We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We are bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous... The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done. And then we will leave — and we will leave behind a free Iraq.
Our mission continues. Al-Qaida is wounded, not destroyed. The scattered cells of the terrorist network still operate in many nations, and we know from daily intelligence that they continue to plot against free people. The proliferation of deadly weapons remains a serious danger. The enemies of freedom are not idle, and neither are we. Our government has taken unprecedented measures to defend the homeland — and we will continue to hunt down the enemy before he can strike.
The war on terror is not over, yet it is not endless. We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide. No act of the terrorists will change our purpose, or weaken our resolve, or alter their fate. Their cause is lost. Free nations will press on to victory.
Vietnam and Iraq = stupid wars fought because of hubris from the ruling elite who have no skin in the game at the expense of our brave and funded by the U.S. taxpayer. Throw the corrupt rascals out of office now! They do not represent America.
Where the ***** is my "buried. propaganda" option... you guys yell at people believing the bush/cheney *****, but you guys are doing the same damn thing...
I'm sorry, but all of these "4000 dead" digg threads are *****, and this is from someone against the war. Why do diggers care about these troops who die in Iraq but care nothing about even tens of thousands of preventable deaths at home? In the past five years many more people have been killed by gun violence in the US than in Iraq, especially in urban communities, but you don't post constant updates of "10,000 killed in Oakland/Compton/Detroit since 2003" each day. And sadly, many of the people being killed in these communities are the same who would join the army. So if they die in Iraq your mourn them, if they die at home you ignore them. These "urban" soldiers actually have a better chance of surviving in Iraq than in their homes. At least in the army they are getting paid and learning discipline.
If you really cared about saving lives you would do more to prevent them. You would join a cause that actually saves lives, rather than leave pointless political comments on digg. You could save thousands of lives just by teaching proper pool safety and lockup to your neighbors (more kids die in pools each year than are killed by guns). And you can still be political in your free time, but at least your "sadness" over 4000 dead Americans will seem genuine.
We get it, you hate Bush and his administration. But stop acting like you care about these 4000 soldiers when you cared nothing about them before they joined the army. Thousands of Americans have died from preventable accidents yet you care nothing about them because you can't blame Bush. You are only latching on to these numbers to further boast about your hatred of him. If you really cared about saving lives, go out and do something about it, THEN come back and boast.
I'd really like to say something original and heart warming and all that... but honestly, I'm pretty sure everyone feels the same way I do. At a loss for words because of the crimes our (United States) country has committed in the name of....(in the name of what exactly?) We went in under false pretenses.... we are occupying a nation that couldn't have harmed us if they tried.
_Percentages by service branch: Army: 72 percent; Marines: 24 percent; Navy: 2 percent; Air Force: 1 percent (Coast Guard had one death.)
_Percentages by service force: Active duty: 83 percent; National Guard: 10 percent; Reserve: 6 percent.
_Percent who died since President George W. Bush declared major combat ended: 97 percent
_Months with the most deaths since the start of the war: November 2004: 137; April 2004: 135; May 2007: 126; December 2006: 112; January 2005: 107
_Iraq provinces with most deaths since the start of war: Baghdad: 1,113; Anbar: 1,099; Salaheddin: 513; Nineveh: 220; Diyala: 136
_Percentage killed by an improvised explosive device: 44 percent in 2007; 56 percent to date in 2008
_Percent of deaths that were non-hostile: 18 percent
_Number who died of illness: 66
_Percent who were officers: 9 percent
_Number older than 45 years: 83
_Number who were age 18: 33
_Number of women: 98
_Percent of the dead who were women: 2 percent
_Percentages by ethnic group: White: 75 percent; Hispanic or Latino: 11 percent; Black or African American: 9 percent; Asian: 2 percent; multiple races, pending, or unknown: 1 percent; American Indian or Alaska Native: 1 percent; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 1 percent
_Number from California, the most of any home state: 429
_Number from Wyoming, least of any home state: 12 (Washington, D.C.: 6 deaths)
_Number from Texas: 371
_Number from New York state: 173
_Number from Puerto Rico: 33
_Percent from the South (region according to US Census Bureau): 36 percent
_Percent from the Northeast: (region according to US Census Bureau): 15 percent
_Highest deaths per capita (based on U.S. Census population estimates): Vermont, 3.22; Nebraska, 2.42, Alaska, 2.34; Montana and Wyoming, 2.30; South Dakota, 2.26
I wish we would make a distinction between asymmetrical warfare and terrorism. It really confuses the word "terrorism" when absolutely every military act taken against the U.S. gets classified as "terrorism". Maybe we could call the guerrilla-type sneak attacks against military targets "terrified-ism" and the attacks on civilian targets could still be called "terrorism". Although I do like "smithereen commandos" too. Has the effect of pulling the rug out posthumously.
