digg

Join DiggAbout

Digg Townhall Tonight!
Tune into the live Digg townhall tonight at 5:00pm PST/8:00pm EST.

See the original image at spiegel.de —

Insights into Cyber-Jihad: Tracking the Terrorists Online

spiegel.de — For years, al-Qaida and other terror groups have set up shop in the Internet. Those who track them have covertly followed. The companies SITE and IntelCenter have penetrated even deeper into the terror Web than most intelligence agencies.

show profanity settings
expand all
  • FireStalker, on 08/30/2008, -4/+6somebody call netforce!
  • nirvanix, on 08/30/2008, -19/+8Oh they tracked Al Qaeda and I'd like to guess what they found - the CIA?
    • axle00, on 08/30/2008, -8/+5Too bad he's right
      • use2bacanadian, on 08/30/2008, -6/+8Too bad he is right? About? Looking for Al Queda and finding the CIA? What does that mean? The CIA is in bed with Al Queda?? I see some wrinkles in your tin foil hat moron. Get off the pot and stop watching TV. Go get a real education from a reputable university and do some world travel. Nut cases like you are an embarrassment to Digg.
    • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -4/+4Nirvanix, what the ***** dude?
      We're supposed to get our stories straight! no one will believe us like that.
      It wasn't the CIA, it was the JEWS THAT INFILTRATED THE CIA, CONTORL THE MEDIA, AND USED STOLEN ALIEN TECHNOLOGY TO FAKE THE 9/11 ATTACKS.
  • arjie, on 08/30/2008, -2/+12Ha ha, okay, I know it isn't funny, but this reminds me of the time when my (Indian) government found some blogspot blog and a yahoo groups group that had terrorist propaganda and coordination information on it, so they told the ISPs and then _all_ of blogspot and yahoo groups were banned. It was pretty funny laughing at their incompetence.
    • ortucis, on 08/30/2008, -0/+2Yup, ISP's here are pretty retarded.
  • diggafrica, on 08/30/2008, -12/+5Alahu Akbar! . The infidels will suffer (click click.. sends a virus.. )
  • Tssst, on 08/30/2008, -13/+8No one likes a persecuted group that actually fights back.
    • 140Suffolk, on 08/30/2008, -0/+8Who's the persecuted group?
      • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -1/+7Arab men born in Riyadh, to rich business men with connections to the Saudi Royal Family, raised as devout Sunni Muslims, with beliefs that the restoration of Sharia law will set things right in the Muslim world, and that all other ideologies—"pan-Arabism, socialism, communism, democracy"—must be opposed.
    • solid12345, on 08/30/2008, -1/+4More Muslims are persecuted by other Muslims than by us infidels.
      • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -0/+3Well, more Muslims than our infidel troops are killed by Muslim suicide bombings, so I guess Tssst does have a point.
    • novaculus, on 08/30/2008, -2/+1Tssst thinks dragging their barbaric Bronze Age asses out of their historic ***** is persecution.
  • axle00, on 08/30/2008, -15/+8The only (well, almost all) real terrorists are governments. All big "flashy" acts of terrorism are False Flag Terrorism, either done directly by governments, or government supported. i.e. The Gulf of Tonkin incident, The U.S.S Liberty Incident, and of course, the biggest one of all 9/11. "Real" terrorism, is almost never reported because, this just gives attention and legitimacy to real terrorists (which is exactly what the terrorists want, so therefore the best thing to do is NOT report it). However government-sponsored False Flag Terrorism is always reported, since the media is controlled, and is directed to report the "terrorist" incident, thereby making the public fearful and willing to give up their rights and freedoms, for so-called security. And for those of you willing to give up your freedoms for so-called security, maybe you should keep this in mind:

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -Benjamin Franklin

    Unfortunately it seem that Americans are all too willing to do just that.
    • poidh, on 08/30/2008, -3/+7Wow, there are some idiots in this thread and you are the biggest yet.
    • use2bacanadian, on 08/30/2008, -3/+5The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving North Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in one of the torpedo boat's sinking. On August 4, 1964, the American destroyers reported a second engagement with North Vietnamese boats.In 2005, an official NSA declassified report revealed that the USS Maddox first fired on the North Vietnamese torpedo boats August 2 incident and that there may not have been North Vietnamese boats at the August 4. The report said
      It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night. In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged that night the salvage of two of the boats damaged on 2 August.
      In the rules of war just like the rules domestic assault, you do not have to wait to be attacked in order to respond. Responding to the threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force is legal, moral and ethical.

