What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
See the new YouTube feature trailer for Dragon Age: Origins view!
youtube.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
672 Comments
- Killer57, on 06/17/2008, -22/+197Look at the elderly couple! Clearly they are out to destroy marriage.
- Imnick, on 06/17/2008, -32/+182Bout time... gay or straight people are people.
- SeaweedWater, on 06/17/2008, -24/+141how gay.
- RudeTurnip, on 06/17/2008, -34/+133Digg for the freedom to marry!
- diggydougie, on 06/17/2008, -8/+94Why do people need the government's permission to get together? I say that the whole "licensing" process should be abolished.
- inactive, on 06/17/2008, -30/+110Good picture, lets those bible belt ***** know that the gay community isn't represented by men in black leather and chains running around having sex in public.
- inactive, on 06/17/2008, -21/+98Really? The Earth didn't spin off it's orbit into Hell like conservatives said it would?
- TrevorBelmont, on 06/17/2008, -10/+83Keep your *****' government outta my *****' love life!
- Digger1218, on 06/17/2008, -4/+70Against Gay Marriage? Good! Don't get one.
end of story. - inactive, on 06/17/2008, -17/+80I believe this issue is as important as civil rights back in the 60s.
- mrsteveman1, on 06/17/2008, -1/+62Clearly if we allow them to get married, straight people everywhere will be expected to take it up the ass.
- ProjectGSX, on 06/17/2008, -4/+59Which is why we separate church and state.
- cli006, on 06/17/2008, -12/+63Good for them, they have every right to be miserable like the rest of us.
- jgasm, on 06/17/2008, -7/+57why is it whenver the idea of same sex marriage comes up someone has to immediately talk about marrying a chicken or a goat.
(or a rabbit)
and these people think these same sex marriage couples are weird..... - itsme92, on 06/17/2008, -8/+56FTA: "Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said California's policy 'threatens to undo thousands of years of natural marriage'. He predicted 'months of social chaos that could wreak havoc on every state in America.'"
I don't know whether to laugh or to cry - forgiste, on 06/17/2008, -14/+62Why would they want to go and do a thing like that? Marriage ruins a relationship.
- HyperionHK, on 06/17/2008, -4/+52How will it be any different than straight couple divorces? Or right, it wouldn't be.....
- hokie47, on 06/17/2008, -12/+59The difference is that the two are consenting adults with freedom of choice. And ***** the 63% whom would rather embrace hate over love.
- sweetweb, on 06/17/2008, -8/+52Great! Now me and Kate Beckinsale can get hitched!
- gsadamb, on 06/17/2008, -5/+49YES, HOW DARE WE ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE HAPPY?
- DreKor, on 06/17/2008, -9/+51That's what happens when you pass unconstitutional laws; they get struck down.
- stonebear, on 06/17/2008, -4/+46Not that there's anything wrong with that.
- nick1971, on 06/17/2008, -4/+45Not only is the answer bigoted its also wrong.
Go into the bible my friend and you won't find anything except love therein. If you start quoting the old testament as a backup to your ill informed comment then you need to support all of it.
So a friend of mine can sell his daughter
Exodus 21:7
"When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go free as male slaves do."
Colleagues of yours who work on the Sabbath are also dammed
Exodus 35:2
"On six days work may be done, but the seventh day shall be sacred to you as the sabbath of complete rest to the LORD. Anyone who does work on that day shall be put to death."
American football teams are pretty screwed
Leviticus 11
and the pig, which does indeed have hoofs and is cloven-footed, but does not chew the cud and is therefore unclean for you.
Their flesh you shall not eat, and their dead bodies you shall not touch; they are unclean for you."
Watch what you eat
Do not eat fat of ox, sheep or goats (Lev. 7.23)
Do not eat rabbit (Lev. 11:6)
Do not eat blood of fish, fowl or beast (Lev. 7:26)
Do not eat ham, bacon, pork chops or ribs (Lev. 11:7)
Do not eat lobster, crab, scallops or shrimp (Lev. 11:10 and Deut. 14:19)
Get my point. If any thing is a sin accoring to the bible is your attitude. Let he without sin cast the 1st stone.
and so on ... - KaiUno, on 06/17/2008, -7/+47If only the same were true for being a trolling biggot.
- inactive, on 06/17/2008, -6/+46based on divorce rates, the couples will reverse their own marriages.
- mtwoar, on 06/17/2008, -6/+42How about a law stating a human can only marry a human? Would that cure your disgust?
- omegared, on 06/17/2008, -3/+38your right, in Canada we have people marrying pets, rocks all the time. What the ***** as happened, people thinking they should be treated as equals. it always the same old story when blacks and women wanted equal rights they were ridiculed and people were saying it was crazy and it would lead to the end of a MORAL society.
