What is Digg?75 Comments
- QuantumBios, on 05/28/2009, -7/+40Hmmm, it sounds as though it was a controlled demolition.
- SonOfLibertyCA, on 05/29/2009, -4/+30I cannot believe they let this guy on TV!
So when do the trials of the Bush/Obama Administration begin? - Teke616, on 05/29/2009, -4/+28They were pretty desperate to get back into Iraq/Iran/North Korea... seem to recall the interview with Aaron Russo as it pertains to Nick Rockefeller's knowledge of future wars to come prior to 9/11 via his connections to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Amazing how they got that Patriot Act authored so quickly.
I think the whole National Security bit is a sham designed to detract us from aggressive foreign policy for securing natural resources, as well as, police state tactics to quell uprisings here at home.
No wonder Barack Obama looks strikingly similar to George Bush in policy - mynemyne, on 05/29/2009, -2/+22The implications are "dark" according to Gage. We need to remember the word traitor was created in many languages because they have existed for centuries. The culprits could be traitors or just evil greedy murderers. Either way, investigation should not be halted.
- inactive, on 05/29/2009, -2/+19dugg for freedom*)
- inactive, on 05/29/2009, -1/+17http://digg.com/world_news/Top_military_met_to_dis ...
- MikaelRasila, on 05/29/2009, -2/+17We need to get to the bottom of this whole thing since so many people have died so many liberties have been destroyed with the patriot act and military commissions act among so many others based on this huge lie.
- Acrinimiril, on 05/29/2009, -0/+13
Actually, both the Patriot Act and the plans to invade Iraq were drawn up long before Bush was elected President. - inactive, on 05/29/2009, -1/+11At the least, there is a bit more explaining to do regarding why building 7 collapsed the way it did.
- LANKumentary, on 05/29/2009, -1/+9The 9/11 Com report - said building 7 was caused by a diesel fire in the basement of the building - and that's it. no investigation was done conviently. The fact that this hasn't been investigated proves how scared people are of the government. Anyone can see it's a controlled demolition. It's what makes the first two towers so scary. If building 7 was rigged - that means the other two were was well. It's complete insanity - and is it just me or would it be satisfying to see a string of executive summary executions for treason?
- NeoConned08, on 05/29/2009, -0/+7Ya, the article was authored by the cousin of Michael Chertoff, the head of the newly formed as a direct result of 9/11, multi-billion dollar Dept of Homeland Security. Of ALL the people in the world to do an article *debunking* it seems pretty coincidental it was someone related Mr.Chertoff.
- jgar, on 05/29/2009, -1/+8Two Words: silverstein insurance
- insanebrain, on 05/29/2009, -0/+6Look up 'shape charges' and you know why it collapsed as it did.
- emazur, on 05/29/2009, -0/+6Perhaps there was some sort of evidence within WTC 7 that the govt. wanted destroyed - that building had offices for the CIA, DOD, and IRS.
I do strongly believe the airplane strikes were planned and carried out by Al Qaeda ~ bin Laden, but am open to the possibility that the US govt. had foreknowledge of the attacks and decided to piggy back its own operation on top of them - kiwifr00t, on 05/29/2009, -0/+5Please, look at the evidence for yourself.
I thought it was conspiracy lunacy until I looked into it.
I started with trying to understand why building 7, the one that wasn't hit by a plane, collapsed the way it did ...
The conclusion that the official explanation doesn't make sense has horrific implications, but you owe it to yourself to look into it. - Palfo, on 05/29/2009, -0/+5He was just a puppet.
- wissler, on 05/29/2009, -1/+6Explain how aluminum and steel get ground into a uniform and fine powder. Metal mashes under crushing weight, it doesn't fragment. And even if it did fragment, the fragments would not be uniform.
- animalspasm, on 05/29/2009, -5/+9So how come no one believed the so called "wingnuts" when Loose Change was made? They have been making the same argument for 7 years or so. I am glad that Mr. Gage is talking about this, but what the hell took so long?
