What is Digg?32 Comments
- slipgrid, on 10/12/2007, -1/+16The BBC and CNN both had knowledge that the building was going to collapse, and then it did collapse. Who told them this? That's all we want to know! They didn't get it from independent research; they could've looked out the flipping window!
Please do project you inability to comprehend onto others. - slipgrid, on 10/12/2007, -1/+16Sigh, they didn't guess it was going to fall. They reported that it *fell* when the flipping thing was standing behind them. Two very different things. They didn't even look at the building. They were running on a script.
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13No it's not spam. Jim Hoffman's article verifies that BBC was reporting on the "collapse" of Building 7 -- just before the Reporter's Live feed drops out -- (approximately) five minutes before the building was demolished. I've read hundreds of comments on digg asking "how do we know when the report was actually aired?" The article helps answer that question.
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -3/+15Just some additional information about Building 7:
Video Clips of the building falling down
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWemhf8fZ2w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tr6_WRPZjIM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLnBSyc4ICo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th17YNqOCSk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmL9F-TSIes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ewf3zYS-QkA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzLqx_gjBAg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uPfKghBIOY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFsXzKa2ce0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
7 minute video presentation on the destruction of Building 7 on 9/11...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4556787288866368337&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=undefined
First Responders who were told by officials that the building was going to be "Brought Down" on purpose :
-Guns & Butter Radio interview - April 27th 2005:
Hosted by Bonnie Falkner
Guest: Indira Singh (Ground Zero Emergency Worker)
Bonnie: How long did you work as an emergency medical technician and exactly what is it that you were doing (at ground zero)?
Indira: ...when I got there we were setting up triage sites (at ground zero), close, very close to the area. The triage site that I was setting up was behind, well, to the east of Building 7 where Building 7 came down...
...we were setting up triages as close to the pile as possible… so what we were doing was setting up different kinds of stations… IV stations, cardiac stations, wound stations, burn stations ...just trying to have an organized space. What happened with that particular triage site is that pretty soon afternoon, after mid-day on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down... I do believe that they brought Building 7 down... By noon or one o'clock they told us we had to move from that triage site up to Pace University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or being brought down.
Bonnie: Did they actually use the word "brought down" and who was it that was telling you this?
Indira: The fire department... the fire department and they did use the word "we're going to have to bring it down."
Excerpt from above is heard approximately ten minutes into the interview.
Audio: http://www.gunsandbutter.net/archives.php?si=78
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden
Sep 20, 2006
Pacifica Radio's Guns & Butter
New York Stories: 9/11 First Responders
Audio stream:
http://www.gunsandbutter.net/archives.php?si=142
Show archive page is here:
http://www.gunsandbutter.net/archives.php?page=3
McPadden's speech begins at 46 minutes in
@ 48:14 he makes the following comments about what he witnessed while at Ground Zero on 9/11...
"They said you know you've got to stay behind this line because they're thinking about taking this building down, they're not sure if it's stable or not, so they were holding a line off because they had knowledge that something was gonna happen. Well, they pushed us back a little bit....a couple of minutes later they started coming down....people started coming back out to the street, I watched five New York City buses jam packed with people wanting to do search and rescue head down there towards Building 7 - people walk out into the middle of the street to see these people off, like bon voyage and right then Building 7 came down."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And here are a few people who witnessed Building 7 come down...
NYPD Officer (Retired) & 9/11 First Responder Craig Bartmer:
"I was real close to Building 7 when it fell down... That didn't sound like just a building falling down to me while I was running away from it. There's a lot of eyewitness testimony down there of hearing explosions. I didn't see any reason for that building to fall down the way it did -- and a lot of guys should be saying the same thing. I don't know what the fear is coming out and talking about it? I don't know -- but it's the truth."
[...]
"I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn't hear any... I didn't hear any creaking, or... I didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming 'get away, get away, get away from it!'... It was at that moment... I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself... Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the *****'s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you're hearing "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom." I think I know an explosion when I hear it... Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they're saying... Nothing to account for what we saw... I am shocked at the story we've heard about it to be quite honest."