      The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a neutral U.S. Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, in international waters north of the northern Sinai Peninsula coast, about 25.5 nautical miles northwest of the minaret at El Arish, by Israeli jet fighter planes and motor torpedo boats on June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 and wounded more than 170 crew members, and damaged the ship severely. Shortly after the attack ended, Israel informed the U.S. that its forces had attacked the Liberty in error. An Israeli Inquiry Commission composed of one person, Colonel Ram Ron, concluded that the attack was caused by a chain of mistakes by Israel Defense Force (IDF) personnel. The IDF, in its History Report about the attack, says it asked the United States to inform them of any U.S. ships in the area but was not told of the Liberty's presence. The IDF air and naval forces, respectively, misidentified the Liberty as an unknown destroyer and the Egyptian cargo ship El Quseir. Supporters of Israel's explanation say that no credible motive existed for Israel to initiate a surprise attack against an important ally and the possibility of such mistakes were inherent in the tense atmosphere of the Six-Day War. The United States government was concerned about such dangers and ordered the Liberty further away from shore but the order was not received in time due to a series of communication failures. In the IDF's History Report about the attack, it points out that that "though the attack on the armed forces of a friendly nation is a most regrettable and painful occurrence, incidents of this kind do occur in war-time."

      The only "False Flags" are the false flags of conspiracy theorists like yourself.

      • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -1/+2I dugg you down, only so I could digg you back up twice.
      • StopTheLie, on 08/30/2008, -2/+2--"The only "False Flags" are the false flags of conspiracy theorists like yourself."--

        Ya, because the Anthrax attacks, which were coordinated / carried out by individuals within our own government (and made to "look like" the work of "Muslim Terrorists") never really happened.
      • use2bacanadian, on 08/30/2008, -2/+2I rest my case!!!! Thank you for proving my point. Another conspiracy theory that has been disproven.

        WASHINGTON, Aug. 8 (UPI) -- The U.S. Justice Department said Friday that Steven Hatfill was not involved in anthrax mailings for which he was listed six years ago as a person of interest.
        The Justice Department agreed in June to pay $4.6 million to settle Hatfill's lawsuit against the government, but until Friday the government had not exonerated him, The New York Times reported.
        "We have concluded, based on laboratory access records, witness accounts and other information, that Dr. Hatfill did not have access to the particular anthrax used in the attacks, and that he was not involved in the anthrax mailings," Jeffrey Taylor, the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, said in a letter to Hatfill's lawyer.Officials say they believe the anthrax mailings were committed by military scientist Bruce Ivins, who died recently after taking an overdose of painkillers.

        PALM BEACH, Fla., Aug. 17 (UPI) -- Reports of mental illness suffered by a U.S. anthrax researcher have boosted the outlook for a Florida attorney suing the federal government.
        Richard Schuler's $50 million lawsuit in the 2001 anthrax death of a tabloid photo editor may be aided by news that scientist Bruce Ivins may have suffered from paranoid delusions, The Palm Beach Post reported Sunday."To put a guy that mentally unstable in charge of these substances makes me shudder," Schuler said. "But it strengthens our case. It shows the security was bad."Florida law requires any laboratory involved with ultra-hazardous materials to protect members of the general public by avoiding an unauthorized interception and dissemination of the materials.
        Schuler expects his case on behalf of Bob Stevens' family to be able to use new FBI information alleging that Ivins was responsible for mailing a series of anthrax-laced letters that took the lives of five people, including Stevens. Schuler also believes the case could force an airing of government evidence against Ivins, who committed suicide July 29 after being informed of murder charges being filed against him.
      • StopTheLie, on 08/30/2008, -2/+2Are you serious? That is your rebuttal? The latest patsy is "Ivins" (who is now conveniently dead) and he was a government employee. Besides the fact that FEW accept that Ivins is responsible, the letters WERE written specifically to frame "Muslim Terrorists."

