5 Comments
- AsSubtleAsABrik, on 06/17/2008, -0/+3I would be more than happy to pay for a subscription to download as many songs as I want legally. I'd be willing to part with as much as 30 bucks a month. They'd be making much more money from me than they are now, considering I spend about 0 dollars a month on music currently. Buying music just isn't worth it. 15-20 bucks a cd is too much.
- traveler19, on 06/17/2008, -0/+2See the greedy bastards want to screw us so this will never work. EA Direct game downloads not only charge you full price of a game on the shelf at walmart, they also charge you a fee just for the privilege of using their bandwidth. On top of that, you have to use their bloaty "encrpyted" download manager. ]
So a profitable P2P program would cost a monthly fee, a starting fee, a fee to view the search contents, full price on the actual content, bandwidth fee, chock full of advertisements, horrible customer service but with a free giant dildo for self reminders of how good the service actually is. - Aldanga, on 06/16/2008, -0/+1They have a wonderful money-making system right in front of their faces and refuse it. Idiots.
- asonedoes, on 06/16/2008, -1/+1no *****.
- dragonmantek, on 06/17/2008, -1/+0Even when there is a legal file sharing device, people would still not want to pay for it.



What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the