Sponsored by Best Buy
He sings, he strums, and he works at Best Buy. view!
youtube.com - Musician and Best Buy employee, Keith Parsons, rocks his Best Buy holiday campaign audition.
15 Comments
- fober, on 10/22/2007, -1/+12I understand your reason for digging all the older stories (archive), but 1400+ in 48 hours!?
- Cyre, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9They should have left your idiotic ass banned!
- IvanB, on 10/12/2007, -3/+7I'm not sure you grasp Digg's concept. Digging 1400 stories in 48 hours is not "helping" the community in any way and especially not if you are digging a year old articles.
- RidesAPaleHorse, on 10/22/2007, -2/+6Dude, you had over 1400 diggs in 48 hours. If you stayed up and ONLY dugg articles for 48 hours, that's one every other minute.
Something tells me you're getting paid to digg articles... - decepticrat, on 10/22/2007, -0/+3I was *temporarily* banned for digging 300+ stories over a 24 hour period. I honestly don't think digging 300 or so stories in one day is that excessive, considering that it only works out to around 12 stories an hour, but according to digg it is categorized as misuse and spam-digging.
1400 is extremely excessive, yes, but I understand your reason. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Hey you go boy :)
- BestJaxx, on 10/22/2007, -0/+1Did you read his reasoning? If I were the person who banned his account, I would be ashamed of myself.
- Wailord, on 10/12/2007, -4/+51,400 diggs is less than two days?
It does sound a tad [maybe more than a tad] excessive, but I don't see why it's a valid reason to disable an account... - LakeshoreBaby, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Is there anyway that we can make the stories we Digg not add to popularity and front page ranking, because I only want to use Digg as the bookmarking service I thought it was when I signed up. I'd be digging way more stories than I do now just to save for future reference, but I don't want to be banned.
- BestJaxx, on 10/22/2007, -0/+1Fast-Fingers here could be of high use to the military. I suggest that you lay low for a while and wait for Uncle Sam to calm down.
- abc3, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0HI I JUST WHANT TO SAY HI TO YOU SO PLEASE WRITE BACK OK
- imacmike, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1The Please Please Get a Life foundation can help you with your digg addiction
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgd5S-X-_dQ - tippmann1, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2dugg because I've always wanted to find out what it's like to be banned from an online service
- rishqo, on 10/12/2007, -8/+4thankx for your kindness...
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1this may be a bit off topic, but when they say "hey, this story may have been submitted already" and then you look and say, "sure enough, same story, different source"
then you either resubmit anyway, or "digg" the earlier article.
Lots times you will see several duplicate articles that individually aren't getting much attention, but as a whole, the story may have 50+ diggs.
Plus, an article can be buried for being "a duplicate story"... so...
why can't we "bundle" these similar articles/ comments into a folder?
just a thought.
PS. I'm waiting for the AP to start a digg type set up, that is, if they want to remain THE clearing house of news.


What is Digg?