What is Digg?11 Comments
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -4/+9No, he's right. Of all the truther ***** out there this is among the most lame. Buried as spam.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -3/+8The problem is we HAVE posted counter arguments, TIME and TIME again. Then someone like you comes along, posting the same BS again, like it is new. You are the target market for this crap, like getting your first nigerian scam email and thinking you are in the money.
This just happens to be an especially lame set of BS. Go take the time to investigate the other side of the story, and you will see you have been had.
Start here: http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
http://scotthobbs.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=76&Itemid=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/nyregion/02conspiracy.html?ex=1179460800&en=9660aeaf574a73cd&ei=5070
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.healthbolt.net/2007/02/14/26-reasons-what-you-think-is-right-is-wrong/
http://www.911myths.com/html/omissions____chapter_1.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11818067/the_low_post_the_hopeless_stupidity_of_911_conspiracies/2 - Cyre, on 10/10/2007, -5/+9Buried as the LAMEST ever truther lies.
- Hortnon, on 10/10/2007, -3/+6Any chance of a list?
I mean, you made that demand of us, the least you could do is do the same. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Explosive residue is not the only sign of a controlled demolition. Use of explosives leaves a great deal of easily visible evidence including unique damage markings and remnants of materials used to carry out the detonation, including blasting caps, brackets used to secure explosives to columns, and thousands of feet of detonation cord. In regular demolitions these are littered throughout the debris pile in vast quantities.
During the cleanup process at Ground Zero, approximately 40,000 people worked on the site. These people came from a diverse range of industries, with a wide range of experience and expertise. These included ironworkers, search and rescue teams, forensic scientists, FBI special agents, FBI evidence response teams, engineers, construction workers, military personnel, CIA agents, FEMA staff, aviation crash investigators, police officers, firemen, paramedics, and demolition crews. Not one single person who worked in this site has ever testified to having found any evidence of a controlled demolition, despite the fact that some have suffered severe medical harm and even death as a result of toxic dust at the site. People who are dying due to destroyed lungs because the government said it was safe to work at Ground Zero have no vested interest whatsoever in hiding evidence that the official account of the attacks is false. - Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -5/+5Part2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ4cNxFVNow
Part3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rG7RoEW_Ak
Part4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdUOTJaCkm0
Part5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r81RCp7mqY
Part6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSJws-Yxsyc
I denied it. I was violently opposed to it. I now accept it. Where do you draw the line?
I have seen all the debunk information and it just simply cannot explain away all of what is presented here. When I first started seeing Loose Change stories a couple years ago on Digg I used to make fun of the truthers and post counter arguements, but I never watched any of their videos. I dismissed them as idioitic to have presented any thought other than terrorists attacking us. I can't explain the other questions that arise, but how can I explain away what has been presented? I fully understand Occam's razor, but that principle isn't always right...
What can you do about it if you believe? Inform people. Be rational. Be respectful. Just don't sit there and expect the world to get better on its own.
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. - Jimi - Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4I've read all of it and BOTH sides omit items.
- Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -6/+5If you're going to take the time to bury then at least post a counter argument. Otherwise you're simply not listening and never will.
- Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -5/+4I'd love to see the counter argument then. Also, this is the only story i've submitted. Is that all you people can do is willfully dismiss something without even taking the time to view it and call it spam?
- Daedalus81, on 10/10/2007, -5/+4Did you actually watch it? I doubt it because its a total of 60 minutes and you posted ~10 minutes after discovering the story. Group 2?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is