        In other words (since you're apparently not following) the attacks were made to LOOK LIKE they came from people outside of the US government, when in fact the Anthrax and the attacks originated from within. ...got it?
      • use2bacanadian, on 08/30/2008, -2/+2You have a bigger imagination than you have education or common sense. Where is your EVIDENCE that Irvin's was a "patsy"? Hearsay from your drug addicted so conspiracy theorists is not evidence. Irvin's was traced by the FBI through DNA evidence to the source of the Anthrax. Of COURSE he worked for a "government lab" no one else has the capability to manufacture weapons grade anthrax. His motivation was to boost interest in his private venture dealing with a cure to anthrax poisoning. He stood to become a multi billionaire. In words maybe that you can understand, he stood to become a very rich man if the government were to buy his cure for anthrax poisoning. He needed an anthrax scare to make that happen so he caused one to happen. When he was clearly caught he committed suicide by an overdose of drugs. This is not a government sanctioned conspiracy to start a war - where is the evidence for that? In fact the FBI RULED OUT the idea that it was a foreign terrorist incident. From US News and World report: "But by then the FBI already knew anthrax spilling out of letters addressed to media outlets and to a U.S. senator was a military strain of the bioweapon. "Very quickly [Fort Detrick, Md., experts] told us this was not something some guy in a cave could come up with," the ex-FBI official said. "They couldn't go from box cutters one week to weapons-grade anthrax the next."
        What else can you come up with brain surgeon?!!
      • StopTheLie, on 08/31/2008, -2/+1Where is your "EVIDENCE" that he isn't a patsy? What's that? You're using the same "evidence" I'm using? (media reports) Oh wow...so I guess since we're both forming our opinion based on what we've read; it simply becomes a matter of whose opinion (given all the admitted facts) "adds up" the best.

        The first strike against you is that you're relying heavily on the ad hominem approach. This is a notoriously weak tact, used mainly by those who can't form a substantive argument / need to distract people from the weakness of the case they’ve presented. I, on the other hand, am simply pointing out the "holes" your case so that others can make a more informed decision.

        So, let's continue: Originally those who benefited most from the attacks (The NeoCons - For more info on them read their plans for "Pax Americana" written 1 year prior to the 9/11 attacks in "Rebuilding America's Defenses") capitalized on the "Muslim written letters" by pointing at Osama and Saddam. (So, those blamed were NOT guilty and those doing "the blaming" were the main benefactors.) The administration was "conveniently" on Cipro (from FDA.gov "Cipro is approved for use in patients who have been exposed to the inhaled form of anthrax.") weeks BEFORE the Anthrax attacks took place. Also, it's interesting to note that the "prime targets" of the attacks were those who were standing in the way of legislation (the so-called "Patriot Act") that the NeoCons were trying to ram through Congress.

        Now, this all started because you said: "The only False Flags are the false flags of conspiracy theorists like yourself."

        If you actually believe this, it is you (not me) who needs to get a "bigger education." You can start with looking into the attacks Hitler used as justification to invade Poland and seize power in Germany. Or maybe read up on Operation Gladio. -Better yet, just look up the term "false flag" and you'll find that it is a "LEGITIMATE" and well-established military tactic.

        Don't think those (looking to secure otherwise unattainable military objectives) in the US government would ever conspire to use such tactics? Read the Northwoods document. (You might find the part where they talk about CREATING a terrorist campaign in Washington DC especially interesting .)

        As for me, I stand by my assertion above: The attacks were made to LOOK LIKE they came from people outside of the US government, when in fact the Anthrax and the attacks both originated from within."

        If you want to accept the "lone nut who wanted to make some money" theory; that's your right. (Though, I must say, it reminds me of the "just a few bad apples decided to torture" narrative that was so prevalent a couple years ago.)

        Based on all of the KNOWN incidents of people in “our government” abusing their power, and based on all of the information that has come out AGAINST the current "Ivins did it" theory, I’m not buying it.
      • use2bacanadian, on 08/31/2008, -2/+2You do not have ONE fact! At least I have quoted the people who are actually charged with investigating this incident. You do not even provide a link!!!! You are nothing but an illiterate misguided juvenile dope smoking truther without a single fact or anything constructive to add.
      • StopTheLie, on 08/31/2008, -2/+2use2bacanadian wrote: "You are nothing but an illiterate misguided juvenile dope smoking truther without a single fact or anything constructive to add."

        There you go again with the ad hominem approach. I rest my case (got nothing better, ehh?)

        -And for the record: I'm 39 (probably older than you) I haven't "smoked dope" in decades; I don't even drink alcohol (stopped drinking in March of 1991 - over 17 years ago.) Grow up...seriously.