Speaking Out: An interview with Craig Bartmer:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2283625397351664218&q
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Reporter Al Jones: "People started to run away from the scene [WTC7] and I turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion -- looked like it had been done by a demolition crew -- the whole thing just collapsing down on itself and another big huge plume of gray and white smoke shooting up into the air and then more of the smoke billowing up the street here... so that’s number one, number two, and now number seven that have come down from this explosion."
Live 9-11 Report from 1010 WINS NYC News Radio, presented in the documentary "911 Eyewitness" (Forward to 28:25)
Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=65460757734339444&q
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Emergency worker: "We were watching the building [WTC7] actually ‘cause it was on fire… the bottom floors of the building were on fire and… we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder… turned around -- we were shocked to see that the building was ah well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out… it was horrifying… about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that… we saw the building crash down all the way to the ground… we were in shock."
Live 9-11 Report from 1010 WINS NYC News Radio, presented in the documentary "911 Eyewitness" (Forward to 31:30)
Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=65460757734339444&q - stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12Correct link for Jim Hoffman's article:
http://www.wtc7.net/foreknowledge.html#bbc - lnf69, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12FTA:
"5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... " "
This comment tends to support a conspiracy theory more than what it tries to do, disprove it, IMHO.
Plus, how is it possible that they " no longer have the original tapes ". Aren't those part of the most important resources of a TV company? How can such important resources of one of the most important days in recent history just go missing?
Again, more doubts raised then facts proven. - FromTheColonies, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11The explanation by the head of BBC news regarding this video is pathetic. “We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of *****-up, not conspiracy)”. Wow, you are so incompetent you should resign immediately. Go back and run the Mickey Mouse magazine you fool. On 9/11 everything is explained with incompetence. The failure of the FBI, CIA, NSA to uncover the plot in advance was incompetence, the failure of airport security to stop the „terrorists“ to board the planes was incompetence, the failure of the Air Force to protect America was incompetence, the failure of the architects that build the towers that collapsed so easily was incompetence, the failure of the anti-aircraft protection around the Pentagon was incompetence, the removal of all the evidence from the crime scene of the century was incompetence, the failure to warn the first responders about the danger of the toxic dust was incompetence, and the total failure of the media to ask any questions about what really happened is also explained by incompetence. If all the people who are responsible in each area were so incompetent, why has not one single person been fired and held accountable for their failure? The chance of all this incompetence happening is a trillion to 1. This incompetence explanation is total crap. 9/11 was an inside job, period.
- FromTheColonies, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9So your father worked in the building. What does that prove? Nothing! It was evacuated hours before the collapse, so nobody who worked there knows how it came down. The issue at hand is and that's what the video shows, evidence of prior knowledge of the collapse. How is that possible? If the police finds a person who talks in advance about a crime and then the crime actually happens, don't you think they would question that person very thoroughly? They certainly would and he would be the prime suspect! In addition there are many people who worked in the basement of the South Tower and experienced huge explosions in the basement, BEFORE THE PLANE HIT. Explain all that!!!
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8We have witnesses on record who were told by officials that they were going to bring the building down on purpose. Your argument for "letting Building 7 go" is absurd. If you want to submit a story regarding the other issues you listed, have at it. But don't dis others for not spreading 9/11 truth the way you'd like it to be spread. Be a rock star and do your own thing.
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8oskite wrote: "This is just plain stupid."
To each his (or her) own. I think this is excellent exposure of Building 7 to the masses. - blyspi, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8the Truth is slowly coming out, I watched this building come down, buildings dont turn to dust.
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8unitdwerfaling's post reads like someone who doesn't belong to the 9/11 truth movement. I'm mean what's with all the "THEY" & THEM" references, dude? Are you really THAT paranoid or just trying to sound like you are so people won't take you seriously?
- chris9902, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8They would've gotten away with it if it hadn't been for those meddling kids.
- JudgeDreddEsq, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Joseph Goebbels
- showdown321, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Amen, brother. Amen.
- stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7While you're at it you should ask "how did you lose your tapes (evidence) to the biggest news story in modern history?" Oh that's right, it was a "***** up". My bad.
