What is Digg?11 Comments
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8Congrats to Arrington for spamming his way into importance.
- netburnr, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7So ban his account(s) and web page from digg...
- Plasmatica, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Way to be a complete dickwad. I applaud you, Mr. Arrington.
- Cowchip7, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Having 10 accounts pretty much defeats the whole purpose of digg. Not worth a digg.
- cameron074, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5what a jackass
- BornWithRage, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Who the ***** is michael arrington and why does he think we care.
- suman78, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Seriously..lets not care who this guy is..but he has a point....We all believe the digg statitics..but there are going to be flaws which is not surprising...btw...there is now way digg can validate that a single guy can have more accounts and vote more time..the only thing we hear from digg, they have tools which find these kind of this..but not one know how they work and often I see some useless atricle in the front page with lot of diggs suddenly removed as spam and thats not the way digg should work..it should never make the homepage and the spam tools should prevent it.
- T0PS3O, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Maybe the poor guy just keeps losing his login credentials...
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1michael is techcrunch. one of the most popularly cited web sites on Digg.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2Somehow I can't see that happening, can you?
- richardland, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1digg has exploded; a year back I looked at the site and hated it, the whole front page was full of links to 2-3 year old articles;
I don't know what changed but this has improved, and because of that I joined.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is