digg

Join DiggAbout

Digg Townhall Tonight!
Tune into the live Digg townhall tonight at 5:00pm PST/8:00pm EST.

See the original image at 911truth.org —

Flashback: Top 40 Reasons To Doubt The Offcial 9/11 story

911truth.org — How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital?

show profanity settings
expand all
  • sadekjake, on 08/29/2008, -3/+8Maybe there are things you didnot know. Share your opinions.
  • GovernmentSp00k, on 08/30/2008, -3/+828-Year Career CIA Official Says 9/11 An Inside Job

    William Christison, Former National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis. 29-year CIA veteran:
    " I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them. David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too. I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen...The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes. All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions."
    http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Aug06/Christison14.h ... http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/september ...
  • sadekjake, on 08/30/2008, -3/+6have you ever seen the movie "loose change"? they proved a lot of the cases to be fake and arranged with reference to science and facts.

    if you want to download the movie (its a legally free download) just google it: "download loose change".
    • Herkimer56, on 08/30/2008, -4/+4Loose Change was nothing more than a collection of lies, junk science, assumptions and innuendos. That's why they keep re-making it. Someone points out their lies so they go back to the editing room, take out the old lies and put in new ones.

      http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
      • sadekjake, on 08/30/2008, -3/+2sorry for you, but new editions does not mean that they are changing their words.

        they say their logics (loose change), and show enough reasons and proofs behind their claims.

        for instance, how can you debunk their theory behind the case they explain: a small hole in pentagon's wall despite the fact that it was hit by a large plane? and still, the plane did manage to penetrate throrugh the building to get to the center.

        be educated man. and stop being such a fool. the link you mentioned is a jealous approach to debunk something which has got a lot of notice.
      • Herkimer56, on 08/30/2008, -1/+4Sure they did. Watch the various editions and you'll see that a lot of things, like the completely debunked crap about the cel phones, have just disappeared.

        How can I debunk their idiocy about the Pentagon? How about pictures of aircraft debris found inside the Pentagon as well as out on the lawn? Idiot.

        http://digg.com/educational/Top_Ten_Photos_9_11_Co ...
    • trogdoor, on 08/30/2008, -3/+1Actually they charge for the "Final Cut", not sure why if they really just want to spread the "truth".
      • card51short, on 09/03/2008, -0/+1omg are you serious? They charge for a DVD they made!!! Well then it has to be false!!!

        Great point!
        LOL...that all you got?
  • sadekjake, on 08/30/2008, -3/+3and what about farhenheit 911?
  • Rhotel1, on 08/30/2008, -0/+2The Air National Guard unit at Andrews was a "tactical fighter unit" - on 9/11, it was not part of the NORAD team and it had no aircraft on alert or configured with air-to-air missiles. The first two aircraft that it launched at direct request of a senior White House Secret Service Agent who was friends with the Commander or Operations Officer of the Air Guard unit were unarmed. Much was written about this unit as well as the four NORAD alert aircraft that were launched; two from Otis and two from Langley. Before you go speculating about what happened from air defense side, learn what really happened and start by learning exactly what was in place on the morning of 9/11. One of the websites that popped up that fall claimed that aircraft should have been scrambled from 33 different bases - some of these did not even have runways or assigned aircraft - one of those was Bolling AFB, HQ US Air Force, an office complex, with no runways - another was a sea launched ballistic missile detection radar site, again no runways.
  • ciberhispano, on 08/31/2008, -0/+0Good question here? Because they are friends? http://kaboomstocks.com/marketing/watch-video/WYNI ... going after a guy in cave, yeh right!
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.