What is Digg?59 Comments
- plarp, on 01/11/2008, -3/+30thanks! i'm going to steal this article and post it on mine!
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -1/+25What the ***** is up with bot-like comments today? Christ.
- crackedplastic, on 01/11/2008, -10/+29OMG A++++++ Excellent seller !!!!!!! Will buy from again!
- fuzzmeister, on 01/11/2008, -0/+12I nominate a topic for the next entry on this blog:
"How to enable WP-Cache" - lucidapathy, on 01/11/2008, -2/+14Holy ***** it's attack of the ass kissers!
- bubbles19518, on 01/11/2008, -2/+14This is the first non spam comment on this story so far.
- lukasmack, on 01/11/2008, -3/+13Something here suggests to me that the bury brigade are in action.
- Tippis, on 01/11/2008, -1/+10No, it's the "sod off you bought-off SOBs"-brigade.
- Jereso, on 01/11/2008, -7/+16People can't steal Wordpress blog contents because it always crashes after 1 viewer.
- Locuester, on 01/11/2008, -2/+10Should be renamed "How to watch the digg effect kill Wordpress yet again"
buried - duckyinc, on 01/11/2008, -1/+9"joost" quality? You mean bad?
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -1/+9Yeah, and they're doing us a damn fine service.
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -1/+8I just hope Kevin and the Digg crew are taking notice and hopefully blocking these parasitic idiots.
- hansonc, on 01/11/2008, -4/+11what's up with the picture of the funny looking gay guy?
- crackedplastic, on 01/11/2008, -2/+9Seems like this is common to "SEO" type articles. Spammy, at best.
- Otto, on 01/11/2008, -0/+6The plugin is here: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/rss-footer/
All it does is add a footer to every post in your feed with a link back to the original post. - solistus, on 01/12/2008, -0/+5No, mostly people sick of ass-kissing comments and Wordpress blogs without WP-Cache that get the digg effect after a dozen pageviews.
- Haecceity, on 01/11/2008, -0/+4We can't have expressions of appreciation on Digg. It just wouldn't do.
- Phlosten, on 01/12/2008, -0/+4"Error establishing a database connection" - No scraping happening on this website today!
- jkizzle, on 01/11/2008, -1/+5shouldnt you want to go to the source? for accuracy?
- surfing, on 01/12/2008, -0/+3I found Waldo
- hmunkey, on 01/11/2008, -1/+4Stop scraping.
- inactive, on 01/12/2008, -0/+3-- How to foil scrapers establishing a database connection on your Wordpress blog --
Post it on digg! - sylv3r, on 01/12/2008, -0/+3wait.. can't you do that with a bit of tweaking on feedburner already?
- bitcloud, on 01/12/2008, -0/+2Great comment as always from bubbles19518
keep up the excellent work! - Travelsonic, on 01/12/2008, -0/+2Buried by a non-scraper intelectual
- MtheoryX, on 01/12/2008, -1/+3Domain squatter's got that one. Damn.
However ...themhoLes.com is available. I know, that's horrible, im just sayin. - Katarn, on 01/11/2008, -1/+3Just wait until bots start showing up with comments to attack the bot-like comments.
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -2/+3Hello my fellow brethren
- JudgeMonkey, on 01/11/2008, -0/+1You aren't dead yet? Get in the damn ground already!
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -1/+2Look at the post after you (rizza01) while you still can.
- jemminger, on 01/12/2008, -0/+1eh, the point isn't that you can't scrape the content... it's that it links back to itself to benefit from your scraping.
- MtheoryX, on 01/12/2008, -0/+1What the hell is wrong with you?
- Gudeldar, on 01/12/2008, -0/+1I seriously buried you though.
- MtheoryX, on 01/12/2008, -0/+1You're doing it wrong.
- inactive, on 01/12/2008, -0/+1winner :)
- iDgg, on 01/12/2008, -0/+0why does this comment have less buries than the one before it?
- conestogo, on 01/15/2008, -0/+0It's a great plugin.
- JameSEO, on 01/14/2008, -1/+1I like anything that can get me an extra link pointing to here --> http://jameseo.com ;-)
- roboticelephant, on 01/12/2008, -2/+2Or just copyleft it and watch knowledge grow.
- bitcloud, on 01/12/2008, -1/+1Yeah SEO has always been the "self help speaker" of the net IMHO...
"Here are the magical keys to effortless success... sure I'm successful by telling OTHERS how to be successful, but the magical rules still apply!" - dood, on 01/12/2008, -1/+1Exactly. What do I care if someone copies my posts? It's not as though I'm never going to write another thing again, so I need to rely on old content for ad revenue or whatever.
- sschepis, on 01/12/2008, -3/+2actually, that's your boyfriend.
- inactive, on 01/11/2008, -6/+4Funny, I thought the idea was that information was to be freely available on the internet. I guess not. Now when I want to hear about someone's stupid opinion on a matter i.e. which photoshop tip is best, I guess I'll have to go to the source.
- sschepis, on 01/12/2008, -4/+2wow - scrapers actively burying comments here today, aren't ya
- datadatadata, on 01/11/2008, -5/+1Foiled again! Damn you, Joost!
- SteveTheSultan, on 01/11/2008, -6/+1LMAO nice try man but the blocker didn't work:
http://www.cachejunkies.com/index.aspx?UL=http://w ... - ivandir, on 01/11/2008, -7/+2This is not a serious post btw. :P
- ivandir, on 01/11/2008, -18/+5The best womens shoes on www.*****.com
- ddn3d, on 01/11/2008, -18/+3Great plugin.
-
Show 51 - 56 of 56 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is