      • StopTheLie, on 08/31/2008, -2/+2...oops, typo (I'm 38...for a few more months anyway :-)
      • use2bacanadian, on 08/31/2008, -2/+1It doesn't matter what your chronological age is....you reasoning abilities are those of an illiterate and poorly traveled juvenile with no common sense or critical reasoning abilities. So tell me why the "government" would want to poison its own people? Do you think the government is run by robots? Do you think the decision makers in this society are so cynical and so evil that they would kill innocent civilians to stay in power at great risk of being caught and being held accountable in a court of law with the death penalty a realistic punishment? Do you think that every citizen of this country, especially those in decision making levels of the government have not learned the lessons of WW1 - WW2? It is ONLY TRUTHERS who are stupid enough to believe that there are rogue elements in government who go unabated in their evil plans and conspiracies. You cant even get a blow job in the white house and keep it a secret. Every conspiracy theory has been disproved through Science and Technology. That includes Tonkin Gulf , Kennedy's assassination, 9-11, and the Anthrax scare. If you get your education from the discovery channel than you are at a terrible intellectual disadvantage to people with educations and life experience to the point that you come out looking like an ignorant anti authoritarian idiot. There WAS no government conspiracy - this was ONE unbalanced scientist with access to anthrax and ambitions of becoming wealthy. The "government" (whatever that is in your simple mind) is NOT SUPER COMPETENT and in addition is mostly made of of people who are honest and have integrity and a sense of right, wrong, and an understanding of history and the laws that govern them. SOMEONE will always rat out a criminal.
      • StopTheLie, on 08/31/2008, -1/+2I think it's funny that you attack my reasoning when it's clear that your capacity to "conclude" is entirely dependent on your own (terribly naïve) world view: "Government is good - Evil people in government don't exist anymore. Ridiculous.

        I notice that you keep ignoring the information I've given you that could help you overcome this mental deficit. Worse, having ignored it, you then babble on as if you know what you're talking about.

        For instance, you talk about "government having learned the lessons of WW1 and WW2," while ignoring the fact that both Operation Gladio and Operation Northwoods took place AFTER WW2. Have you looked up either? (Both have been extensively documented.) -Or maybe you'll just dismiss the National Security Archive as the home of Conspiracy Theorists who can't reason. Maybe you'll dismiss Dr. Daniel Ganser's excellent work (that earned him his PHD – “NATO's Secret Armies”) as a man who's research and reasoning skills are inferior to your own.

        I’m just about done wasting my time with you (“Pearls before swine” and all that) but I will, just for good measure, point out the biggest flaw in how your mind operates.

        Most of your arguments are known in LOGIC as “logical fallacies.” For instance, you posit that if Clinton was unable to keep his blowjob secret, that secrets involving people in government cannot be kept. Now, in order for me to disprove this premise (“falsify” your theory) I only need one instance that proves you’re wrong. (So, you’ve basically painted yourself into a corner.) Are you waiting for my ONE example? OK, how about the Manhattan Project. – look it up yourself. It was a little more involved than a blowjob. Also, you seem to forget ALL of the continually “declassified” documents that WERE “kept secret” until they became “declassified.”

        Another argument that comes from your types ( I’m not sure what pejorative I should use…since you have labeled me a “Truther,” and we appear to be opposites, does that make you a “Liar?”) Anyway, you always ask the question “why would somebody in government commit some criminal act.” I have never understood this question. They would do it for the same reason any criminal commits a criminal act: Because they’re a criminal, they expect to get something they want, and they expect to get away with it.

        The big difference between the “common criminal” and a “government criminal” is that a common criminal cannot obstruct investigations from inside the system. They cannot seal documents, confiscate video tapes or appoint their own investigators. They cannot subpoena witnesses, find out what the witnesses know, and then use the information they've obtained to more effectively whitewash their crime.

        Why would men in government participate in the Tuskegee Experiment? (Look it up – it’s part of your homework.) If you’re looking for an answer that survives some kind of “moral” test you’re not going to find an acceptable “why.” (Anymore than you’ll find one that explains why a man would grab a child, rape the child, cut the child’s head off, and bury the body in a ditch. –“Why” somebody would do something, in terms that we would understand, is less important than IF they have done it.) If there is evidence that something has been done, that evidence trumps preconceived notions about what a person (acting alone or within government) is capable of.

