4 Comments
- deluxndotcom, on 09/03/2008, -0/+2He doesn't put down Google at all, he says Chrome is a very worthy browser but it needs improvement. This is the first version so why wouldn't it?! Buried as inaccurate.
- AndrewDB, on 09/03/2008, -0/+1So.. A guy who writes an IT column for a mag where people think that Email is high tech thinks that this browser's *****?
Pompus bastard can go stuff his column where the Java applets don't load (IE!). - OhFrak, on 09/03/2008, -0/+1Buried for *****.
- Raian, on 09/03/2008, -2/+2Flawed logic...It's the first version of a browser that could have been in development for years, by one of the richest companies in the world-- why excuse flaws in a browser, when you would not excuse a similar flaw in say a car or some other object. It's totally irrational.



What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our