- FromTheColonies, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Answer to head of BBC news: You are not accused of being part of the 9/11 conspiracy. This is just a typical distraction from the real issue. Answer the question Mr. Porter, where did the BBC get the "news" the WTC7 building has collapsed, 25 minutes before it actually happened??? Go on and find out and follow the trail, and don't discredit the 9/11 truth movement that is doing the job you should be doing.
- lnf69, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7@Missourimama:
Gee you convinced me. Now I really changed my mind. Why didn't you just call all the tv stations and newspapers and tell them about how your father worked there for so much time.
//Sarcasm off.
Idiots calling others idiots.
Maybe I need a life, but you seem to need a brain that functions of it's own free will. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Find someone who has never seen or heard of the collapse of WTC 7 (there are plenty) and show it to them. Then tell me it's not important. Seeing the look on peoples faces when they see WTC 7 collapse for the first time is priceless.
- 0nslaught, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6What will these crazy conspiracy theorists say next?? :(
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The group, the Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, was founded in 1997. Among its supporters were three Republican former officials who were sitting out the Democratic presidency of Bill Clinton: Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz."
"And in a report just before the 2000 election that would bring Bush to power, the group predicted that the shift would come about slowly, unless there were 'some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.'" "That event came on Sept. 11, 2001. By that time, Cheney was vice president, Rumsfeld was secretary of defense, and Wolfowitz his deputy at the Pentagon."
ABC News
http://web.archive.org/web/20030315110705/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Like his father, Bush tries to keep a daily diary of his thoughts and observations. That night [9-11], he dictated:" "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A43708-2002Jan26¬Found=true
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ironically, just moments before the Department of Defense was hit by a suicide hijacker, Secretary Rumsfeld was describing to me why America needs to abandon its decade-old two-major-war strategy, and focus on the real threat facing us in the 21st century: terrorism, and the unexpected."
"And let me tell you, I've been around the block a few times. There will be another event." He repeated it for emphasis: "There will be another event." -- Donald Rumsfeld, the morning of September 11, 2001. "Within minutes of that utterance, Rumsfeld's words proved tragically prophetic."
house.gov
http://web.archive.org/web/20011104161754/http://www.house.gov/cox/press/releases/2001/091101terroristattack.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfowitz Warns of 'Surprise like Pearl Harbor' Months Before 9/11 Attacks
Posted Feb 8, 2007 10:32 PM PST
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/070207_wolfowitz.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diggers, we must unite to show these crazy conspiracy theorists that the above are all lies!
Why won't any Diggers step up to the plate? :( - stallion4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2True dat!
- makomike, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2On it's own, this BBC broadcast might be dismissed as an incorrect time sync, or an honest mistake from a poor BBC reporter who'd just landed, and was still suffering from jet lag, shell shock and disorientation.
But when you couple it to all of the other things that we DO know, you get another reason for a FULL IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION;
like the one that's going to happen in the Hague after the International court charges the dub and gang with War crimes; and I don't need insider trading tips to read that forecast.
There were a lot of loose lips around, and there still are.
The stock options, the no fly warnings, the " bombs in the building tapes ", the skeleton staff at the Pentagon impact point, the bizarre passenger lists with sparsely occupied jets, the dub and his " I saw the first jet hit the WTC ", the convenient " disappearance " of so many retired military bigwigs
( and their mistresses? ) and high tech weapons systems and computer wizards, NOT even mentioning all of the official warnings that everyone later lied about.
There was also a quagmire of unlikely/impossible/incredible/unsubstantiated/convenient scenarios involving hijacker lists in parked cars miraculously appearing, hijackers who managed to get onto planes without even being on the passenger lists, unprecedented implosions of three huge modern skyscrapers from two crashed jets, molten metal in the ground 8 weeks later, disappearing jet crashes, implausible and impossible flight aerobatics by talentless pilots, hijackers who turned up alive, black boxes dissolving into dust, seized video cameras, impossible phone calls from jets, ........and now a piece of video proof that the cat had been let out of the bag by someone on the other side of the PLOT who didn't think through the time lapse across the Atlantic.
