What is Digg?Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate
Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate.96 Comments
- ANonHubbard, on 04/12/2008, -0/+26The "The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate" is inaccurate.
- daEvan, on 04/12/2008, -0/+24Epic win
- londonroad, on 04/12/2008, -0/+23I hope the UK police follow. The cult is growing at an alarming rate
- eibmozhsawniarb, on 04/12/2008, -0/+18The "The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate" is inaccurate. Because the article is accurate.
- DragonFire1024, on 04/12/2008, -0/+18Google News removed the two stories quoting Wikinews. They did it one at a time. This is all that is left now. Digg it until it can't be dugg no more. Both sources are listed in Google News and both stories were there...not no more. CENSORSHIP SUCKS
- no12u, on 04/12/2008, -0/+18This is great news! and I hope other governments will follow suit. Why should the Co$ care if they have nothing to hide...
What are your crimes, Scientology? - Drkgodess, on 04/12/2008, -0/+18It's about time.
- ANonHubbard, on 04/12/2008, -0/+17It'd be interesting to see if they seized any memos about handling anonymous protestors...
- cthon98, on 04/12/2008, -0/+16This is the sort of action we need to start bringing an end to this dangerous cult.
- Poetheunclothed, on 04/12/2008, -0/+16"The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate"
I'd love to see some comments from the people claiming this, what do you think? - DragonFire1024, on 04/12/2008, -0/+15Scientology buried it...I donno who else would. We need to spread this news of both the raid and censorship.
- FreddyO, on 04/12/2008, -0/+15The Belgian authorities have acted to protect their citizens from the dangerous cult of Scientology and I applaud them. I also highly recommend Belgian chocolate.
- AnonX77, on 04/12/2008, -0/+14The 1st of many to come. Brace yourself Miscavige. Partyvan on the ***** way.
Belgium own them bitches - sargo, on 04/12/2008, -1/+15ANONYMOUS DELIVERS/belguim govertment^_^
- deanoplex, on 04/12/2008, -0/+14This is good news but I worry for the prosecutors safety (fair-game). Anonymous must muster a synchronized series of of lawsuits worldwide to overwhelm Scientologys' ability to fight back.
- houstonrally, on 04/12/2008, -0/+14Scientology's scam is done.
- HeroofTime55, on 04/12/2008, -0/+13Awesome!
- clamxbaker, on 04/12/2008, -0/+13Actually it does affect you because the Church of Scientology is using our tax dollars to subsidize their corporation. Not only that but this secretive organization has their own self serving agendas. Their agendas are not compatible with our western democracy's. Scientology is a litigious and vengeful group, and they do not teach many socially redeeming values. Scientology stands for money, corruption, and silencing their victims, and their critics. Scientology's attempts to censor critics on the Internet is what go them into the mess in the first place. This started along time before the leaked Tom Cruise video, Scientology's latests attempts to silence their critics created enough outrage for a lot of people to finally say enough is enough.
Anonymous isn't protesting what Scientologist believe anyway, they're protesting the abusive secretive policies, and practices of the Church of Scientology. Furthermore Scientology is not a religion it's a self help pyramid scheme that siphons it's members bank accounts dry and seperates families. They've hurt many people all in the name of making a buck.
Just because there are other problems in the world doesn't mean that this corrupt cult should just get a pass. Anonymous is helping to make a difference by exposing the criminal behavior of the CoS. I'll continue to do whatever I can to help the cause because it's just too frustrating to watch that evil organization trample on good people and ruin their lives just so some greedy bastards can get rich off an phony religion scheme. - fivo7, on 04/13/2008, -0/+12"Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate" = CRAP - if you don't like doesn't mean
inaccurate, they to the same line in everything.....
INACCURATE THIS - BELGIUM TV
http://youtube.com/watch?v=aBK7zZabfTA&feature=rel ...
and
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http ...
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http ...
http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?option=com_c ...
http://www.flandersnews.be/cm/de.redactie.english/ ...
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http ... - Tanker940, on 04/12/2008, -0/+12So it starts...
- no12u, on 04/12/2008, -0/+12clamxbaker is exactly right
spenderaka is totally missing the point of the movement against Scientology.
spenderaka is also in all likelihood a Co$ troll - fivo7, on 04/12/2008, -0/+12religions don't get raided,and don't hang around courtrooms, pi's or lawyer,they preach faith
- MudNon, on 04/12/2008, -0/+11You think that's bad? Apparently Amazon has been systematically removing negative review's of Hubbard's books.
- D14852001neko, on 04/12/2008, -0/+11Why hasn't this reached the frontpage? More so, why its not even on the Upcoming list? This is serious business!
