Prostitute Exposed By "Anonymous" ABC News Interview watch!
gawker.com — When the blogger and prostitute Debauchette was interviewed for an ABC News report, several tricks were used to conceal her identity. She appeared mainly in silhouette, with a distorted profile and a distorted voice. The tricks were not enough, however, to keep her parents from figuring out it was their daughter.
- 176 diggs
- digg it
- Animental, on 04/21/2008, -4/+11KSFW - Dugg for the title "Prostitute Exposed".
- cvxdes1, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1I've ruled out the possibility of a typo there.
What the hell does the K stand for?- Azimuth1, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3Kinda?
- cvxdes1, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1I've ruled out the possibility of a typo there.
- killbert24, on 04/21/2008, -4/+8God, ABC sucks at everything. Their debates blow, their Diane Sawyer blows, and their TV show lineup sucks. DIE ABC DIE!
- mayavada, on 04/21/2008, -2/+3You can really see what has happened to ABC after the death of Peter Jennings. He functioned not only as anchor but as executive editor for the news division. Ted Koppel was replaced by a much lighter format reminiscent of 20/20, and the organization seems to be a mess. It's doubtful that the corporate parentage wants real journalism. Very sad.
- myeyesarered, on 04/21/2008, -2/+4wow, thats what I call journalism
- bossm4n, on 04/21/2008, -4/+55I thought this was going to be a story about exposing a $cientologist hooker. What a letdown.
- Theknightinhell, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1lol same here sadly
- MillionsLivio, on 04/21/2008, -6/+10Buried as inaccurate, completely misleading title and the story itself is lame.
- zero, on 04/21/2008, -8/+33Don't slap Anonymous on a story just to get diggs. misleading = epic fail
- rnwen2750, on 04/22/2008, -2/+18I hardly think the OP used the word just to get diggs. After all, it is the correct usage. Just because you're obsessed with a shadowy cyber-cult doesn't mean everything is about them.
- SRSco, on 04/22/2008, -0/+6It's not the submitters fault. We all can't have MrBabyMan for a username. The problem lies with all the morons who get a hardon for all things Anonymous and dugg this blindly (the story isn't that interesting).
Anonymous/Scientology = the next Ron Paul. I'm fed up with it.
- TypicalAfrican, on 04/21/2008, -6/+1It is time that Anonymous revolt against the old media. The press is controlled by Bush and only the internet is left to stop him.
Valhalla awaits beyond The Tyranny of the CFR- Akaji, on 04/22/2008, -2/+4I often wonder if people like yourself taste their words before they spit them out.
- EntropyNine, on 04/22/2008, -0/+0there are so many conspiracy theories in your post. This has got to be some sort of record.
- smacksaw, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1Don't forget AIPAC, the AFL-CIO, the PTA and MADD.
- sockpuppets, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4Pics or a 2.9 million dollar a year prostitute didn't happen.
- jmpeagle, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2not your average blog anecdote...
"He ***** me over his sofa, the flat of his hand pressing down into my back. I felt him take my hair in his hand before he pulled out to come across my lower back, which splattered in a thick, swerving pattern. After, he took a snapshot of his come against my winter-pale skin. Once he toweled my back down and we both dressed, I took a look. It was a beautiful shot." - ileftfark, on 04/22/2008, -9/+2FTA: "She appeared mainly in silhouette, with a distorted profile and a distorted voice. She was identified only as a "beautiful," "highly educated" woman with a day job in the arts. The tricks were not enough, however, to keep Debauchette's parents from figuring out it was their daughter on the screen when they tuned in, as fate would have it, to watch the show."
No mention of "anonymous". Buried for inaccuracy + level 9 faggotry. - Spoonicus, on 04/22/2008, -12/+7WHAT THE ***** DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ANONYMOUS??!!! GAAAAHHH!!
- colincornaby, on 04/22/2008, -1/+9This may comes as a shock to you, but the word Anonymous is an actual word in the English language that has a meaning, it's not just a name.
- miketgt, on 04/22/2008, -1/+7leave the prostitutes alone
- dzzle420, on 04/22/2008, -6/+2What? what? in the butt..
- DeviantDragon, on 04/22/2008, -1/+4Don't exactly think its ABC's fault if she approved everything and felt it was sufficient.
- DrPaul2008, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1It is ABC's fault that the interview sucked, however.
- nooreazy, on 04/22/2008, -2/+2" He ***** me over his sofa, the flat of his hand pressing down into my back. I felt him take my hair in his hand before he pulled out to come across my lower back, which splattered in a thick, swerving pattern. After, he took a snapshot of his come against my winter-pale skin. Once he toweled my back down and we both dressed, I took a look. It was a beautiful shot. "
Good Fap material right their- coachmcguirk, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1...it was ok..
- Picaroon, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3I hope this gets over 9000 buries for inaccuracy.
- iheartboobs, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1her voice isn't distorted
- itsJALbert, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4The word "anonymous" is being used as an adjective for the noun "interview".
- whoreable, on 04/22/2008, -2/+1"She was identified only as a "beautiful," " - Not with that nose. Just cause she is young, blond, and easy, does not make her "beautiful.
- DrPaul2008, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Easy? I don't remember her mentioning anything about her personal life.. You've got better then $2.9 mil set aside for a years worth of sex?
- whoreable, on 04/22/2008, -2/+3some women wouldn't take 2.9 mil for one second of sex, hence easy.
- DrPaul2008, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Yes, but the vast majority, including, likely every woman in your family from the way you're talking about it, do, or has done it, for free.
I'm not trying to offend, it's just a matter of perspective. This is this woman's business. As a business, I imagine she, and her customers, keep things simple. If that's what you meant by "easy", then I'd imagine you're correct. However, if instead of "not complicated", you meant to imply that she is promiscuous, I disagree. You can't really know what her personal practices are.
- DrPaul2008, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Yes, but the vast majority, including, likely every woman in your family from the way you're talking about it, do, or has done it, for free.
- whoreable, on 04/22/2008, -2/+3some women wouldn't take 2.9 mil for one second of sex, hence easy.
- DrPaul2008, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Easy? I don't remember her mentioning anything about her personal life.. You've got better then $2.9 mil set aside for a years worth of sex?
- TheWindBlows, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Your Daughter's a cheap whore!
- UltramegaOK, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1I'd go 2girls1cup style for $2.9 million.
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the