Sponsored by wix.com
65 Comments
- loganhid, on 10/11/2007, -6/+24Blair is America's little bitch
- brianbb98, on 10/11/2007, -2/+16No, there is not.
And Bush knew that there would be no "post war" from the beginning...
The war on terror isnt about winning, thats impossible anyway... its about making us give up our freedoms.
Just wait, within the next year there will be another U.S. attack... :*( - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -9/+20Why the ***** would British people support Ron Paul? Get a grip and stop spamming digg with your totally irrelevant comments.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -4/+15Wesley Clark – the neocon war agenda – five years, seven countries:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8aOiMmekGk - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -10/+20America is Israel's little bitch.
- ZWarren69, on 10/11/2007, -8/+17He made a really long intro.
Part One is about religion and their undeniable similarities.
Part Two is about 9/11.
Part Three is about Central Banking and its role throughout history.
I understand being skeptical, but that film is based in facts.... like it or not. - ZWarren69, on 10/11/2007, -9/+17Easy to say when you have not even watched it....
- OBKenobi, on 10/11/2007, -0/+8That's no excuse.
- ZWarren69, on 10/11/2007, -6/+13Spk is right! Blair is essentially a neocon, and has even called himself one.
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Zeitgeist_The_Movie - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -3/+9Blair the neo-conservative?
Tony Blair is "a neo-conservative", according to some of the most hawkish thinkers in the US.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/3033913.stm - Sp1k3, on 10/11/2007, -14/+20It can all be explained, why they lie to us that is.
http://digg.com/world_news/Zeitgeist_The_Most_Important_Movie_of_All_Time - Bogie22, on 10/11/2007, -0/+6You're living in a dream world if you think any candidates would put America first. They put themselves first. For one thing America is a hugely divided place. The media and pseudo media feeds on this and even encourages it because fierce loyalty and the perception of fighting for or against a cause creates loyalty in viewers, listeners and readers. The comical thing is seeing just how influenced people actually are by these perversions of the truth. The intellectual integrity of the modern era is appalling.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -13/+18The Middle East conflict is a perpetual war, and it started long before 2003. It is a war of imperial occupation and control, and there is no exit-strategy and no post-war plan. There has never been any intention of leaving.
If you want the war to end, support Ron Paul. - Gir9000, on 10/11/2007, -2/+7This is very interesting.. Blair screws up big time by listening to bushes lies so he quits (not a dumb move). Bush lies directly to the American people everyday. can we quit on bush?... it bet its called impeachment!
- Bogie22, on 10/11/2007, -3/+7Given that an election is not far off, do you really think violence would improve anything? And for the record, the America I want is a place of decency and regard for others. Not a place where yellow journalism and bloggers posing as legitimate sources of news pit the populace against one another and seek to divide.
- kenvsryu, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5When will Bush find out?
- jellygraph, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5I'm not surprised, but what the heck... this is what we get when we elect paranoid schizophrenics, who rationalize in double think and speak in newspeak... say one thing (everyone claps), and then do another (everyone shrugs and carries on with their day)...
I guess this is what happens when there is _no accountability_ for our leaders. We are just pawns to them. I mean, what are we going to do about it when they lie? Roll over... yet again. No accountability. - wonderchemist, on 10/11/2007, -5/+8We had a plan, it just didn't work... recall:
The Plan Was: Be greeted as liberators, find the WMDS, setup a new Iraqi government and leave. - tybris, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3A little lesson from history: Never invade Russia.
- CptBuck, on 10/11/2007, -1/+4Yeah, Russia has nuclear weapons and hates our policies too and we arent invading them...its clearly cause the CIA backs PUTIN!!!
- Bogie22, on 10/11/2007, -6/+9So in other words you want to bring about change in the exact same way as you're complaining about the US bringing about change in the middle east?
- Derrekito, on 10/11/2007, -1/+4Bush was actually very forthcoming on the postwar plan: "Stay the course". This was said after his speech on the carrier, right (mission accomplished)?
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -5/+8@neiltc13
Please tell me, how do you think our involvement in Middle East conflicts is going to come to an end? - dagamer34, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5No one wants to impeach Bush because Cheney is worse. I don't think we can do a fell-sweep of the entire administration like the Brits can without taking up too much time. It'll be election time by the time it'll all be over.
- CptBuck, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5damn you fascist USA! you've got him pegged! He's a wealthy freemason jew congressman! Now that his jew disguise is exposed we must throw salt at him so that he will melt before our us and the revolution may continue.
- motters, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2This sounds like a rather feeble attempt to try to salvage some of Blair's reputation, making out that he was somehow the helpless victim of an over-zealous US administration. Frankly I don't buy it. If he did have serious reservations, he should have raised them publicly or joined other European leaders in refusing to get involved with something of questionable legality which was obviously going to turn into a foreign policy disaster.
- cha0sFB, on 10/11/2007, -2/+4Whenever anyone uses the word "liberal", they're automatically a bigoted moron in my book =)
- KegBol, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2What a depressing comment thread this is. Has no one got anything nice to say? Then don't say nuttin' at all.
Seriously, most people commenting seem about as politically savvy as a coconut. - PatriotOne, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Of course Bush and Cheney had a post war plan. The plan is to prolong the war indefinately so the pillaging of American Taxpayer's dollars and the war profiteering (weapon sales, reconstruction, etc., etc., etc.) and oil claims can go on as long as possible. Get a clue people.....they are working very hard to NOT end the war...not win the war.