- Icouldbe, on 04/12/2008, -0/+11Note how really no one other than its members believe that it's a legit religion, or that it isn't a cult. Meaning it's ability to actually influence the general public is close to nil. So the more action is taken against them, the more it emboldens others to do the same. Way to go Belgium for doing what the US is too cowardly to do.
- Anonakitty, on 04/12/2008, -0/+10Great news.
- DragonFire1024, on 04/12/2008, -1/+10I have e-mailed Digg and asked for an explanation as to the inaccuracy tag. Wikinews has the right to know how that tag got added. This is unfair to all journalists who write great reports.
- cameronthirteen, on 04/13/2008, -0/+9"Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate."
Those people would be disgruntled Scilons, of course.
Their time is about up, as is their game. Thank you, Belgium. - wintersland, on 04/13/2008, -0/+8Doesn't look very innacurate to me:
http://www.flandersnews.be/cm/de.redactie.english/ ... - grinningsadist, on 04/12/2008, -0/+8Excellent news, here's hoping it paves the way a little more for DM to get v& and c&.
- wageslaven, on 04/12/2008, -2/+10Yeah, why the hell is that there?
- HeroofTime55, on 04/12/2008, -0/+7Because Scilons mass flagged it as "misleading" as they do with every single other pro-anon link. Obviously, information is a threat to them.
It's unfortunate that Digg has no way to reverse such mass attacks. with an equal show of force. Perhaps a mass complaint mailing to those in charge of Digg is in order. - Deltanonymous, on 04/12/2008, -0/+7The only thing inaccurate about this digg is the misleading announcement of it being inaccurate.
Better yet, if people REALLY think this is "inaccurate", why not look it up themselves? - anonFTLD, on 04/12/2008, -1/+8CENSORSHIP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I DECLARE SHENANIGANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE HAVE A CENSORSHIP ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!
MAN THE HARPOONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - picaflor999, on 04/12/2008, -0/+7No more luxury Caribbean cruises for that enema-addicted, bow-tie-wearing midget fondly known by Scilons as "Mr. David Miscavige."
- no12u, on 04/13/2008, -0/+6I've really REALLY had it with this "inaccuracy" crap from Digg. WTF! Seriously, how do we complain? What about this story is inaccurate? It's a link to an actual new report! They should have to explain why this has been tagged liked this. Serious BS
- banchukita, on 04/13/2008, -0/+6Inaccuracies, but no comments explaining exactly which parts are inaccurate?
Who's trying to censor here? Hmmmm... - ThePirateParty, on 04/13/2008, -0/+6Awesome.
- DragonFire1024, on 04/12/2008, -0/+6Scientology buried it. Guess the truth hurts.
- DragonFire1024, on 04/13/2008, -0/+6They say the readers did it by burying the story. I wrote to Digg along with several editors from Wikinews and that's what they said and have not replied further. There are only two things we can do: e-mail digg with complaints or to digg this article through the roof. I will let others decide what they want to .........do..........
- AnonBuffalo, on 04/13/2008, -0/+5don;t kid yourself. the cult is shrinking. they want to appear to be growing, but membership is down.
- JasonMath, on 04/13/2008, -0/+5Yeah, seriously:
# of 5-star reviews: 218
# of 4-star reviews: 18
# of 3-star reviews: 6
# of 2-star reviews: 2
# of 1-star reviews: 0
WTF? - fivo7, on 04/13/2008, -0/+4also may be paying off google as its harder to find,they will soon be paying off everyone,costing them bucket loads
- ExFilms, on 04/14/2008, -0/+4Digg digg digg... don't let Co$ sweep this one under the carpet!
- desertrain7, on 04/13/2008, -0/+4It's accurate
http://www.mister-info.com/?cmd=displaystory&story ... - rednec0, on 04/13/2008, -0/+4accurate article is accurate
- Jenkem, on 04/13/2008, -0/+3Brilliant news. I wonder if the Germans will allow the Belgians first blood?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7133867.stm
I'm betting the EU will act en masse when the first member nation issues a permaban.
And let's not forget Mother Russia's similar WIN of a month ago:
http://forums.enturbulation.org/36642-post1/ - wageslaven, on 04/12/2008, -1/+4The "marks" (or victims) of this predatory scam think it's a religion.
- Devilboy666, on 04/14/2008, -0/+3Everyone please email Digg. We need to be able to see who buries articles, just like we can see who diggs them. This is crap.
- Devilboy666, on 04/14/2008, -0/+3Can we PLEASE see who's marking this article as inaccurate?
-
Show 51 - 94 of 94 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is