digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Iranian official calls for attack on UK

jpost.com — Fearing a US strike on Iran during President George W. Bush's last months in office, a senior Iranian official has suggested the Islamic regime should target London to deter such an attack. In an article on the Iranian Web site Aftab last week - translated by the Washington-based Middle East Media Research Institute - the head of the Europe and US

Who dugg this?

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

16 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • DCMacHead, on 10/26/2008, -1/+23But, but, but, Iran's just a little country! Obama said so!
  • RAltiere, on 10/26/2008, -2/+21It is difficult for some Americans to imagine what the attraction is to an Obama administration. In every aspect of international and domestic policy Obama's position is far, far left and certainly not what we need at this time when all issues are very complex.
    Further if properly analyzed - it seems Jewish Americans would be much wiser to rally for a McCain/Palin victory.
    Hopefully - American voters are using the next 9 days to read and give thoughtful consideration to their vote.
  • inactive, on 10/26/2008, -1/+19Haven't Islamic Neanderthals already attacked London, remember the subway bombing, attack at airport, and the infestation of Sharia loving Muslims in the UK in general and all of the daily crime that they have brought? Haven't you Islamic Neanderthals not done enough already? Please take your Sharia, your burkas and your evil, violent myopic view of God's world back to the cave of hira where the stooge started all of this from.
  • inactive, on 10/26/2008, -0/+17Yep, that's "the religion of peace" speaking . . . .
  • WARonTREES, on 10/26/2008, -0/+8"In the worst-case scenario, George Bush may perhaps persuade the president-elect to carry out an ill-conceived operation against Iran, prior to January 20, 2009 - that is, before the regime is handed over and he ends his presence in the White House. The next president of the US will have to deal with the consequences," he warned.

    that COULD be the worst-case scenario! i can't imagine how nobama would "deal with the consequences." well, i guess i could: universal health care for all the iranians.
  • PuterPrsn, on 10/26/2008, -0/+7Their desire is to work on this election the same way they worked on Spain, and the UK is much closer, making it easier. Then they'll put out notification (like they did in Spain) that if their chosen electee is not selected, we can expect worse to come.

    Remember, it worked in Spain, much to that's countrie's later regret - they didn't keep their word that they would no longer attack. What a surprise!
  • inactive, on 10/26/2008, -2/+8Iran just wants to bring the peace of Islam and civility to the corrupt society of england. Why do you hate PEACE and a society free of crime debauchery and corruption?
  • DCMacHead, on 10/26/2008, -0/+2Everything, numb skull. Obama's already said he'd play patty cake with them with no preconditions. I think how a Presidential candidate would respond to a belligerent nation is pretty ***** relevant, don't you?
  • mf0thrilla, on 10/27/2008, -0/+1Read* conservatives? You know you have 5 minutes to fix any grammatical errors you may have made in your comment before it posts.

    If REAL conservatives know what RAltier is talking about, then how could their minds be inquiring? They wouldn't need to inquire about anything, because they already have all the answers. That is, if they are REAL conservatives and not phony ones.

    I still haven't been informed about these so-called complex issues. I want to hear what Joe Blow Suburbanite has to say about them.

  • inactive, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1two things you seem to know a lot about, reek and propaganda.
  • tasine, on 10/27/2008, -0/+1Inquiring minds (read conservatives) know what RAltier is talking about.
  • mf0thrilla, on 10/26/2008, -2/+1What does Obama have to with this article?
  • mf0thrilla, on 10/26/2008, -2/+1Care to explain these "complex" issues? Inquiring minds want to know.
  • mf0thrilla, on 10/26/2008, -3/+2Who are you talking to? I don't think Neanderthals have access to the Internet in their caves.
  • mf0thrilla, on 10/27/2008, -2/+1LOL! You sound pissed!

    Yes. A Presidential candidate's response to a belligerent nation is very relevant. But this article is 1.) A complete fabrication, or a very dramatic work of fiction 2.) Has an obvious religious bias towards Judaism 3.) Written to scare you (which it probably has)

    Nowhere does it mention Obama, but I understand your beef with him... he's the only crutch you have.



  • inactive, on 10/27/2008, -3/+1Iran attack the United Kingdom? How? Sorry but this reeks of the most ridiculous propaganda.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...

© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.