What is Digg?Sponsored by Sony Pictures
Watch a scene from 2012, in theaters November 13 view!
whowillsurvive2012.com - Get ready for the biggest event in history – the end of time. How will you survive? 2012- opening 11/13
77 Comments
- daroots, on 10/12/2007, -2/+41for those who are not following:
http://digg.com/technology/_Amazing_,_digg_,_revealed_:_Top_422_digg.com_attention_grabbing_words
nice title - TacitusBen, on 10/12/2007, -2/+33statistically, it should get 3500 diggs.
- ameotoko, on 10/12/2007, -2/+32I didn't want to digg this...
I had to. - johndi, on 10/12/2007, -2/+17Self control man, for the love of Nano-Mario show some self control!
- BassCadet, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13And you wasted my time by having to read your wonderful comment. :)
- adame, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12God some people are arrogant.... have a sensor of humour. What's the matter, got no life outside of digg?
- tso1965, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9YAY it hit the front page!
The irony is, I was just being sarcastic. Who knew sarcasm could go so far?
(BTW I don't have a website - it just links to one where I find a lot of good stories...) - craigtheguru, on 10/12/2007, -2/+10... or should it be reported as inaccurate?!
- elnerdo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Where do you get that number from.
I figure that statistically it should get about
1158.428571 repeating. (Average of all the words used in it).
Or, if you want to add them together
8109 diggs.
But where do you get THAT number from. - tso1965, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8This post doesn't make sense?? IT WASN'T SUPPOSED TO. It wasn't spam, and if it was an experiment, it was unconcious one.
Mostly, it was just sarcasm, using the top seven most effective DIGG keywords, posted in another article.
I had no idea it would hit the front page.
Apologies to anyone who was offended... - Sanchez, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9hehe, clever.
- regedit2D, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6you reported this as lame because you don't understand the context?
that's lame... - skatingrox, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7AAAAAAAND its off the frontpage. RIP
- Silentshadow900, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6the post above me was posted by a total nerd.
(but I dugg it anyway) - elron, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8You touch small children but do we complain?
- SirSid, on 05/27/2009, -3/+9Ahh get a sense of humor. God some people
- ermau, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5It's a poor experiment because people will digg it because they find it as funny in response to the previous digg article, not because of whats in the title.
- isleshocky77, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5He already said it's not even his site. Get a sense of humor.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6annnnnnd it's on the front page
- frogurt110, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7Read the link that daroots posted. It doesn't matter what the story links to, it's the title that's important.
- SenatorPenguin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4One of digg's problems is digging without reading the article, which is what this is about. However, commenting without reading sounds even worse.
- dgritsko, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5yeah same here, for a second i thought i was going to hear the real deal behind nano mario
- dr34m3r, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Dugg for experimental value
- dogoon, on 10/12/2007, -4/+8this isnt an add
its an experiment to see who diggs what for what words are in the title. - dave830, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I'll digg to that, tso1965. Don't listen to the haters around here.
I just wanna know if nano-mario gets them photos... - rcenterprises, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3It's been buried; too bad though.
- ghdave, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Is there an un-bury feature? It'd be hilarious to hear this talked about on Diggnation.
- unitedstatians, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3i think it was 'lyphe' ? what is that -thats weird
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3WHAT outside of digg? what was that word? leaf?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+37 * 500.......... that's about it.
- AltRN8, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Let's push it beyond 500 to screw with the inital analysis.
- SpectreBlofeld, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4And, proof positive that Digg's reliance on its users is its greatest strength AND it's greatest weakness.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Awesome experiment though!!!
- haloevo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3I dugg it. :o
- neffrix, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3wow, chill buddy
- mickoes, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Wow man, this is incredible, a must-digg!!
- hass, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4It refers to the story right after this one on the homepage. This got dugg fast.
- tso1965, on 10/12/2007, -4/+6Lets see if this really gets 500 diggs... :-P
- Izzie, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2in other news:
- people, they made my $100 digg awesome
- watch super geek officially boot water
- china store: it's drm physics revolution
- 2006, finally most city really display nes
- steve, earth top pro makes ultimate ajax
and so on...
diggers really need to learn how to write a consistent quality title. but the more users the dumber content... - SlappyMc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2aha, congrats.
The lesson we've all learned goes without stating. - vdubski, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4I'm not going to digg this, but I do like your sense of humor. I thought of doing the same exact thing while I was reading the list.
- Calculusaurus, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4It made me laugh. That's worth a digg.
- m4ktub, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1must ... not ... dig ...
the force is strong in his post ... can't resist it ... dugg it
If at least it didn't contained "amazing"... - M2Ys4U, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1hahaha, brilliant idea.
- adame, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Who ***** cares?
- vertigoblue, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2well its over 500 now
- ab500, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3It hit 500, I guess those buzzwords really do work.
- zzzneterlinken, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Look on http://blacknews.ru/ for more interesting stories like that
- p9s50W5k4GUD2c6, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3Off to the trash-bin - where this story belongs.
- orlyyarly, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2must... digg...
-
Show 51 - 78 of 78 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is