What is Digg?6 Comments
- foopirata, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2"National Prayer Network" ? http://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/three.html debunks it through and true. The "citations" are wrong, in index and in interpretation.
"An educational forum for the examination of religious truth and religious tolerance" ??? Yeah, probably examining it so they can ignore it completely.
Even of that were true, and all these ***** interpretations were true - do you see anyone living by the letter of these comments (cause the Talmud is only a commentary, nothing else)?
I think you need to let go of these sites of yours. They're poisoning you.
Instead, go to a sinagogue on a friday night. Hear what the rabbi has to say in his sermon. Let's see how surprised you'll be. - foopirata, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3I think you need to reach for the med bottle. Take some pills. See your doctor. You might eventually feel better.
- jimmyzilch, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Yeah, how clever. Everyone - just listen to this commenter - don't take 30 seconds to look at these sites:
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=74077&sid=00edd184c48d53cb62a986eac64ca8f3
or Google "Talmud Pedophilia" --- or better yet, go get the book from the library! Are you people that stupid?
I honestly don't believe you are that stupid and pathetic. I fully believe you are intelligent enough to go to your local library and reserve a copy of the "Talmud" and the "Mishna".
So much is riding on this.
Here is a video where the presenter goes to a Rabbinical library, and shows you the texts, right off the shelf:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584
This is not subjective. You do not create reality, and simply saying "it's all lies, you're a kook" does nothing to change the objective facts of reality. It's time to act like adults. - jimmyzilch, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1foopirata, you must be centcom, because you are everywhere, telling the same silly jokes. It's sad if you actually do believe what you say, because you are so haughty - this is pitiful, as you are objectively wrong. Every time I have seen anyone try to have these discussions, you show up, you are proved wrong, and then you refuse to respond. This is pathetic and childish, and I fail to see how you are not overwhelmed with personal shame.
You are a troll. You have no argument. You talk about tin foil hats and pills - the same run-on jokes, that in your severely underdeveloped mind, may someday be funny if they are said enough times. This failed humor is to play the stand-in for the presentation of facts and intellectual concepts? How do you live with yourself, knowing that everything you say is a lie? How do you convince yourself you have worth without simple integrity?
I am very, very sorry for you.
Here, again, are all the Talmudic quotes condoning child-sex. Anyone can go get the book from the library and look it up.
MISHNAH. A GIRL OF THE AGE OF THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY MAY BE BETROTHED BY INTERCOURSE; … IF SHE WAS MARRIED TO A PRIEST, SHE MAY EAT TERUMAH.
— Babylonian Talmud Tractate Niddah 44b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 308
GEMARA. … R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 55b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 376
GEMARA. … It is related of Justinia the daughter of 'Aseverus son of Antonius that she once appeared before Rabbi. 'Master', she said to him, 'at what age may a woman marry?'. 'At the age of three years and one day', he told her. 'And at what age is she capable of conception?' 'At the age of twelve years and one day', he replied. 'I', she said to him, 'married at the age of six and bore a child at the age of seven; alas for the three years that I have lost at my father's house'. But can a woman conceive at the age of six years?
