184 Comments
- Universal, on 10/12/2007, -23/+261Gmail is still better :-)
- Universal, on 10/12/2007, -3/+145Now is the perfect time for Google to unleash it's goal of "infinity plus one".
- mrmdc, on 10/12/2007, -15/+119I use my gmail all the time and I'm nowhere near their set limit (and i never delete). What do i need a fake 'unlimited' capacity for? So i can email my friends dvd rips?
In any case, yahoo's interface just isn't as easy to use as gmail. - timpkmn89, on 10/12/2007, -5/+96This couldn't have come at a better time for me. After all these years of use, I only have about 98% of my 2GB left.
- ahill7, on 10/12/2007, -2/+89Hope this is more unlimited as the "unlimited bandwidth" from ComCast :P
- G-RaZoR, on 10/12/2007, -1/+66great so they have unlimited storage, but max file size limit per email is 10mb. WHY?!
This is 2007, 10mb is nothing anymore. - elvenseven, on 10/12/2007, -15/+76Yeah, no such thing as unlimited storage.
- neeyo, on 10/12/2007, -6/+59Dear porn on my computer: we've found you a new home.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -6/+59@mrmdc
You know, that's exaclty the kind of thing I was thinking of doing when I saw the headline. This bring back memories from high school a few years back. For whatever reason, I was announced that when the network folders were uncapped. So one day I decided to find out how much "unlimited" was, and popped a 100MB AVI file on there and just kept making duplicates of it over and over again. Turns out unlimited is a shade over 1TB. Needless to say that was the end of the uncapped accounts. - cds0528, on 10/12/2007, -13/+60you mean you were paying?!? for Yahoo!?!
- Salgat, on 10/12/2007, -3/+45Just a matter of time till we find the unofficial limit.
- McGriddles, on 10/12/2007, -8/+47yeah, and Gmail has a faster interface, and more useful features.
- papereira, on 10/12/2007, -9/+47Unlimited Storage = More SPAM!!
- bmatherlyjr, on 10/12/2007, -3/+36Just like everything else in the market place, the minute someone big does something the others will quickly fall in suite.
- thatsmyaibo, on 10/12/2007, -5/+37I'm still waiting for yahoo mail to be POPable. Get with the times yahoo.
- Kwipper, on 10/12/2007, -1/+33Good. Now if only Yahoo would let me use pop for free.
- slugicide, on 10/12/2007, -0/+31More storage is great, I guess, but what I really want is to be able to send bigger e-mails. 10MB is so tired.
- netdroid9, on 10/12/2007, -3/+34I doubt it. It looks infinite, but they'll have some system to stop you from overloading the servers. They'd be stupid not to.
- dagooh, on 10/12/2007, -3/+31It's too late, I left my yahoo account to die years ago because they took my pop3 away, I don't care about the storage now, that was important when most companies were giving 1 or 2mb of storage, now everyone gives at least 1GB so it all comes down to service, right now at least to me Gmail wins in that area.
- papereira, on 10/12/2007, -0/+25What I really want to know is, when are they gonna get rid of the annoying AD at the end of each email?
- joerod, on 10/12/2007, -2/+24gmail lets me use pop yahoo charges for this, gmail still better.
- jtrost, on 10/12/2007, -2/+23This is great, except for the fact that there is no such thing as "unlimited storage". Still, that phrase is a great marketing ploy for Yahoo's less computer-savvy users.
- brundlefly76, on 10/12/2007, -5/+23Before you decide GMail is better, make sure you actually *use* Yahoo! Mail Beta for a while.
I didnt think GMail was that great when I just 'checked it out', I had to forward my primary mail to it for a few weeks and use it exclusively.
I am going to do the same with Yahoo! Mail Beta for a while, because it looks pretty slick.
Native left-click menus are nice, it doesnt keep reloading entire screens for simple actions as a good Ajax app shouldnt need to, and I never really got completely sold on 'labels' over custom folders. Plus, domains are like $2 on deal, and they have web hosting to go with it. - dungbeetle, on 10/12/2007, -4/+21I think he's referring to the overstuffed, ad-infested interface it has now. Gmail is clean and to the point. If they want me to use Yahoo, they're going to have to get rid of some of that bloat.
- timdorr, on 10/12/2007, -18/+33I like Yahoo better. Simple reason: Throwaway addresses. I can give out an address without having to incur any additional spam. Plus, it lets me track who's giving out my information. Plus, Gmail just feels kind of basic to me. With the many thousands of emails I get a day (spam or otherwise), managing those is a lot easier in a sortable table than a paged interface. The closest I can get in gmail is searching and selecting all the results, but that does result in false positives.
