think that having a dos attack will end scientology - it will not - it will do nothing - FACE REALITY
    • Fordi, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2You missed the memo.
      First: the idea isn't to destroy the religion of Scientology, it's to remove the corrupt admins of the Church of Scientology.
      Second: The DDoS is to garner publicity, and shine a light on the Church.
      Third: The release of scientologist documents is to give non-administrative members of the Church access to that which they'd otherwise have to shell out their life savings for.
      Fourth: The whole plan is to give form the frustrations of Scientologists with their own administration. From there, they will remove or disempower the administration, thus ending the unethical and often criminal tactics of the Church of Scientology.
  • starscream45, on 01/25/2008, -1/+10Suck it Co$!
  • CHiLL, on 01/25/2008, -1/+98I, for one, welcome our new anonymous overlords.
  • camintmier, on 01/25/2008, -21/+5Since when did digg become 4chan's /b/ section?
  • bechard, on 01/25/2008, -0/+18Sweet! Its up and I can now take the personality test!....wait, its down again.

    Anon, you guys rule.
  • SteveIsTheDude, on 01/25/2008, -29/+5OK, their beliefs are stupid... Why are we mad at them, though? Do they preach against hacking or something? Are they against Ron Paul or Net Neutrality? Seriously, why do we (we, as in Digg users) care about them again?
  • woofers07, on 01/25/2008, -5/+84So when can we get Anon to take down the Westboro Baptist Church.
    • itwasstinky, on 01/25/2008, -5/+33not your personal army
      • naldwell, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1the WBC are likely to complain and try to fight back though...
        • CATSCEO, on 01/25/2008, -0/+6WBCtards are too stupid to use a computer.
      • rz8472, on 01/25/2008, -1/+5The WBC isn't converting anyone and dont have widespread support. Scientology has at least 500000 supporters worldwide.
    • SteveIsTheDude, on 01/25/2008, -7/+3Now your talking! These people are terrible, terrible people. I LIKE Will Smith and he joined Scientology so I can say with some assurance that not ALL Scientologists are Assholes. Can't say that about Westboro Baptist, though :)
      • neodorian, on 01/25/2008, -0/+9Well, if you like Will Smith then you ought to be angry that they got to him.

        /fruity little club
      • MaddieCakes, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3Um, proof? I'm pretty sure Will Smith said in an interview that Scientology isn't his thing.
      • Ryan0617, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2Will smith never joined sci, he just stated that he ventured the idea but chose his own god over any other religion.
    • Rikushix, on 01/25/2008, -3/+1While I think CoS is a corrupt, "***** crazy" organization, it doesn't quite hold the malevolence that the Westboro Baptist Church holds, in my mind. I don't know a more evil institution of hate in the entire world than WBC.
      • catbeller, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2Possibly. It depends on who's pointing the gun at you currently. Comparisons are situational.
      • Fordi, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3The WBC are assholes. The CoS is actually criminal.
    • QuickeningYak, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4No need, they'll continue inbreeding themselves to extinction.
  • Doompuppet, on 01/25/2008, -23/+11Oh, another story about scientology? These stories are rare and interesting. Please keep spamming them, as they really are helpful.
  • rossmills, on 01/25/2008, -0/+11If only you could do this in real life. Perhaps fill up the places with people unwilling to actually perform audits.
  • Damien79, on 01/25/2008, -36/+5Rules 1&2 you ***** idiots. /b/. Stop spamming digg with this crap.
    BURIED
    • Mossman85, on 01/25/2008, -2/+12You aren't welcome here, follower of Xenu.
    • Lyph5, on 01/25/2008, -2/+14YOU broke the first two rules. /b/ was not mentioned until you posted.
      Also, rules can be suspended to add moar to the ranks for this epic raid.
    • nukepuppy, on 01/25/2008, -0/+8the rules arent real chimp.
    • MrMacMan, on 01/25/2008, -0/+8For this rain to work, all chans, all tech sites, we need everyone to know of the Co$ BS, we need it to become public knowledge.
    • karenw, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Only newfags mention rules.
  • PISTOLcm, on 01/25/2008, -2/+19Of course, it's 'for the lulz.'