These people are evil.....not stupid! Were the ones that are stupid for believing them in the first place. Now would be a good time for everyone to wake up....k? - fuzzmeister, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Arguing that Israel is fascist seems like quite a stretch, but I'd be willing to listen to it. However, how in the world did you decide that all Jews are fascists? Have you ever met a Jewish person in real life? I was not calling you antisemitic for criticizing the media, which you seem very against, but for calling all Jews fascists, which is obvious antisemitism to me.
- labmouse42, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Come on people! There's a war at stake here! Terrorists! 9/11! They hate our freedoms!
How could people as the US leaders to bother with military plans?!?! - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -2/+4I think this was/is the plan:
The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
by Zbigniew Brzezinski
http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/perseus/book_detail.jsp?isbn=0465027261 - bshock, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2There's no question that Tony Blair deserves to be tried in the same war crimes tribunal as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1This isn't new.
It's even in the leaked "downing street memo" and other documents written _before_ the war and leaked in 2005 that the british government not only knew that the evidence "was being fixed" to support a war against Iraq, but that the British were concerned that there was no plan for what would happen once Saddam was gone.
Were the Downing Street Memo and other leaked documents not widely covered in the US? They're quite well known in Europe. - ZWarren69, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. =)
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4Tony Blair is a wanker.
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Tybris is actually right - that WAS the plan. It was based on the inflated estimates of popular support fed to the Bush administration by iraqi dissidents, notably an iraqi con-man under the pseudonym 'Curveball'. The CIA doubted Curveballs intel, actually he'd even been questioned by mainstream media, but since it fit the administrations intentions they uncritically accepted all he said at face value.
- crazybugger, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@wonderchemist
This was the real plan:
Be greeted as Looters, What WMDs?, setup a *cough* Bush *cough* government and build a $500 million embassy. Sorry, I mean fort - Trutholder, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4Guys, is anyone surprised anymore about the news if you can really call it that. or the revelations that are coming out concerning the IRAQ war.?
This was the plan, Their was never an exit strategy. The idea was we would set up a Iraqi puppet government that would do whatever we want. Then move on to IRAN then SYRIA. Only problem is the Neocons and the Sleazy Democrats( their the same ***** different color), didn't count on the Iraqi people to actually revolt. (big shocker). anyways Everyone around the world knew this long before we Invaded. And now we will go to war with IRAN.
This is how its going to happen, Either their will be a US base struck and it will be Blamed on IRAN or another "terrorist" attack will happen in the US. This i see happening very soon. And it will be blamed on IRAN. Just like 9/11 Was first blamed on OSAMA then IRAQ. and people just accepted it.
THIS has nothing to do with IRAN getting nuclear weapons. i mean come on PAKISTAN has Nuclear weapons and its population hates American policies. But Pakistan oppresses its people and its government is Supported and Financed by the CIA, US.
Things in this country will never change unless we as a people educate our-self, and that means u actually read more then one book and stop watching TV. - Groovemaster, on 10/11/2007, -5/+6@Bogie22
I don't personally advocate violent revolution, but fascistusa1's plan would involve using violence to IMPROVE the situation, rather than ***** things up even more, which is what the current administration is doing in the middle east. - tybris, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2There was a post-war plan. It was to have the troops get hailed in like heroes by the Iraqi people like they were the first time. The enthusiasm of liberation would quickly stabilize the political climate and Bush would be an undisputed, popular world leader with a honorable place in the history books.
It just turned out the plan was useless. - Theodorant, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3Blair even knew that Bush was fixing evidence for the war in Iraq so the public would agree to it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo - Groovemaster, on 10/11/2007, -12/+13"Much of the presented material with respect to 9/11 is still debatable."
Everything is debatable, because there will always be people who can't face up to what's blatantly obvious to those of us who base our worldview around facts rather than convenience or comfort.
The official story of what happened on 9/11 was a clumsily developed sham, and all the evidence points directly towards the event being choreographed by elements of the US government to enable highly profitable, unending war in the middle east, as per the PNAC manifesto. - TheAnomaly, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2I thought EVERYONE knew Bush had no post-war plan...
- metamorfoza, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2obligatory..
your moma is my..... - tybris, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1"Pakistan oppresses its people and its government is Supported and Financed by the CIA, US."
Iran and Iraq were once heavily supported by the US as well. To keep your weapon industry up and running you need to have power hungry friends and make enemies every once in a while. - BlackAle, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2Blair is nearly as incompetent as Bush, so I'm not surprised.
- PsychoticClown, on 10/11/2007, -3/+3- Guys who are into S&M.
- Guys who are into bondage & domination.
- Guys who are into spanking.
Those are just some contenders. In the end, Blair is the one who truly shines at genuinely enjoying being someone's bitch. You can try to compete with him, but we know it's a lost battle. - Groovemaster, on 10/11/2007, -4/+4I said that the plan involved improving America. I didn't say whether I thought it would succeed or not.
Don't put words into my mouth.
As for a "revolution of the ballot box", don't make me laugh. Have you seen the Israel-pandering candidates the mainstream media has lined up for 2008? We need candidates who put America first, and there aren't any (except Ron Paul, who the MSM are ensuring doesn't stand a chance). - annaponda, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1A bit late now Blair!
You could've made your concerns real and loud by publicly denouncing this war before it started! It would've made a real difference then... but now you're sniveling, groveling for the public forgiveness.
It's not going to work, you're guilty as charged, the writings on the wall and it's dripping with the blood of Innocent Iraqis! -
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions



What is Digg?