What is Digg?66 Comments
- drgmdp, on 12/12/2008, -0/+44BREAKING NEWS: Countries choose random blogs to inform about world changing events
- alanocu, on 12/11/2008, -1/+35Can Samsonblinded.org provide links to the sources for this information other than its own blog? This reads as political opinion, not world news. I don't care if you're Sampson or Delilah, if all you have to offer is saying that "The US intelligence on nuclear developments is laughable," then the joke is on you.
- TotalHalibut, on 12/12/2008, -0/+24Contrary to the beliefs of some in the Web 2.0 crowd, your own blog is not a credible source for your article.
- HomeGrown, on 12/12/2008, -0/+15the CIA beamed that info directly into the writer's head.
- jessehadden, on 12/12/2008, -0/+8I kinda stopped taking this seriously somewhere in the first paragraph, with the implied assumption that the Iranian government is running the resistance movement in Iraq.
- Phalanxia, on 12/12/2008, -0/+8"Why Samson Blinded? Biblical Samson, blinded by the Philistines, killed thousands of them in suicide attack. Israeli nuclear weapons are aptly called the Samson Option.
Obadiah Shoher is a pen name for veteran politician. Obadiah lived in the USSR, and sufficiently hated socialism to emigrate. It was quite a disappointment to find that Israeli socialism is in many respects worse.Obadiah contends that socialism, combined with quasi-liberal leftism - the infamous political correctness - spells Israeli destruction, as it has destroyed other societies before.Shoher despises Israeli ostriches who keep their heads in sand preferring not to see the uncomfortable questions: changing demography of the ostensibly Jewish state, accumulation of nuclear weapons by hostile regimes, radicalization of Islamic societies, and the economic dead end of maintaining Israeli military capability regardless of paper treaties."
Yeah, he's an *****. Buried. - inactive, on 12/12/2008, -0/+8http://i34.tinypic.com/28grygk.jpg
- rexblade, on 12/12/2008, -1/+8Ugh I read quite a few articles on that blog and this is my summary of the blogs author... Blood thirsty Zionist. I bet he would be ecstatic if they started some concentration camps to methodically exterminate Palestinians hampering Israels annexing. Its not an illegal occupation if you feel your morally superior.... If you got your way and Iran was bombed I don't think you would like the result, aside from murdering millions of innocent Arabs and Jews in Iran (not that would bother your conscious from what i can tell), you would show to the world your true face. Sorry but not everyone is blind to Israels actions and what youve been doing. I find it disgusting just as anyone who sees how Israel twists media to make them look like the victim. How are you "victims" driving tanks and firing at civilian crowds while invading their country? Puke..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5863204188 ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-660477589 ... - Phalanxia, on 12/12/2008, -0/+7Edit: Just noticed that this guy probably thinks that the Palestinian suicide bombers should be stopped at all costs, yet he glorifies Samson, for killing thousands of people in a suicide attack.
lol wut - inactive, on 12/12/2008, -1/+8There's no evidence for your assertions. Buried as propaganda drivel.
- JordanTW90, on 12/12/2008, -0/+7Citing your own blog does not make you credible.
- CRCulver, on 12/12/2008, -1/+8Where have I heard of Samson Blinded before? Oh yeah, they were the scumbags who spammed Amazon customers begging them to review their book, and then demanded Amazon remove all but the most effusively positive reviews (and Amazon shamefully complied).
- dilbert, on 12/12/2008, -1/+8They never planned on bombing the nuclear sites in the first place. They'd let Israel do it.
- spaceman84, on 12/12/2008, -3/+9How did some crazy Zionist/Anti-Islamist blog get to the front page? Buried as Retarded.
- mr.hostility, on 12/12/2008, -0/+6"The US Administration sold Israeli security for Iranian help in Iraq."
If that's true, it's about ***** time we thought about ourselves over the Israel. - haiduz, on 12/12/2008, -2/+8This phrase is such *****:
" allowed the US Administration a tactical PR victory of reduced casualties in Iraq."
How can someone reduce something as significant as 'reduced casualties in Iraq' to 'a tactical PR victory'?
Just because this person sees efforts to get less poeple killed as 'tactical PR', makes him immediately lose all credibility. Buried as inaccurate. - inactive, on 12/12/2008, -1/+6Yes.... Because a Bush guarantee really means something....
"We're going to have a humble foreign policy".... lol - pimpofpixels, on 12/12/2008, -1/+6I'll wait and see on this one. I can't believe that Bush would ever guarantee to not bomb anything.
- jessehadden, on 12/12/2008, -1/+6It sounds like you've been watching too much Fox News.
Out of curiousity, do you know *why* Iran is not a democracy today? (Hint: this would have something to do with why many ordinary everyday citizens of Iran hate America.) - Mujokan, on 12/12/2008, -1/+5Read up on the difference between Shia and Sunni since you don't know what you're talking about.
- vardis, on 12/12/2008, -0/+4If Bush told me it was Friday, I'd check with someone.
