whenarguing

whenarguing

John L. Austin How to Do Things with Words (I)

argumentics.blogspot.com — This is the first part of a review of J. L. Austins William James lectures delivered at Harvard in 1955. Each lecture will be reviewed individually... View in Crawl 4

Aristotle and his sophisms

argumentics.blogspot.com — Heres a list with all the places in which Aristotle discusses each fallacy (better yet, each sophism, I will post some notes on Aristles approach s... View in Crawl 4

Aristotle and his sophisms

Semantics/Pragmatics in 2011

argumentics.blogspot.com — Oh, you are thinking I have been a layabout all this time, arent you? You are. You do actually believe that no great masterplan of masterblogging i... View in Crawl 4

Semantics/Pragmatics in 2011

Epideictic oratory, my friedns, is alive

argumentics.blogspot.com — See you next year! View in Crawl 4

Dahl on generics. Twice.

argumentics.blogspot.com — Below are some notes from sten Dahls (1975) On generics. Ive seen this paper discussed and criticized in many occasions (in Carlson, 1980 and Krifk... View in Crawl 4

Dahl on generics. Twice.

Unicorns and the meaning of life

argumentics.blogspot.com — Gregory Carlsons (1977) influencing dissertation on the semantics of generic terms (republished as Carlson, 1980) starts with the following forewor... View in Crawl 4

Unicorns and the meaning of life

Goldmine for conversation analysts

argumentics.blogspot.com — SCHLESSINGER: Jade, welcome to the program. CALLER: Hi, Dr. Laura. SCHLESSINGER: Hi. CALLER: I'm having an issue with my hus... View in Crawl 4

Goldmine for conversation analysts

How empirical was ordinary language philosophy?

argumentics.blogspot.com — In a half-page footnote in (1986, p. 142), Sally Jackson comments on her statement that Grices (1975) cooperative principle and Searles (1975) an... View in Crawl 4

How empirical was ordinary language philosophy?

Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicatures

argumentics.blogspot.com — Kent Bach is a Professor of Philosophy at San Fransisco State University. The following text was written by Prof. Bach for a fests... View in Crawl 4

Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicatures

Reference. Part V Solving the Whisky Puzzle

argumentics.blogspot.com — For the most part, what follows can be read and understood independently. Nonetheless, in order to see the subject from a wider stance, Id advise r... View in Crawl 4

Reference. Part V  Solving the Whisky Puzzle

The most famous burden of proof shift?

argumentics.blogspot.com View in Crawl 4

The most famous burden of proof shift?

Resolving The Whisky Puzzle. Preliminaries

argumentics.blogspot.com — In a way, lets say from a bloggers viewpoint, the amount of attention The Whisky Puzzle got cannot but please the little, traffic-desiring part of ... View in Crawl 4

The whisky puzzle

argumentics.blogspot.com — Two colleagues, John and Mary, are at a house party. They are talking to each other. At some point, Mary sees a man, whom she thinks is Smith, dr... View in Crawl 4

The whisky puzzle

Validity as a pain in the reconstruction

argumentics.blogspot.com — I will continue with the small, blissfully interrogative and composedly philosophical posts for a while. Im now in the process of reading some stuf... View in Crawl 4

Validity as a pain in the reconstruction

Rationality, Sex & Principles

argumentics.blogspot.com — The job of pragmatic Principles (capital P) is to describe language use with respect to three dimensions: (1) rules, (2) expectations (3) inference... View in Crawl 4

Rationality, Sex & Principles
Load More

About

Amsterdam
Follow