        It seems to me that you're not disputing the Anthrax came from a US government source, you're not disputing that it was made to look like it was sent from "Muslim Terrorists," you're not disputing that the attacks were used to hype fear and justify the wars that followed, and you're not disputing that the man who (supposedly) committed the crime was a government employee.

        What you're saying is that it's impossible that it was anything more than a "lone nut." I say, given all I've know about how those in charge of “geopolitical strategy” operate, that your assertion is terribly naive. (Or, to use your own words: "you reasoning abilities are those of an illiterate and poorly traveled juvenile with no common sense or critical reasoning abilities.")

      • StopTheLie, on 08/31/2008, -1/+2And, for the record, I've never said that "all people" in government are evil. I don't believe that at all. But when it comes to directing government power toward evil means / evil ends, a handful of people who lack "honesty / integrity" are enough.

        Example: Operation Ajax. When the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953 (using false-flag tactics by the way) there wasn't a "big huddle" where everyone in government was gathered to discuss the plan. It was a very SMALL group within the government that orchestrated and carried out the coup. (And, since it was such a success, they did the same thing in Guatemala the following year - and have done it in countless other countries since.)
      • use2bacanadian, on 09/02/2008, -2/+1Well - stopthe lie - you "are about done with me" because your LOGIC is FALSE. You have no evidence, look up the word, and you lack the ability to think logically (you have no training in philosophy or logic) and you do not even comprehend what the word "evidence means. You beat around the bush, ignoring the facts, bringing up ancient history from OTHER governments and display it as if it is true in the US as well. Where is the evidence for your argument????!!!! I am still waiting bit I lend NO credibility to fringe elements like yourself who will believe ANYTHING that supports their warped view of the world, just like ID Theorists and 911 conspiracy believers.
      • use2bacanadian, on 09/03/2008, -1/+1Ya - that's what I thought stopthelie - nothing else intelligent to say, no facts to put forth to support your evidence - no critical thinking - no common sense and no evidence. I rest my case!
  • s0m31john, on 08/30/2008, -9/+3Terrorists use foxfire.exe
  • PL3NTY, on 08/30/2008, -7/+9durka durka mohammed jihad
  • cannibaljp, on 08/30/2008, -6/+1pretty interesting read, really. i always wonder why the sites and boards that the "news" outlets report on as being "jihadist websites" are always obscured. ever notice that you never see the URL of these sites?

    i dig the fact that these guys are in there and working it from their angle. very web 2.0 meets random spy / espionage story...
    • BinderGang, on 08/30/2008, -2/+2You wondered this? The URL is obscured because people would go, they'd be sending traffic to the sites. And than who knows, the sites could change some minds.
      • cannibaljp, on 08/30/2008, -1/+1Wait - don't you think that most people would go and spout off random anti jidahist rhetoric and rail about how they are all going to die?

        Have you ever read any forum posts? Perhaps you should take a look at the comments section under the videos in the very popular website called youtube.

        Exposing the forums to the "light of day" could help to flood them with so much traffic that they become useless for the purposes that they were intended for? Want to see the Digg effect take down an extremist website? Want to see a 4chan guy who gets some lulz from hacking the admin password of a website that is promoting violent acts, only to replace the main page with a copy of the cartoon drawing of Mohammad?
      • BinderGang, on 08/30/2008, -0/+1cannibaljp-
        Do you think mainstream media and major news stations/papers/etc. want to see the sites get 'pwned' by a bunch of techies and hackers/crackers?

        No. They are thinking of the majority of America, regular people, children, etc. Those people would not go to the sites to 'take them down'.
      • cannibaljp, on 08/30/2008, -0/+1perhaps you're right that the regular folks wouldn't "take them down" but the would flood the site. they would overrun the server, even if they didn't mean to do it. hell, have a website get mentioned on Oprah, and see what happens to it - they didn't mean to bring it down, but it does happen.
    • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -1/+2We use these websites to gather Intel. Once we admit "we've found out about site: X", surely no one will use that site anymore.
      • cannibaljp, on 08/30/2008, -0/+3that's a fair assessment, and a reasonable line of logic!
      • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -0/+2Hence why I've been dugg down :)
  • Jerg3726, on 08/30/2008, -3/+2Ok, I didnt read it yet, but the title just screams 'South Park'

    (the spoof of 24)
  • WTFppl, on 08/30/2008, -7/+7Buried for propaganda!
  • bullhead2007, on 08/30/2008, -4/+3Uh oh! I'm scared that there might be suicide e-mail bombers. Or, science forbid, they get their hands on an ICMP Nuke! Who knows how many unprotected ports they could slip one of those into! I hope they don't hijack an American Airlines website and crash it causing a cascading failure of the travel industry.