If you cannot distinguish between High and Low Intensity Conflicts and thus cannot understand the difference between the two missions than your opinion on the subject is worthless. One mission (the easy one) was complete, the second one is much harder and incomplete. The problem is the that the administration only planned for the first mission and dropped the ball on the follow on mission. Thankfully some smart brass has started to fix the bulk of the problems of the past couple of year (as evidenced by the declining violence and generally better conditions).
Pretty sad that Americans had to die for a an undeclared war. At least it hasn't gotten to the capacity of vietnam. I think it is pretty messed up when there was no defensive measure. 4000 Americans dead, man is that sad. For what? We are 1-3 trillion in debt, 4000 dead, tanking currency, arming militants that we only months before the conflict wanted to defeat. How ass backwards can Americans get.
$2 trillion and so we've only managed to kill off FOUR THOUSAND trailer trash southern bush voters? There MUST be a more cost-effective way of disposing of America's southern poors.
I remember at the beginning of this war they were talking about how there would hardly be any American soldiers killed and how it would only cost 50 billion dollars at the most. I can't believe how wrong they were.
America is NOT at war. The American military is at war. America is at the mall. One percent of the population is in uniform serving in the military. We'll leave footing the bill for this, and the trillion+ dollars not accounted for yet that will go to pay for the Veteran's hospitals, medical care and replenishments of weapons, ammo, ships, tanks, trucks etc destroyed and used... to our kids.
We could decrease the number of deaths if America would get off their high horse and support us. The military has done more with less for the past decade and we are rewarded with less money and less equipment. What a shame!
4,000 doesn't sound like much unless you are one of the people it represents,and lets not forget about the almost 3,000 in the towers, and lets not forget we are supposed to be the liberators of oppressed people ,not the invaders of sovereign country's that didn't attack us. The most secure air space in history not able to repel 4 unarmed aircraft flying around the country, and the first steel structured buildings to fall from fire in history , all in one day on American soil, and one not hit by a airplane. I also have Oceanside property in Arizona if you believe the news media on this one.
Not sure why others aren't bring this up. I myself am a bit of a history geek. I have tons of WW2 pictures with battle cruisers during the war (in the Atlantic). A very common practice would be to display "mission accomplished" on war ships after every major island has been taken over (when the US was island hopping). Obviously, the war wasn't over when they display the slogan; instead, it was used to boost morale among soldiers after any significant battle/operation.
Criticizing the slogan shows you don't know what it means and the history behind its usage. Instead, it is just rhetoric to push a political agenda.
4,000 troop deaths is a number that just scratches the surface...
"A growing number of U.S. troops whose body armor helped them survive bomb and rocket attacks are suffering brain damage as a result of the blasts. It's a type of injury some military doctors say has become the signature wound of the Iraq war. Known as traumatic brain injury, or TBI, the wound is of the sort that many soldiers in previous wars never lived long enough to suffer. The explosions often cause brain damage similar to "shaken-baby syndrome," says Warren Lux, a neurologist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.
Almost 30,000 American troops have been wounded in Iraq, according to official counts. But that's just the official figure; the Pentagon doesn't have adequate mechanisms in place to accurately track the number of wounded soldiers, and unofficial estimates range to 100,000. How many of those soldiers and Marines suffered wounds so severe that they would have been KIA in any of America's previous conflicts? Nobody knows for sure, but it's clear that 4,000 is a number that doesn't tell the whole story of this war's impact on U.S. servicemen and women."