    TAKE DOWN scientology.org!
  • lohphat, on 01/25/2008, -26/+12Is this the taste of things to come? Massive DoS attacks on sites if a a critical mass of people disagree with the message?

    We are doomed as a free society if techno-censorship by thugs (on both sides) if they act in righteous idignation of being the bearers of "the truth".

    Imagine if Intelligent Design proponets would do the to pro-evolution educators.

    This is NOT something to be condoned. Unintended consequences folks.
    • RAEP, on 01/25/2008, -3/+9Some people just don't seem to understand the situation.
      • lohphat, on 01/25/2008, -2/+1I understand the fighting a wrong with a wrong comes to no good end.
        • RAEP, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2What about when there is no way to fight said wrong with a "right"? We aren't doing this because we disagree with their beliefs. We are doing it 2 free da pplz.
    • ohjames, on 01/25/2008, -2/+10You do realize what these attacks are in response to, right? Scientology using malicious lawsuits to censor truthful reports about their organization? There isn't room for reasoned critical debate about Scientology because THEY SUE YOU INTO OBLIVION. If a large segment of society is forcefully acting to destroy such a malevolent and parasitic force, well, aw. Tough luck. I'm cryin' my eyes out over here.
    • galets, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4You are gravely incorrect about free society thing. There will be conflicts always. But only as long as someone else except the government has the gun and is not afraid to use it, we have hope as a free society. I would gladly subscribe under retaliation to any thug who uses the gun of the government to infringe on freedom of the others, be it scientologists or anybody else
    • Kuzaar, on 01/25/2008, -0/+5I think at the core of it anonymous' attacks are just using Scientology's own "fair game" philosophy against them.
    • gllopc, on 01/25/2008, -0/+4You are right in one regard - you should be able to do and say what you want, and only legal discourse should stop you.

      However, you have to realize that a justice system gets mired by political correctness, and that sometimes those people or groups that *are* doing bad, must be handled by other means.

      This is one of those cases. I wish it didn't have to be this way.
  • casspa, on 01/25/2008, -0/+28Anon is really improving the quality of my life
  • waspbr, on 01/25/2008, -1/+17I think this is pretty cool, the internet has finally given people a voice, a chance to react and fight back.

    kudos to ANON
    • dmax801, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2How is this the voice of the people? It's not obvious from what's happening.
  • dkern, on 01/25/2008, -0/+41Actually Anon is a very powerful group who can and will hurt Scientology from spreading via the net. They helped to catch one of the most elusive child predators of all time- I for one do not mind seeing justice served- its the methods we will argue about.
    • Jakerius, on 01/25/2008, -1/+12Only to divert attention away from the hundreds of child predators on 4chan.
    • Crazychipmunk, on 01/25/2008, -0/+5Is there any place to read of all that Anon has done?
  • milliamp, on 01/25/2008, -1/+15Interesting, this site links to a bunch of CoS sites on 1 page: http://remisser.com/targets.html

    Refresh?
    • revslowmo, on 01/25/2008, -3/+3remisser.com is down... doh
      • Waterrat, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Target 3 about their drug "rehab" is still viewable.
  • jcf42005, on 01/25/2008, -8/+1I think Digg should add a Scientolgy section!!!
  • tehawesome531, on 01/25/2008, -16/+7All right, I'm lost. Who's Anon and what is he/they doing?
    • MrMacMan, on 01/25/2008, -1/+5http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/J ...
    • feebie, on 01/25/2008, -2/+5Where have you been??
    • volvinator, on 01/25/2008, -4/+9www.google.com

      JESUS

      CHRIST
      • meschmie, on 01/25/2008, -0/+2WSEWJU?
      • Asberry, on 01/25/2008, -2/+2volvinator, that was hilarious.
        • volvinator, on 01/25/2008, -1/+4Well you know, most people understand that nearly anything, ESPECIALLY current events, can be de-mystified within approx 90 seconds if you simply put, for example "anon scientology" as a search phrase. Yet people are still so terminally lazy, they resort to "wtf is this all about? someone please spoon feed me information for I am 6".