That Britain is in on this goes without saying, having witnessed Blair's brown nosing technique and those pitiable scripts written by, I daresay the same inbreds that write the rest of British TV shows, like the bogus subway attack, or the foiled conspirators; I mean COME ON !!!!!
The slow minded person might be feeling that this is all moving too fast, or that the smoke and mirrors effects they're generating are pretty cutting edge, at least in Retardville they are; but us gringos with sharpened wits and street sense are all over this, and the predictability of the PLOT is laughable, though tragic and lethal at the same time.
Meanwhile I still contend patience.
Chauncey Gardner ( " Being There " ) might say something like this,
" The ripe fruit will fall to the ground, while the fruit that isn't ready will stay on the tree.
Shaking the tree will only loosen the fruit that was about to fall,
while the fruit that is still on the tree may die before ever ripening "
755 links by story title,
http://erroneousbusczh.homestead.com/9-11Plot.html - alexcarson, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I'm going to pretend to be an advocate for BBC. Here's what should have been said about their performance in regard to the subject at hand, with minimum spin. Imagine how much less squirmy and suspicious it would have appeared (than the actual attempt made by the head of news at BBC):
1. On 9/11/01, we pulled a report of the "collapse" of the Solomon Bros. Building/WTC 7 off the news wire (which was available to other news agencies) and reported it.
2. Subsequently, we have discovered, thanks to the submissions from viewers of archived BBC footage of 9/11, that during our report of the above "news", the building in fact still existed, and could be seen in the background of one of our reporters doing a live report.
3. Our reporter (as most people in America and the rest of the world) did not know what WTC 7 looked like, so did not recognize it in her background shot.
So we at BBC are left with some questions to answer:
Q. From where did that erroneous wire information originate?
A. We are investigating that now.
Wire sources are usually credible, but
have at times proven erroneous. When we find out about a wire error, the BBC always make the error known, and reports a correction. In this case, we were not made aware of the gaff until today.
Q. Why didn't any among our reporting crew take a moment to verify which building collapsed and try to identify the location of said building in the background of our live feed?
A. As stated before, at the time, relatively few people outside of NYC would be able to identify WTC 7 in a moments notice.
We would hope our viewers would understand the unique urgency and chaos of that day, and the subsequent increase in the possibility of receiving faulty information. However, we at the BBC regret this error, and are ivestigating it thoroughly. We will have a report on it in short order.
We thank those sharp-eyed individuals for making us aware of this error. Anything that can help the BBC maintain and even improve upon it's record of high quality, world class reporting is always appreciated. - iswasdoes, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I cant believe that some people are still acting as if theres NOTHING suspicious AT ALL about this. I know that 9/11 divides a lot of people, but come on...the building being reported to have collapsed before it did? How can anyone argue that this DOESNT lend creedence to the theory that the building was demolished?
Someone, somewhere TOLD them it was coming down, and that person needs to explain themself. Regardless where you stand on 9/11, thats a fact that cannot be doubted. - UNITDWERFALING, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4THEY are closing in on us/US and laughing all the way to their bunker, or do THEY think THEY are part of the CLIC, no THEY will be destroyed also when THEY are done with THEM! Call Jane 212-734-7363 her house,212-219-9570 BBC Production, 212-974-9050 Production Supervisor. Ring the phones OFF THE HOOK!!!!!!
- caveperson, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0A RENDEZVOUS WITH DESTINY. There is a mysterious cycle
in human events. To some generations much is given. Of
other generations much is expected. This generation of
Americans has a rendezvous with destiny.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
S O M E O F T H E A B O V E N E W S
====================::::::::::::::::::::::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::
===================================:::::::
Take a bite outa Fox
F O X A T T A C K S .C O M
Fox is not a credible news outlet and needs to be
stopped. Foxattacks.com will give you the information
and tools you need to hit fox where it hurts. The
current video presents the erroneous and slanted
stories Fox recently ran about Barack Obama. In
response, Obama refused to appear on Fox. Watch the
video, then follow Obama's lead and... Do Something.
