What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Join the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Facebook view!
facebook.com/DragonAgeOrigins - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
45 Comments
- geminitojanus, on 10/11/2007, -6/+61http://www.youtube.com/ytremixer
I really wish people would just link to the content and not some meta-blog adwhore. - eschompthis, on 10/11/2007, -0/+23i was thinking of buying Final Cut Pro, but this will do
/sarcasm - j1a1g1, on 10/11/2007, -1/+12An interesting collaboration between YouTube and Adobe to create this software.
Still lacking functionality though. - whatsupimphil, on 10/11/2007, -2/+12I agree with the first commenter on the blog; it would be better if you could edit other people's videos.
- championchap, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7@dankenstein (#7223998)
You know when they sold you that computer, and they told you it was a "dual core".. well from the sounds of it what they really meant was they stuck two pentiums 2's together with chewing gum.
I suggest you inquire about a refund. - calebhawk, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6amen
- dbr_onix, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4How will encouraging people to edit their videos make it worse? It can only make it better, or stay the same.. I'd prefer to suffer though the evil star-transitions and "fancy" wipe-effects than hours of shaky-camera footage and people saying "Uhh"..
- dn11, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4this is pointless for most people that would want to do any editing to their video. you get to edit a little crappy 320x240 heavily compressed version of your video, and then after editing it you can't post it elsewhere without ripping it and recompressing it yet again. you will never have a higher quality version of your edited product. there are a lot of things youtube needs, and editing tools isn't one of them. they need to work on their horrible page layout - youtube is so ugly, cluttered and spammy . they seriously need to up the resolution - many of youtubes imitators already allow for much better quality. and I wish they would move comments to a separate page - youtube consistently has some of the most vile commentary this side of break.com - people shouldn't have to see that unless they want to
- BackwardsPanda, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4Thank god theres no star wipe, that would be disastrous.
- peaches017, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5This will just spawn a new era of ***** wannabe "remixers."
- zdiddy85, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3I'm going to miss the Windows Movie Maker Big Word Transitions though... :(
- DCB360, on 04/11/2008, -1/+3Connecting to server...
- RedGiant, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3Curious, it says you can put Photos in there...well how do you do that?
- dbr_onix, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2"Now even more people will be able to create terrible videos. Thanks YouTube! Thanks Adobe!"
No! Now people might actually both editing videos - When Youtube first introduced that "Upload video directly from your webcam!" feature, I was worried(? not quite the right way to describe it) that would would just upload videos consisting of about 10% what the intended to, 90% being "Uhhh", "I mean", "What was I going to say agian..." and such.
With some kind of simplistic online-editing people will be more likely to edit the videos down, which is a good thing.. Obviously the results are hardly going to rival FCP or Avid Free DV, iMovie or even Windows Movie Maker - Then again, give the intended users of this editing tool any of those applications and the results would be worse (or non-existant in the cases of FCP/Xpress, since they can be very hard to pick up for people not used to such applications..)
It'd be a good starting point - you never know, someone might decide to play around with the upload-editing feature, become interested in video editing and end up creating something great - Sure people can use it to make awful videos, but they videos would have been bad anyway.. - BobbyMC, on 07/21/2008, -1/+3They need to turn this Google Maps concept into a Google Earth level self contained program. There's no reason for this limited and very asslaggy method when they can have a program that uses youtube login information.
Except that their partner is Adobe and that would be offering a free low end video editor, and not forcing video hobbyists without any money to pay thousands of dollars is simply NO GOOD. - doshindude, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2this is way too simple. not enough stuff.
Magix Movie Edit Pro is fine for me. - MrSunshine, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2"people shouldn't have to see that unless they want to"
Or they could just introduce a thumbs up/down function like here on Digg, which I'm still waiting for since ages, but instead they come up with a ***** remixer first. - nav1, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2@championchap:
Not if he has a MacBook. For some reason, flash makes mine really hot. But I'm leaning towards it being a flass-plugin issue on Macs, not processing related, since the Macbook performance is top-notch nonetheless. - floguy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1http://www.eyespot.com is this, but better.
- Sawta, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Wow, that sounds like a pretty terrible program...at the moment.
A stand alone version with "graphics and caption" section that has some better selections over fecking baby bottles and gingerbread men would be a good start...but I'm only begging to imagine all of the GREAT blur and fade in/out effects headed to a youtube video near me. - gamebittk, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Just like Eyespot.
- dbr_onix, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1...what a random, slightly worrying (in an obsessive-manner) thing to wonder..
- bpapa, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I used to work for a site in the same space as YouTube, that also was considering having video editing software online. It baffled me that large amounts of money would be wasted on providing this kind of technology. I would think most people who actually WANT to create their own videos would already know about the software that is available, and that it is much more powerful and useful then something that would be solely web-based.
Hopefully YouTube isn't seeing this as the next big thing. - julianrod, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I want pixellated transitions!!!!
- grayapple, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3Windows Movie Maker 4TW!
- vroom171, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Great.
Prepare for someone to make a remix of a remix of a remix. - ohnnyj, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Wouldn't be a new Google product without the "beta" moniker.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0I love YouTube... though, not sure whether I will be using this newly launched feature..
- CurlyHayami, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Ain't that right-the categories alone have spawned tons of wannabe comedians and directors....
- joeplayer91, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2i wonder what Alex Trebek Albrecht will say
- cpugeek2214, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I've really given up hope on YouTube. It's turning in to Myspace.
- SwordOfShannara, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1sometimes the sky turns green and then it doesn't ========= >> BewARE the little spoons
- ninetyone, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1@corporalclegg: we're not all youtube fanboys though ;)
- echud, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0Yay! More Naruto FMVs... x[ Dammit.
- corporalclegg24, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2I thought this would have a lot more digg.s
- bking, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1"powered by adobe premier express"
Well, that's going to disappoint a lot of potential editors. Wave goodbye to your dreams, kids! - CurlyHayami, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Man-I'm sick of youtube, it's already bad enough-this'll make it worse.
- grayapple, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1Sarcasm...
- KielKilla, on 10/11/2007, -2/+0@gutistg
I agree out of all of youtubes video's I might like 5% of them. Why would anyone want to use this software? It going to have way less features/etc then a normal video editing software. Youtube has a terrible community and video quality too... [/trolling] - gutistg, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2Now even more people will be able to create terrible videos. Thanks YouTube! Thanks Adobe!
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -6/+3great, it wasn't enough to have to deal with an onslaught of amaetur video makers, b utnow we have to deal with them trying to edit.
- nick2, on 10/11/2007, -4/+1Just like iMovie...
- deepanjannag, on 10/11/2007, -4/+0What a cumbersome product! I feel www.jumpcut.com is far better.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -7/+1more tools for the infowar against the new world order! vote ron paul 08
- dankenstein, on 10/11/2007, -13/+2merely viewing a flash video on youtube runs up my CPU and heats up my machine, and it is dual core. i cant wait to see how many computer resources this will take up, because i am pretty sure that editing a flash video within a flash app has to be the most inefficient concept ever devised.
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is