- ctiger2, on 05/31/2009, -0/+4All 3 buildings fell at the speed of gravity. A tell tale sign of demolition. These are also the first steel structured buildings in the history of the world that have collapsed because of fire. All 3 of these buildings were owned/leased by Larry Silverstein who coincidentally spoke with Ariel Sharon on a weekly basis. There were no human remains found at the Pentagon where supposedly a 757 airliner with passengers crashed. All of the surveillance video tapes from businesses near the location of the Pentagon have still not been released. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what really happened. Too many things point to this whole thing stinks.
- spaceman77, on 05/30/2009, -0/+4They did do those articles but they are poorly written and argued.
Nobody refers to those Popular Mechanics arguments anymore. - ZZeke, on 05/30/2009, -0/+4...not even the staunchest "debunkers".
- jgar, on 05/29/2009, -6/+10Dugg for truth!
- ChstrCopperpot, on 05/29/2009, -2/+6Gage just watched it on Youtube. Since he's made drawings of buildings for 20 years, he's an expert on metallurgy and chemistry and can bring more evidence to the table.
- funhouse1970, on 05/30/2009, -0/+4these are BS talking points... there is proof of unexploded high-tech nano-thermite which is clearly man-made. Also in the dust samples are spherical micro-droplets of iron-rich metal - the by-product of an explosive reaction.
go to ae911truth.org and study the material there. Never before have structures collapsed like this - and you'll never see it again. WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane full of kerosene jet fuel. Your eyes don't lie - watch the footage. Clearly controlled demolitions. - LANKumentary, on 05/30/2009, -0/+4yah - thermoplasticity could cause the entire structure to collapse all at once and for building 7 to fall into its own footprint .... are u sure about that?
- MikaelRasila, on 05/29/2009, -0/+4popular mechanics lied about the whole thing . They are owned by the hearst corporation who is neck deep in it all. Look up turner construction the people hired to do the renovations of the towers . It's all tied together to further their interests.
- Stumpie2012, on 05/29/2009, -6/+9I think that anyone who really follows this story has, at the least, a little bit of doubt about the official story. What we have to do is get this information to the millions of other sheeple in this country who believe every lie the government tells them.
- samcrut, on 05/29/2009, -4/+7Those are ongoing policies. 9/11 was a single event.
If you daily run around breaking windows, eventually you'll get caught. Getting away with breaking one window is easy. - spaceman77, on 05/30/2009, -0/+3yes and be laughed at and be called a tin foil hat nutjob.
- Acrinimiril, on 05/31/2009, -0/+3rickfrothingham, you don't seem to be aware there was molten steel found under all three skyscrapers?
Nor that high-tech nano explosive residue was found throughout the WTC dust?
That was mentioned in the interview - guess you didn't watch it? - ZZeke, on 05/30/2009, -0/+3Then why do we give them our hard earned money?
...Oh that's right - we have to pay for the incompetence, whether we like it or not - under the threat of imprisonment.
Hey wait...that doesn't sound so incompetent anymore!
I agree with you, that our government never seems to get it right, no matter how many billion$ we throw at them. Actually, it seems as if they get more and more incompetent as they get their hands on more and more $$$ - which leads me to believe that most of the incompetence is systemic, as if it were deliberately built into the system...
I'm sure that we can chalk up some of the failures of government to incompetence, but after many years of studying recent history and the major players involved in and around the US government, it's fairly obvious to me that incompetence is a great cover for something more inherently evil, like it or not. It's so much easier for us to think that we're the smart ones and the government is dumb, than to think realize that we're nothing but pawns in a greater agenda, because the implications of such a scenario are truly horrifying. Nobody actually wants to believe they've been fooled, do you? - funhouse1970, on 05/30/2009, -0/+3Who says it was "The Bush administration"? You're asking for us to peg the perpetrators when there hasn't even been a proper investigation.