- geniusj, on 06/17/2008, -11/+46The will of the people is irrelevant. Judgments are supposed to be made based on law as it stands at a point in time.
I'm all for (and this country was founded on) the pursuit of happiness as long as it's not directly hurting others. - dygel, on 06/17/2008, -2/+36Oh, I dunno... Visitation rights, inheritance, legal custody of personal property and dependents, insurance benefits, pensions...
- Baldar, on 06/17/2008, -2/+36Agree.. I think..
I think that marriage should be left to the church, that it's a religious institution. HOWEVER, I also believe in the seperation of church and state, and that the state should not be basing their laws off of a religious institution. Nor should companies (insurance companies, I'm looking at you). The government also should not tell churches how they should/should not marry homosexuals either.
Who the hell cares if the second adult on an insurance policy is a spouse, gay lover, platonic roommate just trying to make ends meet, etc? It's my fricking benefit, let me give it to whom I want.
Same goes for all other state and corporate benefits. Let people give THEIR OWN property to whomever they want, and let the church marry whom they see fit.
Only when we realize the government does not own our stuff, and we can give it to whomever we want, will this problem be solved. - endustry, on 06/17/2008, -3/+37Yes, how exactly do you split a Miniature Pinscher 50/50?
- inactive, on 06/17/2008, -5/+38Really? I suppose you want to take away their voting rights, too? The world would never get a chance for positive change if it was up to ignorant, prejudice fools such as yourself.
- ProjectGSX, on 06/17/2008, -7/+39The "will of the people" as you put it was unconstitutional. Bravo to the judges for upholding the constitution.
- DreKor, on 06/17/2008, -3/+35Unless you're in California, then it's not. Rejecting reality doesn't change it.
- inactive, on 06/17/2008, -11/+42Who's that? The intolerant Christians?
- gsadamb, on 06/17/2008, -1/+32Go back to civics class and read about the Judicial branch of government.
- SeaweedWater, on 06/17/2008, -14/+44First Digg thumbnail to almost make me cry. This is a humongous step in the right direction for this country.
- kiwiboyus, on 06/17/2008, -2/+32And as long as you don't breed we'll all be happy.
- mrsteveman1, on 06/17/2008, -6/+36I'm starting a new religion right now, its called Diggism. In Diggism, being a ***** moron troll is a sin.
So there we have it, 2 ***** religions proclaiming arbitrary things to be sins.
Diggism has as much legitimacy in declaring things to be immoral as you do. - mlrigsby, on 06/17/2008, -12/+422004 seems like so long ago. It's good to see that progress is marching on as the bigots watch history pass them by.
- dygel, on 06/17/2008, -2/+32Yes, because I'm sure it would be TOTALLY DIFFERENT from heterosexual divorces. Yep. Completely and utterly not the same. I mean, all legal precedents would certainly have to be thrown out! Lawyers will definitely be clueless on how to proceeed, utterly unable to apply their experience from the 50% of married heterosexuals that get divorced.
- TrevorBelmont, on 06/17/2008, -4/+34F' your "slippery slope" nonsense.
"But what if snakes want to marry shopping carts?!?" - suttercain, on 06/17/2008, -2/+32Most of the Southern states in 1860 wanted to keep slavery legal. Sometimes, just sometimes, the majority is wrong. Really really wrong.
- bjs3171, on 06/17/2008, -4/+33Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said California's policy "threatens to undo thousands of years of natural marriage"
Natural Marriage?? What's that, like, when two people are just married without even trying? That doesn't sound good at all.
And on another note, Ellen is dating Portia De Rossi??? Damn.... - plinstrot, on 06/17/2008, -2/+31My mothers got married this morning and I was there as a witness with my brother. They were just going ahead with the marriage as a political statement (they've been together for 24 years and already are domestic partners), but when it came to reading the vows, they both broke down in tears. Even though they didn't think getting married for real would mean much to them, it really is a huge deal to making their union feel complete at last.
- gsadamb, on 06/17/2008, -3/+32Buried for ridiculous and outdated argument.
- nick1971, on 06/17/2008, -0/+28Funny I'm gay and married. I live in Germany.
I have been with my partner for 15 years and we got married 4 years ago in a church.
None of the 120 guests had any problems.
God has not struck me down and none of our friends, colleagues or neighbors have had any problems accepting our relationship.
As the US is the land of the free home of the brave, why are you still trying to find a minority that you can discriminate against. Get with the program. - inactive, on 06/17/2008, -1/+29No it isn't, but stupidity is a shame.
- 7m7uf, on 06/17/2008, -4/+31Because the truth is damaging to their cause. It's better to say something about religion or sex with animals then what it's really about - bigotry.
- founderofpork, on 06/17/2008, -6/+32YAY!
-
Show 51 - 100 of 694 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is