12 Comments
- Tawni, on 10/12/2007, -3/+11No, she was just being nice in making sure such a sentimental piece of his career remained in the family. she did also pay $360,000 for it for charity so it worked out for the charity and for her family.
- migs87, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I don't get the connection, but then again I am baptist!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I agree with Tawni.
http://www.siamaffiliate.com/ - polymorphs, on 03/04/2008, -0/+0our racquets are a lot cheaper than that lol http://www.realtennis.info/
- vaniahz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I agree with Tawni. It was nice of Graf to buy the rackets as such sentimental items should be kept in the family. She paid a lot for them so it benefited both the charity and her family. It was nice of Agassi to offer the next highest bidder a free tennis lesson.
- thewebguy, on 10/12/2007, -11/+11undermined by his wife..
- spd998, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2I'm catholic and I understand humour you horrible person.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2i was talking about the wife beating being an overwhelming "OK" from the catholic church, you're blind.
- unloud, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2I don't think I would consider a $360,000 donation to his cause to be "undermining"....And this is the new milenium, who can really be bold enough these days to say that a wife can't use her money how she wants?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -9/+1neither do you, I bet you're catholic.


What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the