FOX ATTACKS: OBAMA http://www.foxattacks.com
======
STOP THE ESCALATION IN IRAQ
Take Action: Contact Your Legislator
Model Legislation
Fact Sheet
State-by-State Data
National Press Advisory
National Press Release
Press Clips
Model State Press Release
Sign up for Updates on this Campaign:
http://www.progressivestates.org/content/524/
==========
Google Blogs Alert for: 9/11 inside job
SABOTAGE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. CONGRESS, CLEAN OUT THE COCKROACHES. By Bgilmore
These are the people who strong-armed Congress NOT to investigate 9/11, who used every ruse to stop an investigation and to avoid testifying before the 9/11 commission. Why? Because, they said....
http://www.democrats.com/node/12099
==========
Searching for 9/11 answers - By Derek Gentile,
Berkshire Eagle Staff Monday, February 19
Part of group believes government planned attacks
STOCKBRIDGE — As much as "mainstream America" might
wish it, the local members of the 9/11 Truth Movement
say their organization is not going away anytime soon.
"(An alternate theory of the attacks on Sept. 11,
2001, is) a scary thing for people to contemplate,"
said Renzo Del Molino. "And I understand that. The
realization that people in power are trying to hurt
us, and not help us, is very frightening to them. It's
frightening to me." View Full Story:
http://www.berkshireeagle.com/headlines/ci_5257730
http://www.berkshireeagle.com
=========
S P E E D - U P S
"The world situation is worsening to an alarming
degree. People all over the world are being called on
to help, and are making their individual contributions
as part of an overall prearranged plan. Part of the
plan is taking down "A Course in Miracles," and I am
fulfilling my part in the agreement, as you will
fulfill yours. You will be using abilities you
developed long ago, and which you are not really ready
to use again. Because of the acute emergency, however,
the usual slow, evolutionary process is being
by-passed in what might best be described as a
'celestial speed-up.'"
....That seemed so strange and bizarre to her
that she was ready to throw her notebook in the trash
basket, and yet it triggered something like a long ago
memory in her in which she said, "Of course I'll go,
Father: it's for such a little while."
Still, she was obviously not completely
satisfied, for she tried one more time to abdicate her
position. "Why me?" she asked. "I'm not religious: I
don't understand these things: I don't even believe
them. I'm about the poorest choice you could make."
The answer came back very clearly, "On the
contrary; you are an excellent choice. In fact, the
best."
"But why?" she anguished. And then, without a
hint of doubt she heard the answer: "Because you'll do
it."
Helen had no response to that. She knew the Voice
was right: she knew she would do it. And from that
moment on the future of "A Course in Miracles" was
set. Helen would "scribe" it to its completion, even
though she might raise loud objections all along the
way.
(From JOURNEY WITHOUT DISTANCE The Story Behind A
Course in Miracles, by Robert Skutch)
~~~~~~
S P E E D - B U M P S
BBC Hit Piece a Tissue of Lies, Bias and Emotional
Manipulation - prisonplanet.com
Outraged truth community demands answers from Guy
Smith, immediate retractions and apologies urged,
savage agenda driven yellow journalism an insult to
the truth
The BBC's Conspiracy Files documentary about 9/11 was
a tissue of lies, bias and emotional manipulation from
beginning to end. Producer Guy Smith should be ashamed
of himself for inflicting this travesty of yellow
journalism upon the 9/11 truth movement and he is
assured to encounter a vociferous and outraged
response in its aftermath.
Separated into two categories below are a number of
questions intended to highlight Guy Smith's production
for what it was - a deliberate hit piece on the 9/11
truth movement structured around fallacy, lying by
omission and overwhelming bias. We invite Mr. Smith to
respond to these questions and the hundreds of others
that are already being asked by furious and informed
community of people who were made sick to their
stomachs by Smith's yellow journalism hatchet job.
GROSS FACTUAL INACCURACIES AND YELLOW JOURNALISM:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6324
=====
Is the Military Our Last Hope?
By Paul Craig Roberts
Is the high command of the US military breaking ranks
with the Bush Regime?...
Perhaps America could regain its reputation if General
Pace would send a division of US Marines to arrest
Bush, Cheney, the entire civilian contingent in the
Pentagon, the neoconservative nazis, and the complicit
members of Congress and send them off to the Hague to
be tried for war crimes.
