Digg / peterrojas / History / Comments

All Recent Activity

Showing comments in all sections

60 gb PSP 2!!!

Comment in News (1 digg, 0 replies) - on 12/29/2006

Yeah, this is definitely NOT confirmed, just something Samsung hinted at in a product announcement today. (see comment)

Engadget: Busted for Unethical Blogging

Comment in News (3 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/25/2006

Vincent, perhaps you'd like to disclose to the readers of Digg that you were fired from Engadget for your gross incompetence at Defcon and your complete inability to turn in work that met our editorial standards? Did you know that after I fired you I had … (see comment)

BenQ confirms iPhone?

Comment in News (1 digg, 0 replies) - on 03/22/2006

We don't steal content. We made a mistake and corrected it. (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (0 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/22/2006

I guess I'm willing to give Will, the author of the piece, the benefit of the doubt. (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (0 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

I don't mind! We've got nothing to hide, and as I've said, I have no problem admitting when we're wrong. I'm trying my best to make Engadget a great site and so am always happy to address any concerns anyone has. (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (-3 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

/delete (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (1 digg, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

This was the first I've heard about this, so I just emailed Eliot Phillips, our How-To's editor. He says that it's a coincidence and that Will O'Brien, the author of our piece wasn't aware of the GideonTech guide when he wrote his How-To. (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (2 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

We stopped reading your site a long time ago. We have a lot of sites in our OPML and we have periodically pared which feeds we read and yours was one of them. No offense, but at the time we made the decision, OhGizmo just didn't seem as critical or as rel … (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (4 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

Thanks for being the voice of reason here. I don't think any reasonable person could say that we dominate any market. There are hundreds of other gadget blogs out there, not to mention all the big tech news sites like CNET. I'm the first to concede tha … (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (0 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

Again, you are conflating the issues here. David Ponce isn't complaining about us taking information from his site and not linking back (which is what you're alleging) -- he's complaining about us not reading his site and thus not being exposed to article … (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (2 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

Yup, as I said, we made a mistaken assumption and that led one of our writers to do the wrong thing. I'm not saying we didn't screw up or that we didn't owe DAPreview an apology (which we've offered). (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (6 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

Actually, that's pretty much exactly what happened. We fixed the article as soon as we were aware of the problem. We'd be happy to remove the image or add any further disclaimers, but DAPreview has not requested that. (see comment)

786

Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident

Comment in News (2 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

We didn't cut and paste anyone's article. That's not something we did. What we did (besides stupidly cropping a photo that we thought didn't belong to DAPreview) was link to a site that linked back to the original source rather than directly to the source … (see comment)

1647

Engadget: Busted for Unethical Blogging

Comment in News (2 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/21/2006

May I ask exactly what you mean? We've linked directly back to DAPreview exactly as they've requested. (see comment)

1647

Engadget: Busted for Unethical Blogging

Comment in News (5 diggs, 0 replies) - on 03/20/2006

We are linking to DAPreview, both the image and our "Read" link are hyperlinked to DAPreview. (see comment)

1647

Engadget: Busted for Unethical Blogging

Comment in News (4 diggs, 6 replies) - on 03/20/2006

Hi, this is Peter from Engadget. It is our policy to always correctly link back and credit our sources, and it appears that in this case we did not. That was wrong and we have corrected the article. It was an error on our part for which I take complete re … (see comment)

WIDGX Gadget News (Awesome and Simple)

Comment in News (-2 diggs, 0 replies) - on 02/01/2006

How exactly is Engadget "inaccurate"? I take exception to your comment. (see comment)

Next »« Previous

peterrojas

Filter

All Recent Activity