Incompetence Theory isn't gonna fly here. Compartmentalization and outsourcing to privatized mercenary companies or the involvement of deep black ops forces -- who knows who's really responsible. There's not the political will to follow all the leads out there. - inactive, on 05/29/2009, -2/+5I bet anyone that we will never know who was behind it.
People just "don't want to see the truth".
"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed,
for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more
easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The
primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a
big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies,
but would be ashamed to tell big lies."
Adolf Hitler - insanebrain, on 05/29/2009, -0/+3you 'think' it was a sham ? yeeez. .. wake up.
- kemp34, on 05/29/2009, -1/+4What about the part where the base of the building fails as the top of the building is tipping over on its side and all of a sudden it ALL comes down in one heap with the tilt that had began no longer a factor?
I think YOUR "science" is just as crack as whatever you mention to be crack science. - inactive, on 05/29/2009, -0/+3save us all what you already know, and send us a link
- ZZeke, on 05/29/2009, -0/+3...just like every president in our lifetimes.
- ZZeke, on 05/29/2009, -0/+3Al Qaeda - created and funded by the CIA.
If "Al Qaeda" carried out the operation, someone within our government knew from the get-go. Ever wonder how we were able to post all of the mug-shot pictures from all 19 suspected terrorists on every major newspaper cover within 48 hrs? This is solid proof that at the very least, our government was familiar with all of these characters prior to the attacks. Look into it further and you'll find that the ball was deliberately dropped on tracking and surveilling these "known terrorists". Earlier on, the Bush administration FORMALLY ORDERED the FBI to cease and desist all investigations which pertained to the Bin Laden family.
I'd like to believe that the attacks were planned and carried out solely by "Al Qaeda", but there's too much evidence which leads one to believe that this plan was hatched and nurtured along by interests within our own government, with the cooperation and complicity of other international intelligence agencies.
- sprNmgcHlmt, on 05/29/2009, -7/+9the official story is DEFINITELY *****. just like kennedy and the moonshot.
it's all ***** people.
crazy i know, but still true. - kyosan, on 05/29/2009, -0/+2I don't think it's true that real many people had to know what was going on. A case in point: nano thermite can be applied as paint. Maintenance workers might have been told to paint the steel in certain places with "primer" without knowing they where applying nano thermite. That's why we need an investigation to verify the presents of nano thermite and to investigate how it got there.
- johnjen5321, on 05/29/2009, -0/+2Gage began to do his own research in 2006
- insanebrain, on 05/29/2009, -0/+2*****
- Chewbacca2000, on 05/31/2009, -0/+2TRUTH SMACKDOWN!
- doubelthumbfist, on 05/29/2009, -0/+2i had to go through my browser history to find this again. why doesn't it come up when i search on digg?
- NotASheep, on 05/31/2009, -0/+2Search: Marvin Bush and Securacom for more details on who was responsible for security for the WTC. Also, Larry Silverstein's "pull it" comment.
- wissler, on 05/29/2009, -0/+2Digg's algorithms are secret for a reason.
- MikaelRasila, on 05/31/2009, -0/+1You first have to get through the Media , They have been covering this information up for 8 years . This one single News source airing this is a great step since most people actually believe that the mainstream news is looking out for their best interests. The only interest that the media has is to their corporate overlords . War is good for business and 911 truth exposes the whole lie that brought the world to believe in fake terrorists.
- dillpickle102, on 06/05/2009, -0/+1And even the fuel did heat the steel up enough to make it softer, That woudn't be enough for the building to fall on top of itself. It would fall sideways given that the fuel didn't heat a perfect square of steel.
And have you ever worked with soft steel. It steel retains its form unless you apply pressure. Unless it's heated enough, it doesn't turn into molten steel. - dillpickle102, on 06/05/2009, -0/+1That's true. There's no reason to cover up something that terrorists did unless something happened that we shouldn't know.
If you wanted to demolish a building without anybody finding out, I don't think you'd use c4 or semtex. -
Show 51 - 77 of 77 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is