What is Digg?8 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11I always feel so welcome when I go to Zombo.com
- chris9902, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7it's all going to end in tears...
my tears after missing out :( - r©ain, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8Uhh, what Web2.0 Bubble?
Web2.0 is a design paradigm.
The dot com days was a stock market phenomena.
Whoever thinks web2.0 has anything to do with the dot com days besides the fact that they both in thier own way relate to internet services is as clueless as the morons that thought us web developers were all out of work in 2001, even though they continued to use the internet every freaking day.
Let's all say it together: "Web2.0 is a way of making websites operate, it has nothing to do with how web sites are funded or operated as a business" - cody50, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4http://digg.com/tech_news/*****
always gives me a laugh. - argoff, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4IMHO, we don't have too much of a web2 bubble, but we have a huge gargantuan bigger than Mt. Everest housing bubble. We also have a pending currency crises. The information age is making it very difficult for the federal reserve banking system to manipulate the currency values without causing immediate shock-waves across all markets. These shock-waves happen to water down their newly minted money before they can spend it, thus they get no more bang for thr buck than the rest of us. Add that to the over saturated debt in the government and housing sectors, the over saturation of dollars in foreign markets, record low US savings rate, the massive account deficit, and you have a recipe for disaster no matter who we elect this season. (hint, people would be really wise to buy precious metals)
- hotdoggy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1the naming of web 2.0 companies has to stop. Everyone has cute weird names that have nothing to do with the company and all are less than 2 syllables long.
Why not come up with creative names like http://whatsonmybookshelf.com which incorporates the name and logo. - BocoDragon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1It says AOL bought TimeWarner.... it's gotta be the other way around, right?
- brentzilla, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0From Wikipedia:
"In 2001, a new company called AOL Time Warner was created when AOL purchased Time Warner. The deal, announced in 2000, employed an unusual merger structure in which each original company merged into a newly created entity. The Federal Trade Commission approved the deal on December 14, 2000. It was then subject to a public comment period of 30 days, until January 16, 2001."
So, no.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is