    Okay that's as far as I could go.
  • zumdahl999, on 08/30/2008, -2/+1Al-Qaida and similer terrorist groups must be considered as cults because they do not represent true Islam and its teachings. Jihad is a totally different concept than what is known worldwide. It is the Islamic term of self-defense and it has nothing to do with terrorising and killing innocent folks. In my humble opinion, Al-Qaida and other fanatic terrorist groups are brainwashing suicidal cults and they do not differ from the kingdom of heaven cult or Jim Jones's cult group!!.
  • McCain4eva, on 08/30/2008, -6/+0Good, These cyber Jihadists need to be shot....american style. Keep up the good work guys, we got em on the run!!

    McCain 08!
    • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -2/+3Libtard posing as a Rightard. Typical Diggtard.

      Tards 08!
    • rex84, on 08/30/2008, -2/+1"These cyber Jihadists need to be shot....american style. "
      What's that, you mean flown to a secret jail, in a foreign country, and shot?
  • th3heretic, on 08/30/2008, -2/+11I cross referenced his MySpace with his Youtube account...
  • Borgcube636, on 08/30/2008, -3/+10I thought all of us were terrorists... you know? Why else is our government spying on us?
    • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -1/+4Don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure the government is just trying to get hand of my kick ass porn collection.
      Just the other day I checked my logs, and saw an unauthorized access from www.cia.com to the file: Jenna_Jameson_Meets_Silvia_Saint.wmv.
      Haha, losers, I quickly replaced it with a video of two shemales going at it. That should teach the government a lesson!
  • rex84, on 08/30/2008, -3/+5There are terrists under yer bed, they're in yer closets, they're in yer internets!
    • dkapuchino, on 08/30/2008, -3/+3Tell that to the citizens of new york in 2001, the citizens of India, Pakistan, Israel, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Southern Thailand, The Philipines, London.
      Terrorism is a real threat.

      Hush little rexy, don't say a word, and never mind that noise you heard.
  • murphy11211, on 08/30/2008, -1/+3I've seen video's of terrorist training camps....

    They've got them running through the tubes and everything.
  • xyplex2, on 08/30/2008, -0/+2these guys are retarded, my friend does a WAY better job and he actually talks to Al Qaida people all the time. His site is

    www.terroristmedia.com

    they probably rip off my friends information that he gathers, I had the Bin Ladin audio broadcast a week before the freaken news agency had it.

    he also runs www.federaljack.com
  • DeuceDiggalow, on 08/30/2008, -3/+1Terrorist = Anyone who's not a far-right republican
  • BotchaMcCoola, on 08/30/2008, -1/+4It doesn't matter much. Our FBI, Homeland Security, and their International counterparts have kept us safe from terrorist crimes since the 911 wake-up call and they will continue to do so. I know some of our FBI work. It is very good and yes they do in fact use profiling regardless of what you may hear. Still they can't be lax in anyway. Atta and his friends were shockingly clever. Similar types might develop another clever plan and might be working in Belgium or likes right now like Atta and friends were doing in Germany. Worse still, it would be easier for them to get greater funding now from Saudis and other rich anti-Americans in the Mid-East.
  • playuhh, on 08/30/2008, -1/+1Thats my fantasy football team name :) Cyber-Jihad
  • ErickStevenson, on 08/30/2008, -2/+4So... suicide bombers are online now? ***** it, they are ***** everywhere nowadays... gotta check my shoes everyday, sometimes I think they hide there, can never be too safe!
  • Hangly, on 08/31/2008, -2/+2There is no Al Qaeda.
  • ecomanUW, on 08/31/2008, -1/+1Hey good thing we have an internet patriot act already written for just such a reason! Say goodbye to the internet as we know it.
    http://digg.com/security/Internet_Censorship_is_On ...
  • Zambelli, on 08/31/2008, -0/+0Terrorspam. You'd expect McCain to tell you this kind of stuff.
  • g00dETH3R, on 09/01/2008, -0/+1From recent spiegel.de articles they sound like a German version of fox or cnn.
    ***** the Internet patriot act and anybody who diggs this fear mongering bull ***** up.


  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.