=====
Rabbi Michael Lerner & 9/11 Skepticism
A 9/11 Gov’t Conspiracy? ‘I Wouldn’t Be Surprised,’
Says Tikkun Editor
Daniel Treiman | Tue. Feb 06, 2007
Rabbi Michael Lerner, the longtime activist and editor
of Tikkun magazine, has published an essay saying he
is open to the possibility that the American
government may have been behind the September 11
terrorist attacks. http://www.911blogger.com/node/6006
=====
IS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE KUCINICH
GOING FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11?
[From 911blogger
http://www.911blogger.com/node/5850#comment ]
http://kucinich.us/
=====
DEAD ON ARRIVAL
The NIST 911 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse
By Mark H. Gaffney
http://rense.com/general74/nist.htm
=====
ARE YOU A 16 PERCENTER?
There is help for you!
If you are among the 16% who still believe the
Neonazicons' conspiracy theory about 9/11, YOU CAN BE
HELPED! Simply click on the links below to read the
scientific debunking of the Bush pseudoscience
fairytale about the WTC 9/11 atrocity.
http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/kevin_ryan/newstandard.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html
http://www.wtc7.net/events/kc_science/index.html
==========================
B E W E T H E M E D I A
==========================
Get Radio Active
HELP STOMP OUT
HUMAN-ANIMAL HYBRID KLEPTOCRATS!
U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:
http://www.airamericaradio.com
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL PROPHETS!
http://www.webspawner.com/users/newstudyshowsgodson
=====
To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
Enewsletter list please email
someoftheabovenews@yahoo.com with
REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
=====
And if you don't like our news go make some of your
own.
Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
Editor: Myra M. Jackson - dhill944, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1Building 7 pre-collapse warnings, pre-knowledge whatever, is not a big deal, the whole city just watched 2 huge building collapse, they all thought it was going to collapse, they were all anticipating the collapse, setting up safe zones etc.. Listen to Opey & Anthony segment with a fireman, it is possible that building 7 just collapsed due to structural failures, Why the 9/11 Activist are so pre-occupied with building 7 is beyond me. Did some Counter Intel control news releases that day? maybe or did they report on what was expected and not what happened, who cares!
The real issue here is why does BBC so obviously go out of its' way to not ask the hard questions from that day, ISI chief meeting with Porter Gauss the morning of attack, the 100, 000 transfer, the multiple warning from the russians, the multiple examples of stone walling from the FBI (crowley memo, etc.), the US and british energy policy to bring the Caspian Basin/BTC pipeline south through Afghanistan and not through through a former Russian State. Eye witness testimony from PEOPLE IN the towers.
We often can not see the forest becasue of all the trees, this is what the government wants, keep us talking about controversial topics and not the most obvious ones.
Let Building 7 Go! - oskite, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1No, not really. IIRC, she said something like 'is falling or in the process of falling'. She was no doubt getting all her information from multiple people. Maybe she also misheard or misunderstood what she'd been told. Or missaid it. Or got wrong information that turned out to be correct.
Don't get me wrong, I believe that the whole thing was a cover-up. Just not this. This is just plain stupid. - naich, on 10/12/2007, -12/+4Can I inject a note of rationalism here? To boil it down to basics, we've got 2 competing theories here:
1. The BBC reporter made a mistake in saying the collapse had happened when it hadn't.
2. The BBC reporter made a mistake in saying the collapse had happened when it hadn't because the people behind the vast conspiracy (for some baffling and incomprehensible reason) had tipped them off that it was going to happen.
Now, can we engage our rational minds and try to work out which is the simplest explanation?
No? Sigh. - oskite, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1Agreed. Story buried as obvious?
No? Sigh.
[edit] @Slipgrid: It's possible to guess that a building's going to fall before it does. The fact that they happened to be right means they *knew*? I doubt it. - Missourimama, on 10/12/2007, -11/+1You conspiracy feinds really need to get a life. My father worked in Building 7 since 1989, I guess he is a part of the conspiracy to hide what happend to WTC 7, you idiots really really need to get a life!
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm - dshPls, on 10/12/2007, -16/+2Buried as SPAM.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is