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 45a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 310
GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. (1) When I said it before Samuel he said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to (2) flesh. Some teach this teaching by itself: (3) [As to] a small boy who has intercourse with a grown-up woman, Rab said, he makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said: 'Injured by a piece of wood' does not apply to flesh. R. Oshaia objected: WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN HAS HAD INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR WHEN A GIRL WAS ACCIDENTALLY INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]; SO ACCORDING TO R. MEIR. BUT THE SAGES SAY: A GIRL WHO WAS INJURED ACCIDENTALLY BY A PIECE OF WOOD — HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH! (4) Raba said, It means (5) this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, (6) it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; (7) but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood,' and [with regard to the case of] 'a girl injured by a piece of wood,' itself, there is the difference of opinion between R. Meir and the Sages.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 57-58
GEMARA. … Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that. (2) What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. (3) But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman. (4)
It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; [55a] [he] who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally; or a woman who causes herself to be bestially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment. (5)
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54b - 55a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 371
GEMARA. … It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, (2) for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, (3) and Phinehas (4) surely was with them. And the Rabbis? (5) — [These were kept alive] as bondmen and bondwomen. (6) If so, (7) a proselyte whose age is three years and one day (8) should also be permitted! — [The prohibition is to be explained] in accordance with R. Huna. For R. Huna pointed out a contradiction: It is written, Kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him, (9) but if she hath not known, save her alive; from this it may be inferred that children are to be kept alive whether they have known or have not known [a man]; and, on the other hand, it is also written, But all the women children, that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, (3) but do not spare them if they have known. Consequently (10) it must be said that Scripture speaks of one who is fit (11) for cohabitation. (12)
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 60b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 402
GEMARA. … IF ONE WAS YOUNGER THAN THIS AGE, INTERCOURSE WITH HER IS LIKE PUTTING A FINGER IN THE EYE. It was asked, Do the features of virginity disappear and reappear again or is it possible that they cannot be completely destroyed until after the third year of her age? In what practical respect could this matter? — In one, for instance, where her husband had intercourse with her before the age of three and found blood, and when he had intercourse after the age of three he found no blood. If you grant that they disappear and reappear again [it might well be assumed] that there 'was not sufficient time for their reappearance, but if you maintain that they cannot be destroyed until after the age of three years it would be obvious that a stranger cohabited with her. Now what is your decision? — R. Hiyya son of R. Ika demurred: But who can tell us that a wound inflicted within the three years is not healed forthwith, seeing it is possible that it is immediately healed and it would thus be obvious that a stranger had cohabited with her? Rather the practical difference is the case, for instance, where her husband had intercourse with her while she was under three years of age and found blood and when he had intercourse after the age of three he also found blood. If you grant that the features disappear and reappear again the blood might well be treated as that of virginity, but if you maintain that they cannot be destroyed until after the age of three years, that must be the blood of menstruation. Now what is your decision? — R. Hisda replied, Come and hear: IF ONE WAS YOUNGER THAN THIS AGE, INTERCOURSE WITH HER IS LIKE PUTTING A FINGER IN THE EYE; what need was there to state, LIKE PUTTING A FINGER IN THE EYE' instead of merely saying: IF ONE WAS YOUNGER THAN THIS AGE, INTERCOURSE WITH HER IS of no consequence'? Does not this then teach us that as the eye tears and tears again so do the features of virginity disappear and reappear again.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 45a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 309-310
GEMARA. … R. Hisda objected: If a girl, whose period to see [blood] had not arrived yet, got married, Beth Shammai say: One gives her four nights, and the disciples of Hillel say: Until the wound is healed up. (1) If her period to see [blood] had arrived and she married, Beth Shammai say: One gives her the first night, and Beth Hillel say: Until the night following the Sabbath [one gives her] four nights.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 6a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 20-21
This page contains scans of the pages out of the book:
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html - jimmyzilch, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1Also, here's the proof that these texts are still widely believed and followed. Foopirata, I had no desire to publicly humiliate you to such an extreme extent, but you have clearly brought this down upon yourself.
Blogs devoted to exposing Rabbinical sexual abuse (mostly pedophilia):
http://jewishsurvivors.blogspot.com/
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/
http://jewishwhistleblower.blogspot.com/
http://www.lukeford.net/blog/index.php/
http://www.thetruthaboutagudah.com/
Various other sources:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqoGiSi0HUo
http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/zionism/jewish_pedophilia.html
http://www.theawarenesscenter.org/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/06/AR2006090601863.html
http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-news/1516549/posts
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=2555575&page=1
http://www.jewishsf.com/bk961018/1cfirst.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120100898.html
http://www.lukeford.net/blog/?p=313 - jimmyzilch, on 10/11/2007, -6/+1Yeah, talk all you want about Muslims, just shut your whiny-baby lips when people talk about the God-hating Jewish supremacists.
THE TALMUD AND THE MISHRA CONDONE SEX WITH BABIES UNDER THE AGE OF THREE - JUDAISM IS A SATANIC CULT BENT ON WORLD DOMINATION AND THE SUBJUGATION OF ALL PEOPLES. THE JEWS BELIEVE BLACK PEOPLE ARE A CURSED SLAVE RACE - GOOGLE THE 'CURSE OF HAMM'.
THE JEWS SAY IN THEIR HOLIEST BOOK THAT JESUS IS BOILING IN HELL IN A PIT OF SEMEN AND FECES.
COMMUNISM WAS CREATED BY JEWS.
READ, YOU DULL BASTARDS!
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is