          Thanks for the kudos though!! :-)
      • themoors, on 01/25/2008, -2/+1whats a www.google.com? no need to be so impatient..
    • Lokishot, on 01/25/2008, -2/+1Anon is a pretty cool guy, he aint afraid of anything.
      • turrican, on 01/25/2008, -1/+3YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG
      • MewtwoReturns, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1I believe it's "Anon is a pretty cool guy. eh kills Scientology and doesnt afraid of anything"
    • salvadorwii, on 01/25/2008, -1/+1read the first comment
      We are Anonymous.
      We are Legion.
      We do not forgive.
      WE DO NOT FORGET.
      Expect us.
  • EvansHall, on 01/25/2008, -24/+17Hopefully they take on Christianity, Islam and Judaism next. Or any other ***** monotheistic religion that has thrust us into perpetual millenial war.
    • Manatee44, on 01/25/2008, -1/+6Yeah, good idea. I remember all of their recent attacks on anyone who tried to spread the truth about them. Kudos to you!
    • Fordi, on 01/25/2008, -0/+1Eh. Christianity, Judaism and Islam aren't organized at the top for oppression of their followers and critics.

      Well, maybe Islam in theocratic nations. And the WBC is a bunch of oppressive dicks. Though, the lead members of the Church of Scientology have engaged in everything from unethical legal tactics towards censorship to murder and manslaughter within secular nations. I think that qualifies for a little dismantling.
  • Firebeach, on 01/25/2008, -0/+9Ah, but only if Scientology.org had a visitor ticker!
  • volvinator, on 01/25/2008, -2/+17Absolutely amazing. I really hope Westboro Baptist Church gets hit too, but hey, Scientology is definitely THE most important entity to begin with.

    Incredible... teh internets is being used to collectively fight evil.... WTF?!?
    • catbeller, on 01/25/2008, -1/+2Well, the kids are having fun slapping the servers around, but the REAL way to fight is to just keep spreading the truth... the Xenu story usually hooks your audience. Just tell a friend and have the friend pass it on. Nothing is more powerful than word of mouth. And the spread is amazing. Ten years ago, no one knew but alt.religion.scientology posters, and they had the honor of being harassed by the first spambots on the Usenet. But, quietly, the Xenu story was whispered about in the real world... and Matt and Trey heard, and Steven Colbert heard, and then the real bomb was ready... comedy. Survivors of hundreds of earnest attacks from ex-members that were ruined rather than heard by the public at large, Scientology has crumpled in front of a cartoon.
      BTW: Anon types? Be REALLY sure about your anonymity, because those bastards have billions in cash and they don't forget or forgive, either. Be careful out there.
  • sdigroup, on 01/25/2008, -8/+2Foshizzle
  • mghwom1, on 01/25/2008, -0/+3http://digg.com/comedy/LOLzcats_go_after_Scientolo ...
  • Jareth86, on 01/25/2008, -7/+11So you keep knocking down their websites and spamming them... and this takes down Scientology how? The church and all its followers still exist :(
    Cults can only be destroyed from within. Not by the internet equivalent of crank calling and egging.
    • rumdrunk, on 01/25/2008, -1/+6I think the aim here is to wipe them from the internet, even if its just temporary, If they think they can interfere with YouTube and USENET then they can expect a bit of disruption in return
    • salvadorwii, on 01/25/2008, -1/+3mos accurate coment in this story
    • ohjames, on 01/25/2008, -1/+7Bandwidth costs money. Security consultants gotta get paid. At the very least, the attack strikes at CoS's bottom line; and the less money CoS has, the fewer spurious lawsuits it can launch, at least. Not that these DDoS's will come anywhere near bankrupting them. Baby steps.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 137 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.