- rexblade, on 12/12/2008, -0/+4How many insurgents are using American weapons (I bet it is allot more then the ones using Iranian weapons)? Does that mean America is deliberately funding insurgents as well? And actually we are deliberately arming the militias/death squads to terrorize their own territory. But none of those people hate Americans or would use those weapons against troops....
- rexblade, on 12/13/2008, -0/+3This thing made it to the front page at a mere 185 diggs last night.... Its total Zionist propaganda. Yet this submission http://digg.com/politics/PAY_ATTENTION_14 has not, with more diggs. Gotta love bury trolls. Evil propaganda gets front page while honest commentary gets buried. I believe this sorta compromises diggs integrity or at least the integrity of the digg community.
- j.carcinogen, on 12/12/2008, -0/+3Yeah the US may not but Israel, perhaps.
- DonJuanAussi, on 12/12/2008, -1/+4Oh God... I thought that I was numb to "Americanisms"... winded is not a word. The past tense of wind is wound.
- Chjoma10, on 12/12/2008, -1/+4So? Bush's guarantees don't mean *****.... is this not clear yet?
- rexblade, on 12/12/2008, -0/+3I would also like to add that Iran is a fairly modern society with communities and thousands of years of culture. The people of Iran want peace more then war just like the Palestinians. How would you like it if another country was constantly looking for an excuse to bomb you? Israel hates the fact Iran feels Palestinians deserve to keep their land and be treated democratically equal. They do not have nukes nor are they trying to build one. If youd like to know who the war monger in the middle east is "innocent" Israel is far more aggressive then Iran has ever been in the last 300 years.
- rrife, on 12/12/2008, -0/+3This sounds like the proof we need to attack Iran....if they claim they'll reduce attacks on American assets, then there is a sharp reduction, then that should be sufficient proof that they were doing it.
- Barackalypse, on 12/12/2008, -0/+3Wait, wasn't that what you wanted, us to negotiate with Iran just like Obama was planning to do?
- Tankslap, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2Mmmmkay.
- scyphozoa, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2yup that sounds like presidential negotiating to me
- dilettante, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2"Opinion" is a polite word for it. More like paranoid-delusional rambling...
In other news, the birthmark on Gorbachev's head is the sign of the beast, and the world government he's running with funds that he skims from his drug deals is coming to take away your DRM-free music. Really. I just said so, didn't I? - OldDrtySapper, on 12/13/2008, -0/+2lol but Israel on the other hand will bomb the ***** out of them.
- inactive, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2The past tense of 'wind' is 'wound'. Article is also *****.
- bshock, on 12/12/2008, -1/+3Ever notice how Dubya always comes out in support of something right before he ***** it blind?
- inactive, on 12/12/2008, -1/+3lol believe a word Bush says...
- 9bpm9, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2Who in gods name would bomb a nuclear facility...........
- eredeath, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2blog = crap news
- s0lace, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2Yeah, we'll just let Israel do it.
- TurnipFarm, on 12/12/2008, -0/+2This is garbage! It's just some wacko's guess, it's based on nooothingggg notthinggg nothingness (nothing-face).
- khoa1708, on 12/12/2008, -1/+3we won't bomb your nuclear sites but we'll bomb everything else
- inactive, on 12/14/2008, -0/+1Lemmings.
This is just the setup. What happens if Iran changes it's stance just slightly? Ideally before Jan 20. - sanman, on 12/12/2008, -1/+2b-b-but Libs told me that it's wrong to bomb Iran
just like they declared Bush Sr a coward for not invading Iraq back in 1991
so should I now reverse my position and start hollering at Bush for not bombing Iran -- we all know the Libs will make an election issue out of it - Jenardo, on 12/12/2008, -1/+2We're not going to bomb Iran.
http://www.slate.com/id/2179084/ - jsmith39, on 12/12/2008, -1/+2*****, even if everything he said it true..
I love his final statement: The US Administration sold Israeli security for Iranian help in Iraq.
Imagine that.. the US put US needs ahead of Israel's. Bastards... - RogueGenius, on 12/13/2008, -0/+1Well, I'm sure they are all sleeping better now. I mean if you can't trust Bush...
- roccanet, on 02/11/2009, -0/+1just ran across this..... and it sounds very plausible.
its unfortunate that iran basically completely admitted it had a bomb whilst shouting "death to america" at their 30 year revolution events. my guess is that israel will drop a nuke on them before they allow iran to have the bomb. Apparently the IDF doesnt have enough firepower to take out the facilities and the US would have done it under bush if they were going to do it. This is shaping up to be one hell of a year... - Jicima, on 12/12/2008, -1/+2neither do Obamawaffles...that bitch isn't even in office yet and he has screwed us on immediate withdrawl from Iraq, repealing the Bush tax cuts, and green energy. This election has shown me they are all the same. They will say whatever they think we want to hear and do whatever bennefits them and their friends who put them there. Money and Greed and screw humanity.
- noahhoward, on 12/12/2008, -0/+1"The US Administration waited with fulfilling its part of the game "
... so do any of you guys remember us bombing Iran's nuclear sites? Cuz, I don't remember and I'm pretty sure that if we didn't... we kept our end of the deal. -
Show 51 - 66 of 66 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 