What is Digg?145 Comments
- Noodleson, on 07/15/2008, -10/+83That's a bit of a stretch don't you think?
- ftx437, on 07/16/2008, -7/+62Whatever........auto buried for hufingtonpost propaganda bs
- airwalkery2k, on 07/15/2008, -7/+52I hope they don't find out that my profile lists me as being in the Whig Party.
- cmakvaca, on 07/16/2008, -6/+48I'm just so ***** outraged over this blatant misuse of public information and I can't believe that...
oh wait I don't care. stupid article, stupid topic, stupid conclusion. - loudmouth11, on 07/16/2008, -11/+47huffington post is pure crap
- inactive, on 07/15/2008, -12/+43Fox news does..not..like /liberals/? GTFO
- cg4et, on 07/16/2008, -2/+31I think it is fairly common for the cable nets to change guests at the very last minute as storylines evolve.
I have no idea why the scheduling change was made, but I can imagine a lot of reasons more likely than ideological censorship. - JordonOverElo, on 07/16/2008, -0/+23Even for a conspiracy lover like myself, this seems like a pretty big stretch...
- poprocksandsoda, on 07/16/2008, -12/+34This is such a piece of *****. Do you really think Fox News, CNN or any major network does research on Facebook? Get real.
- qxrt, on 07/16/2008, -2/+23Digg should have a way to punish users who submit stupid articles like this. Something like "No article submissions for a week."
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -9/+29huffingtonpost.com burry don't read
- brettg102, on 07/16/2008, -9/+29Does huffington post have a physical headquarters? I'd like to 'splode it.
- diggduggDOOM, on 07/16/2008, -0/+18Here's my solution: Stop posting every stupid little bit of information about yourself for all to see.
I only have two items that identify me on the intertubes now, and they're both short professional notations.
People have no concept of the benefits of privacy these days. Get off my lawn! - dan222555, on 07/16/2008, -6/+24There's Obama supporters and far-left liberals on FNC everyday. More ***** from The Huffington Post...
- brettg102, on 07/16/2008, -1/+18Those slashes are leaning right you tard! liberals lean left!
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -5/+22And the Leftingtonpost keeps getting worse and worse. Hey let's make unfounded assertions without any evidence. Please Please digg peeps institute the huffington post ban.
- dk911, on 07/16/2008, -7/+24No, no, no... you don't understand. It's Fox (err, Faux news) and they cancelled on the guy. Not because his services weren't needed. You need to read between the lines! It means that because he lists himself as "Very Liberal" they don't want him on the show. See how that goes on a liberal website like the Huffington rag?
- Ilyanep, on 07/16/2008, -2/+16Is there any setting I can set so I never see anything from huffingtonpost.com on the fp again?
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -2/+15You thought something from HuffPo would be real OR interesting?
- imightbewrong, on 07/16/2008, -4/+15More top notch journalism from The Huffington Post!!!!
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -5/+16Yet another huffinitpost article on the front page of digg. Disgraceful.
- thedogfatherx, on 07/16/2008, -8/+19Hufingtonpost propaganda. When will you liberal freaks let it go. Your starting to look a wee bit psycho.
- thegreenspanput, on 07/16/2008, -14/+24a better tip would be don't adopt a left-leaning political ideology.
- masterm1nd, on 07/16/2008, -2/+12Not to mention an actual tactic of Fox is to have on the further out liberals (very liberal) so they look crazy in comparison to the more moderates.
- tehxhorace, on 07/16/2008, -2/+12i love the fact that they have to mention that Virginia Grace (of fox noise) is a "Christian"
them damn christians, crusading around the internet
oppressing our freedumz - earnjam, on 07/16/2008, -2/+11I'm pretty sure there was no mention of Bush in that sentence.
- celkin, on 07/16/2008, -0/+8burry?
- earnjam, on 07/16/2008, -1/+8Yes. You have to understand what you're dealing with, but it's a resource, so why not look at it? I've definitely seen news channels use pictures from Facebook before.
Heck our local news doesn't even bother to crop the image and shows parts of the Facebook page half the time... - orangefly, on 07/16/2008, -6/+13yes they have liberals that either don't know what they are talking about or if they do they cut their mics, shout over them until they can't be heard, or spin the interview out of contex later....
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -7/+14Thanks for wasting my time and thinking this might be an interesting story, Diggers.
- bryonpierce, on 07/16/2008, -0/+6no-issue
- kgunning, on 07/16/2008, -2/+8*Facebook
- masterm1nd, on 07/16/2008, -1/+7Seriously, how do we go about doing that?
- inactive, on 07/16/2008, -3/+9Neither the HuffingtonGarbage or the original article gave the link to the Facebook bio. I call that garbage reporting.
HuffingtonGarbage basically ran the story without verifying the content of the bio! - inactive, on 07/16/2008, -2/+8I can't recall the last time Huffington Post had a guest contribution from a neocon, or even a regular conservative. Yet, here they are pointing fingers at another media outlet's bias.
- hauntedchippy, on 07/16/2008, -2/+8Well it's not like I needed another reason to avoid the Huffington post but oh well the more the merry I suppose.
- johndavidjack, on 07/16/2008, -0/+5Too bad HuffPo wasn't around in the 60's, so they could write a smear piece like this about how the KKK didn't want Martin Luther King to be a guest speaker at any of their rallies...
- tdhurst, on 07/16/2008, -0/+5Um...yeah, I bet they all do. While I doubt they canceled the guest because of what they found, I would HOPE they would be researching everyone.
Oh, and in case you haven't heard...Facebook is kinda big now. - DaDrake, on 07/16/2008, -1/+6Yes, because cable news channels never change guest based on what is important.
- brettg102, on 07/16/2008, -1/+6Block any user you see who submits it...it's what I do. Bye Zaibatsu!
- Badandy127, on 07/16/2008, -2/+7ZERO EVIDENCE.
- perrym, on 07/16/2008, -0/+4we all know huffpo loves to rant on about FNC and digg has made it clear that a good old FNC hate-fest is always OK but this seems to be clutching at straws a little here.
this seems a little bit desperate to me, I'm sure there will be a better anti-FNC story coming up soon that everybody can put their full anger behind but this one doesn't really seem worth it. - brettg102, on 07/16/2008, -0/+4hole! Jesus!
- PleaseJustDie, on 07/16/2008, -1/+5"he and co-editor Maureen O'Connor published an op-ed in the Los Angeles Time about how kids of the "Facebook Generation" who plan on running for office one day may run into difficulty because all the stupid stuff they did in college will be archived on the Internet for all eternity"
And his interview was canceled because of the information on his facebook account... I can't decide if this is irony or expected... - altgeeky1, on 07/16/2008, -1/+5Fox takes PLENTY of liberal guests... just usually someone who fits the stereotypes of liberals that Fox likes to portray, or people NOT well-equipped to survive a partisan ambush or debate... someone easy to make angry and fluster and get off track. Fox hit jobs.
This person should take it as a compliment he didn't make that kind of cut. - warriorscot, on 07/16/2008, -0/+4They would have to be bad journalists, idiots or both not too use it, and ive seen allot of better networks than Fox and CNN use facebook.
- DaDrake, on 07/16/2008, -5/+8Its odd, because many people often criticize Fox news for having "screaming" matches by putting conservative and liberals on at the same exact time. It is entertaining, but you sometimes can never tell what the other is saying =p
But I guess today we will criticize Fox for not having liberals on. A bit hypocritical eh? - BabyWookie, on 07/16/2008, -0/+3We are not talking about the reasons for invading Iraq here.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 146 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is