23 Comments
- Ilyanep, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9Ooohh twice on the main page in one day!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8This was already on the frontpage with 1,000 diggs yesterday.
http://digg.com/technology/YouTube.com_Downgrades_Feature_to_Prevent_Copyright_Violations - MikeCampo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Alright boys, time to report this dupe!
- thenativeraver, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Youtube is going to be a lot less popular over night.
- Splitt3rxx, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4idiot, this was on the front page this morning, quit digging it.
- thenativeraver, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4No, but they have to verify the content before it goes live.
- misterpony, on 10/12/2007, -3/+5This is the first story ever with Youtube involved that is Digg-worthy.
- asdfer, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2That Chen Guy said it in "Inside The Net" Podcast 3.21.2006 http://twit.tv/itn15
It is actually last week news. - ddrirc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Does google video have length limits?
- Ilyanep, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Wouldn't G4 still own the copyrights to those?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Except for the original submission of this story that made it to the frontpage yesterday.
- yensed, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1This Sucks... There was this user who would upload full episodes of The Screen Savers.. I'll miss seeing all those episodes again. But, i saved them to my HDD. So, Ha....
- misterpony, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Touche. Didn't see the original.
- Bitgod, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The move makes perfect sense to me, youtube should be about post silly stuff that's shorter than 10 minutes anyway. As long as Heat Vision and Jack stays up...
- Haarball, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3"So, people will just split their movies into 10 minute segments.
This only stops dumb users."
Exactly. There will be a decline in illegal submissions, but then it'll grow again. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4A service which is making no money and is not setting limits is bound to fail.
Did i hear the first web 2.0 bubble burst? - dirtyfratboy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2First Gmail limits e-mails per day, and now this?
This is *****. - rudolphdude, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2P-O-P!
- carpespasm, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1ohh say it ain't so!
- burnt1ce85, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1It's to prevent from leechers sucking up too much of their bandwith and ofcourse... minimize the ultimate DIGG EFFECT!
- arnaudh, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Duh. I was surprised they got away with such copyright infrigments in the first place.


What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the