What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
24 Comments
- wolphcry, on 11/15/2007, -1/+16Come a long way from the early days. I can remember a "big" story with only 200 diggs
- SparkyMaGee, on 11/15/2007, -1/+11The WSJ WAS an excelent source of news... we'll see now that News corp owns it.
- JC4P, on 11/15/2007, -0/+6I can remember the original beta announced on kevin rose's blog
- beathermit, on 11/15/2007, -3/+7I'm not too fond of rupert murdoch .
- sb76117, on 11/15/2007, -0/+3hmmm wsj... rupert murdoch & digg... i knew it!
- vat0r, on 11/15/2007, -1/+4Might be a good thing but I'm doubtful.
- inactive, on 11/15/2007, -0/+2I just lost respect for the Wall street journal.
- joshua5, on 11/15/2007, -1/+3Hopefully with changes like this we'll see a reduction in blog spam and an increase in digging the ORIGINAL ARTICLES.
- mlostracco, on 11/15/2007, -2/+4So, is every second headline going to have a "WSJ.com -" in front of it now?
- genericface, on 11/15/2007, -0/+2Christ, probably.
It's weak news, WSJ is opening up anyways. - JeffS, on 11/15/2007, -1/+2Do we really need a review with screenshots or does TechConsumer just need the traffic.
- G-RaZoR, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Yeah, I remember that too. Like how he said it was a "friend" who was running Digg. Kevin was being silly.
- OsakaWilson, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1It is if you are worried that Digg is becoming a sellout that is about to go the way of Netscape.com.
- saifatlast, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Yeah, well I remember watching Kevin Rose being conceived.
- OsakaWilson, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1We don't have to, they seem to already have a team of shills to do it for us. And a Digg sock-puppet brigade to make this appear popular.
- Heinekenny, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Is that means we have to start praising Fox now and listen to KR how awesome Bill O'Reilly is??
- fkr3, on 11/15/2007, -1/+2As near as I can figure all that's happened is the WSJ added "digg this" links and some bright spark at digg added a link to the crappy search page that searches for wsj.com. Colour me something less than impressed - like bored.
Anyone who already uses digg + the WSJ has the ability to submit or find WSJ stories I'm sure, so I think this is really a pretty mundane thing at best. - wulanshout, on 11/12/2008, -0/+0http://www.wulanshout.com/seo/busby-seo-test-seo-c ...
Busby SEO Test has been released! The next Busby Web Solutions Search Engine Optimisation Challenge, start on October 1st, and Finish on January 31st,2009. Get join and wind $ 5000 grand prize - craig4, on 11/15/2007, -1/+1that is a very slick interface, and seems to be very easy to use.
- RoyalPwner, on 11/15/2007, -2/+2Mildly cool/interesting. Important in any way? No.
- inactive, on 11/15/2007, -3/+2How does that relate the the article?
- pictureDIGGER, on 11/15/2007, -4/+2This is front page worthy?
- macaca, on 11/15/2007, -4/+2The Digg and WSJ kinda reminds me of iPhone with AT&T. Digg couldn't come up with a better newspaper?
- h0zae, on 11/15/2007, -6/+3we get it Digg - quit spamming
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is