87 Comments
- inactive, on 10/29/2007, -6/+81Wow, I hope they've got a wicked hosting service, or instead of 16 Billion, they'll be stuck with only 404!
- exomni, on 10/29/2007, -1/+511. Watermarks.
2. This masterpiece has long since faded. Too bad nobody thought to take high quality digital images of it back in the 15th century. - str3ama, on 10/28/2007, -7/+47With such a high quality version of the painting, we can finally tell whether St. Peter was a rabbit or not. ah...closure at last.
- notjamt9000, on 10/28/2007, -1/+39Bah, they had to ruin it with "H9" watermarks at higher zoom levels
- inactive, on 10/30/2007, -0/+35The kid from Titanic.
- inactive, on 10/29/2007, -2/+37The Last Supper display is located at: http://www.haltadefinizione.com .
- sdubois92, on 10/30/2007, -5/+39they got it from Jesus you retard.
- suxmonkey, on 10/28/2007, -4/+32I would love to see a 404 error broadcast into space too pls
- canthraxp, on 10/28/2007, -1/+27"uTorrent: Comcast has blocked 'The_last_supper.png' from user 'God'"
That same day, a lighting blows up all comcast servers. - louiemantia, on 10/30/2007, -0/+24I wish they had versions you could actually download :(
It'd make a nice desktop picture. - inactive, on 10/29/2007, -0/+19At least nobody thought of putting watermarks all over it in the 15th century.
- jonshipman, on 10/28/2007, -4/+21Burried. We all know God would only download the .tif file
- AndrewDB, on 01/10/2008, -1/+16You've been reported to Digg Abuse.
How much do you idiots get paid for sitting on websites posting the same damn thing all day? Surely it can't be more than minimum wage. - ChromaVita, on 10/28/2007, -0/+14Damn how big is your monitor?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08 ... - dn11, on 10/28/2007, -1/+15wow for a limited time only you can zoom into a painting and see paint cracks and dirt (complete with watermarks) in a tiny flash window in your browser. this is astounding, don't miss this once in a life time experience....
- Richie311, on 10/28/2007, -2/+15*Zing*
- sdubois92, on 10/28/2007, -1/+14Why not just torrent it?
- louiemantia, on 10/28/2007, -0/+13Da Vinci*
- Dontlooknow, on 10/28/2007, -1/+13If it did 404 it should read:
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. - MtheoryX, on 10/30/2007, -0/+9Jesus has all the cool stuff. He had an iPhone in 1986.
- Komodork, on 10/28/2007, -1/+10download at ur own risk? what does that mean
- PricklySponge, on 10/27/2007, -1/+9gtfo
- NoStoppingUs, on 10/27/2007, -1/+9this is why people should oppose minimum wage laws! so people who don't really deserve minimum wage won't get paid it!
- chad78, on 10/28/2007, -1/+5If you could actually download the entire picture at that level of detail - it would be an incredibly large file - it could easily lock your computer up if you aren't thinking about it. That said - it's not one big file - it's a pan and zoom viewer.
BTW - Watermarks - FTL - mojibake, on 10/28/2007, -1/+5Big arms, I know You're the One.
- inobla, on 10/28/2007, -1/+4As if the file size of a 16 GP image wasn't bad enough, now poor Hal and his hosting service will have the Digg Effect to contend with. Digg must be the hand of Satan.
- oepapel, on 10/28/2007, -1/+4I never said he was. I'm just saying that the picture has a chick. It could also have a buffalo. That doesn't mean that a buffalo was at the last supper. I'm just saying that arguing that the chick is really an apostle is a crap argument.
- tnoy, on 10/28/2007, -0/+3You do realize that Da Vinci wasnt there, right?
- cabazorro, on 10/28/2007, -1/+4First breakfast will served Oct 30th, continental Resurrection Colombian blend coffee with fresh cantaloupe.
- tnoy, on 10/28/2007, -0/+3Its a stiched image using shots from a Nikon D2Xs.
- MtheoryX, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3Buried, reported, and blocked. You people must breed like rabbits lately.
- onineko, on 10/28/2007, -0/+3Pixel is a measurement of speed now?
- TVarmy, on 10/28/2007, -2/+5Bit torrent jpeg would rock.
- burke, on 10/29/2007, -0/+3A 16 gigapixel image? Nah...
- zeeky, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3yes, i want that too, because this flash loader is painful. it hurts my actionscript. owwwww...
- zeeky, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3you could download it then view it in Preview.app or Windows Fax/Image Viewer... that'd be nice.
- xister, on 10/30/2007, -2/+5Hey, it's OK- Jesus is supposed to be coming back, so we'll just get him to pose for another one.
- burke, on 10/28/2007, -1/+3Who are you trying to kid? We all know God only deals in .RAW
- Livewired, on 10/28/2007, -0/+2Surprise... it's down. Talk about a flop.
- ismith, on 10/27/2007, -1/+3That means if you download it, prepare to leave your browser open for a very very very long time as the file is HUGE.
- delta013, on 10/30/2007, -0/+2The computer core from the starship Enterprise should be enough.
- windohs, on 10/29/2007, -0/+2Maybe it's been taken down like tv-links for linking to copyrighted material lol /sarcasm
- windohs, on 10/29/2007, -0/+2If they had Comcast it wouldn't go through due to traffic shaping which helps "make the network pleasant for everyone". 404's are comcastic!
- Metropolis, on 10/29/2007, -2/+4Jesus.
- badassninja, on 10/28/2007, -2/+4Holy Crap it's a south park reference.... Every time I think I know digg man...
- xister, on 10/28/2007, -1/+3Buried for taking comments waaay too personally.
- Wo1ke, on 10/27/2007, -0/+2The very least you could do is learn prappa gramma.
- oepapel, on 10/29/2007, -0/+2Pics or it didn't happen! (Paintings don't count...)
- tabaczka, on 10/28/2007, -4/+6Is this supposed to be revolutionary or something...
- jcaino, on 10/28/2007, -2/+4nope, just truthyness.
-
Show 51 - 81 of 81 discussions

What is Digg?