I dunno, maybe you guys are forming your opinion based on the old interface? *shrug* - bmwboy2844, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14Yeah, and the attachment size limit doesn't suck...
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -6/+19Guess where I'll put huge files? DVDrips... I mean Linux distros sure take up a lot of space, but now I won't have to worry about that.
- lcohiomatty86, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13this my friend, is called the almighty attachment size limit. whether it be 2, 5, or 10 mb's.
google has a similar system in place, a few months ago I tried backing up a gig of pictures to one of my gmail accounts, and halfway through they put a few hour hold on my account, so gmail at least has a system to try to minimize abuse. - Dmitrik, on 10/12/2007, -1/+13"Users are subject to Yahoo’s abuse policies, which requires users to follow “normal email practices” and not engage in activities like using Yahoo mail for basic online storage (a number of services have popped up to help people use Gmail for this purpose). Abusive accounts will not be summarily deleted - users will be notified by Yahoo and/or accounts suspended, but users will still have access to the data." - from the text
- and the limit for each email will still be at 10Mb. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+16Yspace would be a nice firefox extension
- nerditup, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12Im sure someone at Yahoo calculated how long it would take to fill up their "unlimited" storage capacity by assuming a bunch of numbers and taking a look at the max transfer size of 10mb and realized that no one could possibly fill that up. Someone on digg could probably verify that it would take a long time to actually fill up the space even if you constantly uploaded for x many hours.
- neoncricket, on 10/12/2007, -3/+14For curiosity's sake, I might see if I can fill up terabytes of space with as much junk as I possibly can. I can't be the only one who would want to try that. How long would that work for Yahoo!?
- pminze, on 10/12/2007, -3/+14All I use my Yahoo account for is SPAM.
The new Yahoo mail is all too little too Late. - kmckanna, on 10/12/2007, -10/+21Until I see Yahoo look and act like Gmail, and get rid of its "immature" web-mail vibe, I will stick to Gmail.
By the time I need to save 2 gigs of mail, there will be something even better. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13@timdorr
your_name+throwaway1@gmail.com and then a nice filter - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10Imagine if Gmail didn't exist, we would still be using 10MB yahoo/msn mail
- gcnaddict, on 10/12/2007, -5/+14I can understand Google not doing anything to counter this, but I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to give unlimited space for mail *and* for other files (in other words, GDrive). It would easily surpass Yahoo.
- hihyooka, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8Or you could have simply read the first sentence in the description which states that they won't start rolling this out until May...
- mobilehavoc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Great...glad to see my $20/year is getting me something that non-paying members can't /sarcasm. Bastards.
- con40dmitri, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9Yea Gmail all the way for me.
- adml_shake, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7I'm still dumping all my spam in hotmail just out of spite.
- fuzzmeister, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Not quite as easy as it sounds. There are close to a billion email users, all of whom would need to upgrade. Not very "simple".
- kz26, on 10/12/2007, -4/+10Well, let me bring up a very simple saying.
Quality, not quantity. - counterplex, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7hmmm as bad as they are, AOL has been offering unlimited email storage for AOL members (free now) for a long time now. I'll probably get dugg down since it's considered cool to trash AOL but every now and then even AOL does a good thing :)
Edit: News item from 06/2005
http://www.betanews.com/article/AOL_Pushes_AIM_Mail_Unlimited_Storage/1118075642 - unloud, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8I think it was very convenient that they did this just a couple of days before Gmail's birthday. It seems to me like Yahoo! is trying to 1up google before they have a chance to 1up them.
- gotamd, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7They already allow you unlimited spam. As long as it's in your spam folder it doesn't count toward your 1GB limit. I guess that in a way, Yahoo already has unlimited email storage (though I think that spam emails get automatically deleted after 30 days like they do with Gmail) ;)
- mercurysquad, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Spam and Trash folders don't count towards your storage limit... joke failed.
- tanaeem, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7My elder brother used to say "Never think about E-Mail storage, it will increase atumetically as you reach the limit"
- Ascendant, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6@thatsmyaibo - Yahoo Mail used to be POP-able, "back in the day" maybe five, six years ago or so, but then they took it away from the free users when they introduced their premium service.
- atbnet, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6This announcement reminded me to check my Yahoo e-mail account. 1200 pieces of spam. The only 'legit' e-mail is from ESPN since I can't figure out my user name to stop delivery to it.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 181 discussions



What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved